Message ID | cover.1695369120.git.maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | selftests/resctrl: Bug fix and optimization | expand |
Hi Maciej, On 9/22/2023 1:09 AM, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote: > The resctrlfs.c file defines functions that interact with the resctrl FS > while resctrl_val.c file defines functions that perform measurements on > the cache. Run_benchmark() fits logically into the second file before > resctrl_val() function that uses it. nitpick ... if there are comments in one patch of the series please consider if it applies to other places in the series. > > Move run_benchmark() from resctrlfs.c to resctrl_val.c and remove > redundant part of the kernel-doc comment. Make run_benchmark() static > and remove it from the header file. > > Patch series is based on [1] which is based on [2] which are based on > ksefltest next branch. ksefltest -> kselftest Reinette
Thanks for catching these, I'll remember to do that the next time. On 2023-09-27 at 15:16:18 -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote: >Hi Maciej, > >On 9/22/2023 1:09 AM, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote: >> The resctrlfs.c file defines functions that interact with the resctrl FS >> while resctrl_val.c file defines functions that perform measurements on >> the cache. Run_benchmark() fits logically into the second file before >> resctrl_val() function that uses it. > >nitpick ... if there are comments in one patch of the series please consider >if it applies to other places in the series. > >> >> Move run_benchmark() from resctrlfs.c to resctrl_val.c and remove >> redundant part of the kernel-doc comment. Make run_benchmark() static >> and remove it from the header file. >> >> Patch series is based on [1] which is based on [2] which are based on >> ksefltest next branch. > >ksefltest -> kselftest > >Reinette