@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ static bool stackinit_range_contains(char *haystack_start, size_t haystack_size,
#define INIT_STRUCT_none(var_type) /**/
#define INIT_STRUCT_zero(var_type) = { }
+#define INIT_STRUCT_old_zero(var_type) = { 0 }
#define __static_partial { .two = 0, }
@@ -346,6 +347,7 @@ struct test_user {
/* These should be fully initialized all the time! */
DEFINE_SCALAR_TESTS(zero, ALWAYS_PASS);
DEFINE_STRUCT_TESTS(zero, ALWAYS_PASS);
+DEFINE_STRUCT_TESTS(old_zero, ALWAYS_PASS);
/* Struct initializers: padding may be left uninitialized. */
DEFINE_STRUCT_INITIALIZER_TESTS(static, STRONG_PASS);
DEFINE_STRUCT_INITIALIZER_TESTS(dynamic, STRONG_PASS);
@@ -440,6 +442,7 @@ static struct kunit_case stackinit_test_cases[] = {
/* These are explicitly initialized and should always pass. */
KUNIT_test_scalars(zero),
KUNIT_test_structs(zero),
+ KUNIT_test_structs(old_zero),
/* Padding here appears to be accidentally always initialized? */
KUNIT_test_structs(dynamic_partial),
KUNIT_test_structs(assigned_dynamic_partial),
The deprecated way to do a full zero init of a structure is with "= { 0 }", but we weren't testing this style. Add it. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> --- lib/stackinit_kunit.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)