Message ID | cover.1688078604.git.falcon@tinylab.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | allow run with minimal kernel config | expand |
On 2023-06-30 07:22:39+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote: > Willy, Thomas > > This is v2 to allow run with minimal kernel config, see v1 [1]. > > It mainly applied the suggestions from Thomas. It is based on our > previous v5 sysret helper series [2] and Thomas' chmod_net removal > patchset [3]. > > Now, a test report on arm/vexpress-a9 without procfs, shmem, tmpfs, net > and memfd_create looks like: > > LOG: testing report for arm/vexpress-a9: > > 14 chmod_net [SKIPPED] Shouldn't this be gone? > 15 chmod_self [SKIPPED] > 17 chown_self [SKIPPED] > 41 link_cross [SKIPPED] > 0 -fstackprotector not supported [SKIPPED] > > 139 test(s) passed, 5 skipped, 0 failed. > See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log > > LOG: testing summary: > > arch/board | result > ------------|------------ > arm/vexpress-a9 | 139 test(s) passed, 5 skipped, 0 failed. See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log > [..] > tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 22 ++++ > tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 102 +++++++++++++++---- > 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) A few nitpicks left, mentioned on the patches themselves. In general: for the full series. Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Hi, Thomas > On 2023-06-30 07:22:39+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote: > > Willy, Thomas > > > > This is v2 to allow run with minimal kernel config, see v1 [1]. > > > > It mainly applied the suggestions from Thomas. It is based on our > > previous v5 sysret helper series [2] and Thomas' chmod_net removal > > patchset [3]. > > > > Now, a test report on arm/vexpress-a9 without procfs, shmem, tmpfs, net > > and memfd_create looks like: > > > > LOG: testing report for arm/vexpress-a9: > > > > 14 chmod_net [SKIPPED] > > Shouldn't this be gone? > Yes, if apply your chmod_net removal patches before this series: LOG: testing report for arm/vexpress-a9: 14 chmod_self [SKIPPED] 16 chown_self [SKIPPED] 40 link_cross [SKIPPED] 0 -fstackprotector not supported [SKIPPED] 139 test(s) passed, 4 skipped, 0 failed. See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log LOG: testing summary: arch/board | result ------------|------------ arm/vexpress-a9 | 139 test(s) passed, 4 skipped, 0 failed. See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log This test also applied the new proposed chroot_exe and chmod_tmpfile from https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230630111433.211130-1-falcon@tinylab.org/ > > 15 chmod_self [SKIPPED] > > 17 chown_self [SKIPPED] > > 41 link_cross [SKIPPED] > > 0 -fstackprotector not supported [SKIPPED] > > > > 139 test(s) passed, 5 skipped, 0 failed. > > See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log > > > > LOG: testing summary: > > > > arch/board | result > > ------------|------------ > > arm/vexpress-a9 | 139 test(s) passed, 5 skipped, 0 failed. See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log > > > [..] > > > tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 22 ++++ > > tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 102 +++++++++++++++---- > > 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > A few nitpicks left, mentioned on the patches themselves. > > In general: for the full series. > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> > Thanks Thomas, will send v3 later. Best regards, Zhangjin