| Message ID | 20200210193049.64362-6-keescook@chromium.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | binfmt_elf: Update READ_IMPLIES_EXEC logic for modern CPUs | expand |
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 11:30:47AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > The READ_IMPLIES_EXEC work-around was designed for old toolchains that > lacked the ELF PT_GNU_STACK marking under the assumption that toolchains > that couldn't specify executable permission flags for the stack may not > know how to do it correctly for any memory region. > > This logic is sensible for having ancient binaries coexist in a system > with possibly NX memory, but was implemented in a way that equated having > a PT_GNU_STACK marked executable as being as "broken" as lacking the > PT_GNU_STACK marking entirely. Things like unmarked assembly and stack > trampolines may cause PT_GNU_STACK to need an executable bit, but they > do not imply all mappings must be executable. > > This confusion has led to situations where modern programs with explicitly > marked executable stack are forced into the READ_IMPLIES_EXEC state when > no such thing is needed. (And leads to unexpected failures when mmap()ing > regions of device driver memory that wish to disallow VM_EXEC[1].) > > In looking for other reasons for the READ_IMPLIES_EXEC behavior, Jann > Horn noted that glibc thread stacks have always been marked RWX (until > 2003 when they started tracking the PT_GNU_STACK flag instead[2]). And > musl doesn't support executable stacks at all[3]. As such, no breakage > for multithreaded applications is expected from this change. > > This changes arm32 and arm64 compat together, to keep behavior the same. > > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190418055759.GA3155@mellanox.com > [2] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=54ee14b3882 > [3] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190423192534.GN23599@brightrain.aerifal.cx > > Suggested-by: Hector Marco-Gisbert <hecmargi@upv.es> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/elf.c b/arch/arm/kernel/elf.c index 2f69cf978fe3..6965a673a141 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/elf.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/elf.c @@ -87,12 +87,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(elf_set_personality); * ELF: | | | * -------------------------------|------------| * missing GNU_STACK | exec-all | exec-all | - * GNU_STACK == RWX | exec-all | exec-all | + * GNU_STACK == RWX | exec-all | exec-stack | * GNU_STACK == RW | exec-all | exec-none | * * exec-all : all PROT_READ user mappings are executable, except when * backed by files on a noexec-filesystem. * exec-none : only PROT_EXEC user mappings are executable. + * exec-stack: only the stack and PROT_EXEC user mappings are executable. * * *this column has no architectural effect: NX markings are ignored by * hardware, but may have behavioral effects when "wants X" collides with @@ -102,7 +103,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(elf_set_personality); */ int arm_elf_read_implies_exec(int executable_stack) { - if (executable_stack != EXSTACK_DISABLE_X) + if (executable_stack == EXSTACK_DEFAULT) return 1; if (cpu_architecture() < CPU_ARCH_ARMv6) return 1; diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h index 7fc779e3f1ec..03ada29984a7 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h @@ -106,17 +106,18 @@ * ELF: | | | * -------------------------------|------------| * missing GNU_STACK | exec-all | exec-all | - * GNU_STACK == RWX | exec-all | exec-all | + * GNU_STACK == RWX | exec-stack | exec-stack | * GNU_STACK == RW | exec-none | exec-none | * * exec-all : all PROT_READ user mappings are executable, except when * backed by files on a noexec-filesystem. * exec-none : only PROT_EXEC user mappings are executable. + * exec-stack: only the stack and PROT_EXEC user mappings are executable. * * *all arm64 CPUs support NX, so there is no "lacks NX" column. * */ -#define elf_read_implies_exec(ex,stk) (stk != EXSTACK_DISABLE_X) +#define elf_read_implies_exec(ex,stk) (stk == EXSTACK_DEFAULT) #define CORE_DUMP_USE_REGSET #define ELF_EXEC_PAGESIZE PAGE_SIZE
The READ_IMPLIES_EXEC work-around was designed for old toolchains that lacked the ELF PT_GNU_STACK marking under the assumption that toolchains that couldn't specify executable permission flags for the stack may not know how to do it correctly for any memory region. This logic is sensible for having ancient binaries coexist in a system with possibly NX memory, but was implemented in a way that equated having a PT_GNU_STACK marked executable as being as "broken" as lacking the PT_GNU_STACK marking entirely. Things like unmarked assembly and stack trampolines may cause PT_GNU_STACK to need an executable bit, but they do not imply all mappings must be executable. This confusion has led to situations where modern programs with explicitly marked executable stack are forced into the READ_IMPLIES_EXEC state when no such thing is needed. (And leads to unexpected failures when mmap()ing regions of device driver memory that wish to disallow VM_EXEC[1].) In looking for other reasons for the READ_IMPLIES_EXEC behavior, Jann Horn noted that glibc thread stacks have always been marked RWX (until 2003 when they started tracking the PT_GNU_STACK flag instead[2]). And musl doesn't support executable stacks at all[3]. As such, no breakage for multithreaded applications is expected from this change. This changes arm32 and arm64 compat together, to keep behavior the same. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190418055759.GA3155@mellanox.com [2] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=54ee14b3882 [3] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190423192534.GN23599@brightrain.aerifal.cx Suggested-by: Hector Marco-Gisbert <hecmargi@upv.es> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> --- arch/arm/kernel/elf.c | 5 +++-- arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)