diff mbox series

[v7,06/24] goldish_pipe: rename local pin_user_pages() routine

Message ID 20191121071354.456618-7-jhubbard@nvidia.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series mm/gup: track dma-pinned pages: FOLL_PIN | expand

Commit Message

John Hubbard Nov. 21, 2019, 7:13 a.m. UTC 
1. Avoid naming conflicts: rename local static function from
"pin_user_pages()" to "pin_goldfish_pages()".

An upcoming patch will introduce a global pin_user_pages()
function.

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/platform/goldfish/goldfish_pipe.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Christoph Hellwig Nov. 21, 2019, 8:08 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:13:36PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
> +static int pin_goldfish_pages(unsigned long first_page,
> +			      unsigned long last_page,
> +			      unsigned int last_page_size,
> +			      int is_write,
> +			      struct page *pages[MAX_BUFFERS_PER_COMMAND],
> +			      unsigned int *iter_last_page_size)

Why not goldfish_pin_pages?  Normally we put the module / subsystem
in front.

Also can we get this queued up for 5.5 to get some trivial changes
out of the way?
John Hubbard Nov. 21, 2019, 8:36 a.m. UTC | #2 
On 11/21/19 12:08 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:13:36PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
>> +static int pin_goldfish_pages(unsigned long first_page,
>> +			      unsigned long last_page,
>> +			      unsigned int last_page_size,
>> +			      int is_write,
>> +			      struct page *pages[MAX_BUFFERS_PER_COMMAND],
>> +			      unsigned int *iter_last_page_size)
> 
> Why not goldfish_pin_pages?  Normally we put the module / subsystem
> in front.

Heh, is that how it's supposed to go?  Sure, I'll change it. :)

> 
> Also can we get this queued up for 5.5 to get some trivial changes
> out of the way?
> 

Is that a question to Andrew, or a request for me to send this as a
separate patch email (or both)?


thanks,
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/platform/goldfish/goldfish_pipe.c b/drivers/platform/goldfish/goldfish_pipe.c
index cef0133aa47a..7ed2a21a0bac 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/goldfish/goldfish_pipe.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/goldfish/goldfish_pipe.c
@@ -257,12 +257,12 @@  static int goldfish_pipe_error_convert(int status)
 	}
 }
 
-static int pin_user_pages(unsigned long first_page,
-			  unsigned long last_page,
-			  unsigned int last_page_size,
-			  int is_write,
-			  struct page *pages[MAX_BUFFERS_PER_COMMAND],
-			  unsigned int *iter_last_page_size)
+static int pin_goldfish_pages(unsigned long first_page,
+			      unsigned long last_page,
+			      unsigned int last_page_size,
+			      int is_write,
+			      struct page *pages[MAX_BUFFERS_PER_COMMAND],
+			      unsigned int *iter_last_page_size)
 {
 	int ret;
 	int requested_pages = ((last_page - first_page) >> PAGE_SHIFT) + 1;
@@ -354,9 +354,9 @@  static int transfer_max_buffers(struct goldfish_pipe *pipe,
 	if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&pipe->lock))
 		return -ERESTARTSYS;
 
-	pages_count = pin_user_pages(first_page, last_page,
-				     last_page_size, is_write,
-				     pipe->pages, &iter_last_page_size);
+	pages_count = pin_goldfish_pages(first_page, last_page,
+					 last_page_size, is_write,
+					 pipe->pages, &iter_last_page_size);
 	if (pages_count < 0) {
 		mutex_unlock(&pipe->lock);
 		return pages_count;