| Message ID | 1437496204-5438-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 05:30:04PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > Commit 9ccd608070b6 "arm64: dts: add device tree for ARM SMM-A53x2 on > LogicTile Express 20MG" added a new dts file to arch/arm64 which > included "../../../../arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi", i.e. a > .dtsi supplied by arch/arm. > > Unfortunately this causes some issues for the split device tree > repository[0], since things get moved around there. In that context > the new .dts ends up at src/arm64/arm/vexpress-v2f-1xv7-ca53x2.dts > while the include is at src/arm/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi. > > The sharing of the .dtsi is legitimate since the baseboard is the same > for various vexpress systems whatever processor they use. > > Rather than using ../../ tricks to pickup .dtsi files from another > arch this patch creates a new directory include/dt-bindings/dtsi as a > home for such cross-arch .dtsi files, arranges for it to be in the > include path when the .dts files are processed by cpp and switches the > .dts files to use cpp #include instead of /include/. > > [0] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/devicetree/devicetree-rebasing.git/ > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> > Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> > Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org> > Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com> > Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> > Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> > Cc: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> > Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Picking your brains here: would it be worth to have some vendor directories in this shared area or we can hope that there will be very few files living here? Best regards, Liviu > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vexpress.txt | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca5s.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/vexpress-v2f-1xv7-ca53x2.dts | 2 +- > {arch/arm/boot/dts => include/dt-bindings/dtsi}/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi | 0 > scripts/Makefile.lib | 1 + > 7 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > rename {arch/arm/boot/dts => include/dt-bindings/dtsi}/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi (100%) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vexpress.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vexpress.txt > index 39844cd..46c6b04 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vexpress.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vexpress.txt > @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ Example of a VE tile description (simplified) > /* Active high IRQ 0 is connected to GIC's SPI0 */ > interrupt-map = <0 0 0 &gic 0 0 4>; > > - /include/ "vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi" > + #include <vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi> > }; > }; > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dts > index 9420053..85b201e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dts > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dts > @@ -278,6 +278,6 @@ > <0 0 41 &gic 0 41 4>, > <0 0 42 &gic 0 42 4>; > > - /include/ "vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi" > + #include <vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi> > }; > }; > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts > index 17f63f7..fe5091d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts > @@ -636,6 +636,6 @@ > <0 0 41 &gic 0 41 4>, > <0 0 42 &gic 0 42 4>; > > - /include/ "vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi" > + #include <vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi> > }; > }; > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca5s.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca5s.dts > index d2709b7..a028d59 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca5s.dts > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca5s.dts > @@ -248,6 +248,6 @@ > <0 0 41 &gic 0 41 4>, > <0 0 42 &gic 0 42 4>; > > - /include/ "vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi" > + #include <vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi> > }; > }; > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/vexpress-v2f-1xv7-ca53x2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/vexpress-v2f-1xv7-ca53x2.dts > index 5b1d018..b4257ee 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/vexpress-v2f-1xv7-ca53x2.dts > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/vexpress-v2f-1xv7-ca53x2.dts > @@ -186,6 +186,6 @@ > <0 0 41 &gic GIC_SPI 41 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > <0 0 42 &gic GIC_SPI 42 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > - /include/ "../../../../arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi" > + #include <vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi> > }; > }; > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi b/include/dt-bindings/dtsi/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi > similarity index 100% > rename from arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi > rename to include/dt-bindings/dtsi/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi > diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.lib b/scripts/Makefile.lib > index 79e8661..bb10128 100644 > --- a/scripts/Makefile.lib > +++ b/scripts/Makefile.lib > @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ dtc_cpp_flags = -Wp,-MD,$(depfile).pre.tmp -nostdinc \ > -I$(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/boot/dts \ > -I$(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/boot/dts/include \ > -I$(srctree)/drivers/of/testcase-data \ > + -I$(srctree)/include/dt-bindings/dtsi \ > -undef -D__DTS__ > > # Finds the multi-part object the current object will be linked into > -- > 2.1.4 >
