Message ID | 1442986835-13985-1-git-send-email-mpe@ellerman.id.au (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 2015-09-23 07:40, Michael Ellerman wrote: > +else ifneq ($(wildcard arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)),) > @$(kecho) "*** Default configuration is based on '$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)'" > $(Q)$< $(silent) --defconfig=arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG) $(Kconfig) > +else > + @$(kecho) "*** Default configuration is based on target '$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)'" > + $(Q)$(MAKE) -f $(srctree)/Makefile $(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG) > endif What is the anticipated usage of this? The patch is not needed to make make ppc64le_defconfig work with the second patch. If it was, this would create a loop anyway. Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 23 September 2015 19:50:52 GMT+10:00, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> wrote: >On 2015-09-23 07:40, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> +else ifneq ($(wildcard >arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)),) >> @$(kecho) "*** Default configuration is based on >'$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)'" >> $(Q)$< $(silent) >--defconfig=arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG) $(Kconfig) >> +else >> + @$(kecho) "*** Default configuration is based on target >'$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)'" >> + $(Q)$(MAKE) -f $(srctree)/Makefile $(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG) >> endif > >What is the anticipated usage of this? The patch is not needed to make > > make ppc64le_defconfig > >work with the second patch. If it was, this would create a loop anyway. The idea is to make 'make defconfig' work when KBUILD_DEFCONFIG is ppc64le_defconfig (which happens for us when uname returns ppc64le) and additionally when ppc64le_defconfig is not a real file. It doesn't work currently, but does with these two patches applied. cheers
Dne 24.9.2015 v 00:16 Michael Ellerman napsal(a): > > > On 23 September 2015 19:50:52 GMT+10:00, Michal Marek > <mmarek@suse.com> wrote: >> On 2015-09-23 07:40, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> +else ifneq ($(wildcard >> arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)),) >>> @$(kecho) "*** Default configuration is based on >> '$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)'" >>> $(Q)$< $(silent) >> --defconfig=arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG) $(Kconfig) >>> +else + @$(kecho) "*** Default configuration is based on target >> '$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)'" >>> + $(Q)$(MAKE) -f $(srctree)/Makefile $(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG) endif >> >> What is the anticipated usage of this? The patch is not needed to >> make >> >> make ppc64le_defconfig >> >> work with the second patch. If it was, this would create a loop >> anyway. > > The idea is to make 'make defconfig' work when KBUILD_DEFCONFIG is > ppc64le_defconfig (which happens for us when uname returns ppc64le) > and additionally when ppc64le_defconfig is not a real file. Ah, that makes sense. You can add Acked-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> if you want. Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 22:46 +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > Dne 24.9.2015 v 00:16 Michael Ellerman napsal(a): > > > > > > On 23 September 2015 19:50:52 GMT+10:00, Michal Marek > > <mmarek@suse.com> wrote: > >> On 2015-09-23 07:40, Michael Ellerman wrote: > >>> +else ifneq ($(wildcard > >> arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)),) > >>> @$(kecho) "*** Default configuration is based on > >> '$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)'" > >>> $(Q)$< $(silent) > >> --defconfig=arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG) $(Kconfig) > >>> +else + @$(kecho) "*** Default configuration is based on target > >> '$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)'" > >>> + $(Q)$(MAKE) -f $(srctree)/Makefile $(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG) endif > >> > >> What is the anticipated usage of this? The patch is not needed to > >> make > >> > >> make ppc64le_defconfig > >> > >> work with the second patch. If it was, this would create a loop > >> anyway. > > > > The idea is to make 'make defconfig' work when KBUILD_DEFCONFIG is > > ppc64le_defconfig (which happens for us when uname returns ppc64le) > > and additionally when ppc64le_defconfig is not a real file. > > Ah, that makes sense. You can add > > Acked-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> > > if you want. Thanks. I'll assume by that you mean you're happy if I take both patches through the powerpc tree. cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2015-10-01 08:14, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 22:46 +0200, Michal Marek wrote: >> Dne 24.9.2015 v 00:16 Michael Ellerman napsal(a): >>> >>> >>> On 23 September 2015 19:50:52 GMT+10:00, Michal Marek >>> <mmarek@suse.com> wrote: >>>> On 2015-09-23 07:40, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>>>> +else ifneq ($(wildcard >>>> arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)),) >>>>> @$(kecho) "*** Default configuration is based on >>>> '$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)'" >>>>> $(Q)$< $(silent) >>>> --defconfig=arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG) $(Kconfig) >>>>> +else + @$(kecho) "*** Default configuration is based on target >>>> '$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)'" >>>>> + $(Q)$(MAKE) -f $(srctree)/Makefile $(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG) endif >>>> >>>> What is the anticipated usage of this? The patch is not needed to >>>> make >>>> >>>> make ppc64le_defconfig >>>> >>>> work with the second patch. If it was, this would create a loop >>>> anyway. >>> >>> The idea is to make 'make defconfig' work when KBUILD_DEFCONFIG is >>> ppc64le_defconfig (which happens for us when uname returns ppc64le) >>> and additionally when ppc64le_defconfig is not a real file. >> >> Ah, that makes sense. You can add >> >> Acked-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> >> >> if you want. > > Thanks. I'll assume by that you mean you're happy if I take both patches > through the powerpc tree. Yes, I assumed that this was your plan. Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 08:50 +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > On 2015-10-01 08:14, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 22:46 +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > >> Dne 24.9.2015 v 00:16 Michael Ellerman napsal(a): > >>> On 23 September 2015 19:50:52 GMT+10:00, Michal Marek > >>> <mmarek@suse.com> wrote: > >>>> On 2015-09-23 07:40, Michael Ellerman wrote: > >>>>> +else ifneq ($(wildcard > >>>> arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)),) > >>>>> @$(kecho) "*** Default configuration is based on > >>>> '$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)'" > >>>>> $(Q)$< $(silent) > >>>> --defconfig=arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG) $(Kconfig) > >>>>> +else + @$(kecho) "*** Default configuration is based on target > >>>> '$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)'" > >>>>> + $(Q)$(MAKE) -f $(srctree)/Makefile $(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG) endif > >>>> > >>>> What is the anticipated usage of this? The patch is not needed to > >>>> make > >>>> > >>>> make ppc64le_defconfig > >>>> > >>>> work with the second patch. If it was, this would create a loop > >>>> anyway. > >>> > >>> The idea is to make 'make defconfig' work when KBUILD_DEFCONFIG is > >>> ppc64le_defconfig (which happens for us when uname returns ppc64le) > >>> and additionally when ppc64le_defconfig is not a real file. > >> > >> Ah, that makes sense. You can add > >> > >> Acked-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> > >> > >> if you want. > > > > Thanks. I'll assume by that you mean you're happy if I take both patches > > through the powerpc tree. > > Yes, I assumed that this was your plan. I didn't really have a plan :) It's certainly easiest if I take it in my tree along with the new ppc64le_defconfig, so I'll do that. Thanks. cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, 2015-23-09 at 05:40:34 UTC, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Arch Makefiles can set KBUILD_DEFCONFIG to tell kbuild the name of the > defconfig that should be built by default. > > However currently there is an assumption that KBUILD_DEFCONFIG points to > a file at arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG). > > We would like to use a target, using merge_config, as our defconfig, so > adapt the logic in scripts/kconfig/Makefile to allow that. > > To minimise the chance of breaking anything, we first check if > KBUILD_DEFCONFIG is a file, and if so we do the old logic. If it's not a > file, then we call the top-level Makefile with KBUILD_DEFCONFIG as the > target. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> > Acked-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> Applied to powerpc next. https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/d2036f30cfe1daa19e63ce75 cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-23-09 at 05:40:34 UTC, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Arch Makefiles can set KBUILD_DEFCONFIG to tell kbuild the name of the >> defconfig that should be built by default. >> >> However currently there is an assumption that KBUILD_DEFCONFIG points to >> a file at arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG). >> >> We would like to use a target, using merge_config, as our defconfig, so >> adapt the logic in scripts/kconfig/Makefile to allow that. >> >> To minimise the chance of breaking anything, we first check if >> KBUILD_DEFCONFIG is a file, and if so we do the old logic. If it's not a >> file, then we call the top-level Makefile with KBUILD_DEFCONFIG as the >> target. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> >> Acked-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> > > Applied to powerpc next. > > https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/d2036f30cfe1daa19e63ce75 This breaks arm64 defconfig for me: mkdir obj-tmp make -f Makefile O=obj-tmp ARCH=arm64 defconfig ... watch loop of: *** Default configuration is based on target 'defconfig' GEN ./Makefile -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/Makefile b/scripts/kconfig/Makefile index aceaaed09811..b2b9c87cec50 100644 --- a/scripts/kconfig/Makefile +++ b/scripts/kconfig/Makefile @@ -96,9 +96,12 @@ savedefconfig: $(obj)/conf defconfig: $(obj)/conf ifeq ($(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG),) $< $(silent) --defconfig $(Kconfig) -else +else ifneq ($(wildcard arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)),) @$(kecho) "*** Default configuration is based on '$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)'" $(Q)$< $(silent) --defconfig=arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG) $(Kconfig) +else + @$(kecho) "*** Default configuration is based on target '$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)'" + $(Q)$(MAKE) -f $(srctree)/Makefile $(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG) endif %_defconfig: $(obj)/conf
Arch Makefiles can set KBUILD_DEFCONFIG to tell kbuild the name of the defconfig that should be built by default. However currently there is an assumption that KBUILD_DEFCONFIG points to a file at arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG). We would like to use a target, using merge_config, as our defconfig, so adapt the logic in scripts/kconfig/Makefile to allow that. To minimise the chance of breaking anything, we first check if KBUILD_DEFCONFIG is a file, and if so we do the old logic. If it's not a file, then we call the top-level Makefile with KBUILD_DEFCONFIG as the target. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> --- scripts/kconfig/Makefile | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)