Message ID | 20230602013358.900637-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | A minor flurry of selftest/mm fixes | expand |
On 02.06.23 03:33, John Hubbard wrote: > It turned out that an even dozen patches were required in order to get the > selftests building cleanly, and all running, once again. I made it worse on > myself by insisting on using clang, which seems to uncover a few more warnings > than gcc these days. > > So I still haven't gotten to my original goal of running a new HMM test that > Alistair handed me (it's not here yet), but at least this fixes everything I ran > into just now. Thanks, now I can stop commenting out some (IIRC primarily uffd-related) tests when just wanting to run some specific tests on some of odd installations :D I assume this round you only consideres 64bit builds, right? My last attempts with 32bit revealed a lot of issues, and I only fixed what I really wanted to test (COW).
On 6/2/23 02:32, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 02.06.23 03:33, John Hubbard wrote: >> It turned out that an even dozen patches were required in order to get the >> selftests building cleanly, and all running, once again. I made it worse on >> myself by insisting on using clang, which seems to uncover a few more warnings >> than gcc these days. >> >> So I still haven't gotten to my original goal of running a new HMM test that >> Alistair handed me (it's not here yet), but at least this fixes everything I ran >> into just now. > > Thanks, now I can stop commenting out some (IIRC primarily uffd-related) tests when just wanting to run some specific tests on some of odd installations :D aha! :) > > I assume this round you only consideres 64bit builds, right? My last attempts with 32bit revealed a lot of issues, and I only fixed what I really wanted to test (COW). > Yes, that's correct. I only tested on 64-bit. I've drifted into a "32 bit is mostly just for embedded systems" sort of mindset lately, and don't have anything set up for testing those locally. thanks,