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 09:47 +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Thanks. > Picking your brains here: would it be worth to have some vendor directories in > this shared area or we can hope that there will be very few files living here? I'm honestly not sure. I don't expect there will be very many files under here, and I would expect the norm would be that common .dtsi files used by multiple arches would be things from the same vendor, but I don't think we can guarantee that. Ian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:47:18AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 09:47 +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > > > Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> > > Thanks. > > > Picking your brains here: would it be worth to have some vendor directories in > > this shared area or we can hope that there will be very few files living here? > > I'm honestly not sure. > > I don't expect there will be very many files under here, and I would > expect the norm would be that common .dtsi files used by multiple > arches would be things from the same vendor, but I don't think we can > guarantee that. I'm not so sure that this area will remain small. I suspect we'll see a reasonable amount of sharing for arm/arm64 where two SoCs differ sith s/Cortex-A7/Cortex-A53/, for example. Perhaps we could wait until the that starts to happen; we managed to survive for a while before moving arm64's dts into subdirs. Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 12:31 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:47:18AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 09:47 +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > > > > > Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> > > > > Thanks. > > > > > Picking your brains here: would it be worth to have some vendor > > > directories in > > > this shared area or we can hope that there will be very few files > > > living here? > > > > I'm honestly not sure. > > > > I don't expect there will be very many files under here, and I > > would > > expect the norm would be that common .dtsi files used by multiple > > arches would be things from the same vendor, but I don't think we > > can > > guarantee that. > > I'm not so sure that this area will remain small. I suspect we'll see > a reasonable amount of sharing for arm/arm64 where two SoCs differ > sith > s/Cortex-A7/Cortex-A53/, for example. > > Perhaps we could wait until the that starts to happen; we managed to > survive for a while before moving arm64's dts into subdirs. If we think it is inevitable we may as well bite the bullet, plus I've already done "git commit --amend" to move it to include/dt-dtsi/arm ;-) Ian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vexpress.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vexpress.txt index 39844cd..46c6b04 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vexpress.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vexpress.txt @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ Example of a VE tile description (simplified) /* Active high IRQ 0 is connected to GIC's SPI0 */ interrupt-map = <0 0 0 &gic 0 0 4>; - /include/ "vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi" + #include <vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi> }; }; diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dts index 9420053..85b201e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dts @@ -278,6 +278,6 @@ <0 0 41 &gic 0 41 4>, <0 0 42 &gic 0 42 4>; - /include/ "vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi" + #include <vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi> }; }; diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts index 17f63f7..fe5091d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts @@ -636,6 +636,6 @@ <0 0 41 &gic 0 41 4>, <0 0 42 &gic 0 42 4>; - /include/ "vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi" + #include <vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi> }; }; diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca5s.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca5s.dts index d2709b7..a028d59 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca5s.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca5s.dts @@ -248,6 +248,6 @@ <0 0 41 &gic 0 41 4>, <0 0 42 &gic 0 42 4>; - /include/ "vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi" + #include <vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi> }; }; diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/vexpress-v2f-1xv7-ca53x2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/vexpress-v2f-1xv7-ca53x2.dts index 5b1d018..b4257ee 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/vexpress-v2f-1xv7-ca53x2.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/vexpress-v2f-1xv7-ca53x2.dts @@ -186,6 +186,6 @@ <0 0 41 &gic GIC_SPI 41 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, <0 0 42 &gic GIC_SPI 42 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; - /include/ "../../../../arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi" + #include <vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi> }; }; diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi b/include/dt-bindings/dtsi/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi similarity index 100% rename from arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi rename to include/dt-bindings/dtsi/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.lib b/scripts/Makefile.lib index 79e8661..bb10128 100644 --- a/scripts/Makefile.lib +++ b/scripts/Makefile.lib @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ dtc_cpp_flags = -Wp,-MD,$(depfile).pre.tmp -nostdinc \ -I$(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/boot/dts \ -I$(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/boot/dts/include \ -I$(srctree)/drivers/of/testcase-data \ + -I$(srctree)/include/dt-bindings/dtsi \ -undef -D__DTS__ # Finds the multi-part object the current object will be linked into
Commit 9ccd608070b6 "arm64: dts: add device tree for ARM SMM-A53x2 on LogicTile Express 20MG" added a new dts file to arch/arm64 which included "../../../../arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi", i.e. a .dtsi supplied by arch/arm. Unfortunately this causes some issues for the split device tree repository[0], since things get moved around there. In that context the new .dts ends up at src/arm64/arm/vexpress-v2f-1xv7-ca53x2.dts while the include is at src/arm/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi. The sharing of the .dtsi is legitimate since the baseboard is the same for various vexpress systems whatever processor they use. Rather than using ../../ tricks to pickup .dtsi files from another arch this patch creates a new directory include/dt-bindings/dtsi as a home for such cross-arch .dtsi files, arranges for it to be in the include path when the .dts files are processed by cpp and switches the .dts files to use cpp #include instead of /include/. [0] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/devicetree/devicetree-rebasing.git/ Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org> Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vexpress.txt | 2 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dts | 2 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts | 2 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca5s.dts | 2 +- arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/vexpress-v2f-1xv7-ca53x2.dts | 2 +- {arch/arm/boot/dts => include/dt-bindings/dtsi}/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi | 0 scripts/Makefile.lib | 1 + 7 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) rename {arch/arm/boot/dts => include/dt-bindings/dtsi}/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi (100%)