diff mbox series

[-next] selftests/seccomp: Use bitwise instead of arithmetic operator for flags

Message ID 1586924101-65940-1-git-send-email-zou_wei@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series [-next] selftests/seccomp: Use bitwise instead of arithmetic operator for flags | expand

Commit Message

Zou Wei April 15, 2020, 4:15 a.m. UTC
This silences the following coccinelle warning:

"WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |"

tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c:3131:17-18: WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c:3133:18-19: WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c:3134:18-19: WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c:3135:18-19: WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |

Fixes: 6a21cc50f0c7 ("seccomp: add a return code to trap to userspace")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Kees Cook Sept. 8, 2020, 11:22 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:15:01 +0800, Zou Wei wrote:
> This silences the following coccinelle warning:
> 
> "WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |"
> 
> tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c:3131:17-18: WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |
> tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c:3133:18-19: WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |
> tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c:3134:18-19: WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |
> tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c:3135:18-19: WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] selftests/seccomp: Use bitwise instead of arithmetic operator for flags
      https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/76993fe3c1e4

Sorry for the massive delay on this one! I lost this email in my inbox. :)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 89fb3e0..1b4cdf3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -3128,11 +3128,11 @@  TEST(get_metadata)
 static int user_trap_syscall(int nr, unsigned int flags)
 {
 	struct sock_filter filter[] = {
-		BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_W+BPF_ABS,
+		BPF_STMT(BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS,
 			offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)),
-		BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, nr, 0, 1),
-		BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF),
-		BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW),
+		BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, nr, 0, 1),
+		BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF),
+		BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW),
 	};
 
 	struct sock_fprog prog = {