Message ID | 20250401-ublk_selftests-v1-0-98129c9bc8bb@purestorage.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ublk: fixes for selftests | expand |
On Tue, 01 Apr 2025 14:49:07 -0600, Uday Shankar wrote: > Fix a couple of issues I saw when developing selftests for ublk. These > patches are split out from the following series: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20250325-ublk_timeout-v1-0-262f0121a7bd@purestorage.com/T/#t > > Applied, thanks! [1/2] selftests: ublk: kublk: use ioctl-encoded opcodes (no commit info) [2/2] selftests: ublk: kublk: fix an error log line (no commit info) Best regards,
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 07:12:45AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Tue, 01 Apr 2025 14:49:07 -0600, Uday Shankar wrote: > > Fix a couple of issues I saw when developing selftests for ublk. These > > patches are split out from the following series: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20250325-ublk_timeout-v1-0-262f0121a7bd@purestorage.com/T/#t > > > > > > Applied, thanks! > > [1/2] selftests: ublk: kublk: use ioctl-encoded opcodes > (no commit info) > [2/2] selftests: ublk: kublk: fix an error log line > (no commit info) Jens, MAINTAINERS parsing didn't add you to this email - I had to do it manually. Do we need to add you somewhere so you get a copy of all ublk patches (since you maintain its tree)?
On 4/2/25 1:34 PM, Uday Shankar wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 07:12:45AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> >> On Tue, 01 Apr 2025 14:49:07 -0600, Uday Shankar wrote: >>> Fix a couple of issues I saw when developing selftests for ublk. These >>> patches are split out from the following series: >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20250325-ublk_timeout-v1-0-262f0121a7bd@purestorage.com/T/#t >>> >>> >> >> Applied, thanks! >> >> [1/2] selftests: ublk: kublk: use ioctl-encoded opcodes >> (no commit info) >> [2/2] selftests: ublk: kublk: fix an error log line >> (no commit info) > > Jens, MAINTAINERS parsing didn't add you to this email - I had to do it > manually. Do we need to add you somewhere so you get a copy of all ublk > patches (since you maintain its tree)? It's under ublk, so it should go to linux-block. That should be good enough, I'll see them.
Fix a couple of issues I saw when developing selftests for ublk. These patches are split out from the following series: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20250325-ublk_timeout-v1-0-262f0121a7bd@purestorage.com/T/#t Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com> --- Uday Shankar (2): selftests: ublk: kublk: use ioctl-encoded opcodes selftests: ublk: kublk: fix an error log line tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- base-commit: 4cfcc398357b0fb3d4c97d47d4a9e3c0653b7903 change-id: 20250325-ublk_selftests-6a055dfbc55b Best regards,