@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
#define REUSEPORT_ARRAY_SIZE 32
static int result_map, tmp_index_ovr_map, linum_map, data_check_map;
-static enum result expected_results[NR_RESULTS];
+static __u32 expected_results[NR_RESULTS];
static int sk_fds[REUSEPORT_ARRAY_SIZE];
static int reuseport_array = -1, outer_map = -1;
static int select_by_skb_data_prog;
@@ -697,7 +697,19 @@ static void setup_per_test(int type, sa_family_t family, bool inany,
static void cleanup_per_test(bool no_inner_map)
{
- int i, err;
+ int i, err, zero = 0;
+
+ memset(expected_results, 0, sizeof(expected_results));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_RESULTS; i++) {
+ err = bpf_map_update_elem(result_map, &i, &zero, BPF_ANY);
+ RET_IF(err, "reset elem in result_map",
+ "i:%u err:%d errno:%d\n", i, err, errno);
+ }
+
+ err = bpf_map_update_elem(linum_map, &zero, &zero, BPF_ANY);
+ RET_IF(err, "reset line number in linum_map", "err:%d errno:%d\n",
+ err, errno);
for (i = 0; i < REUSEPORT_ARRAY_SIZE; i++)
close(sk_fds[i]);
Currently, there is a lot of false positives if a single reuseport test fails. This is because expected_results and the result map are not cleared. Zero both after individual test runs, which fixes the mentioned false positives. Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Fixes: 91134d849a0e ("bpf: Test BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_REUSEPORT") --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/select_reuseport.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)