@@ -258,6 +258,27 @@ int seccomp(unsigned int op, unsigned int flags, void *args)
#define SIBLING_EXIT_FAILURE 0xbadface
#define SIBLING_EXIT_NEWPRIVS 0xbadfeed
+static int filecmp(pid_t pid1, pid_t pid2, int fd1, int fd2)
+{
+#ifdef __NR_kcmp
+ errno = 0;
+ return syscall(__NR_kcmp, pid1, pid2, KCMP_FILE, fd1, fd2);
+#else
+ errno = ENOSYS;
+ return -1;
+#endif
+}
+
+TEST(kcmp)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = filecmp(getpid(), getpid(), 1, 1);
+ EXPECT_EQ(ret, 0);
+ if (ret != 0 && errno == ENOSYS)
+ XFAIL(return, "Kernel does not support kcmp() (missing CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE?)");
+}
+
TEST(mode_strict_support)
{
long ret;
@@ -3606,16 +3627,6 @@ TEST(seccomp_get_notif_sizes)
EXPECT_EQ(sizes.seccomp_notif_resp, sizeof(struct seccomp_notif_resp));
}
-static int filecmp(pid_t pid1, pid_t pid2, int fd1, int fd2)
-{
-#ifdef __NR_kcmp
- return syscall(__NR_kcmp, pid1, pid2, KCMP_FILE, fd1, fd2);
-#else
- errno = ENOSYS;
- return -1;
-#endif
-}
-
TEST(user_notification_continue)
{
pid_t pid;
@@ -3640,20 +3651,20 @@ TEST(user_notification_continue)
int dup_fd, pipe_fds[2];
pid_t self;
- ret = pipe(pipe_fds);
- if (ret < 0)
- exit(1);
+ ASSERT_GE(pipe(pipe_fds), 0);
dup_fd = dup(pipe_fds[0]);
- if (dup_fd < 0)
- exit(1);
+ ASSERT_GE(dup_fd, 0);
+ EXPECT_NE(pipe_fds[0], dup_fd);
self = getpid();
-
ret = filecmp(self, self, pipe_fds[0], dup_fd);
- if (ret)
- exit(2);
-
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ if (ret < 0 && errno == ENOSYS) {
+ TH_LOG("kcmp() syscall missing (test is less accurate)");
+ } else
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+ }
exit(0);
}
@@ -3700,12 +3711,7 @@ TEST(user_notification_continue)
skip:
EXPECT_EQ(waitpid(pid, &status, 0), pid);
EXPECT_EQ(true, WIFEXITED(status));
- EXPECT_EQ(0, WEXITSTATUS(status)) {
- if (WEXITSTATUS(status) == 2) {
- XFAIL(return, "Kernel does not support kcmp() syscall");
- return;
- }
- }
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, WEXITSTATUS(status));
}
TEST(user_notification_filter_empty)
@@ -3847,7 +3853,7 @@ TEST(user_notification_sendfd)
{
pid_t pid;
long ret;
- int status, listener, memfd;
+ int status, listener, memfd, fd;
struct seccomp_notif_addfd addfd = {};
struct seccomp_notif req = {};
struct seccomp_notif_resp resp = {};
@@ -3880,34 +3886,56 @@ TEST(user_notification_sendfd)
addfd.size = sizeof(addfd);
addfd.srcfd = memfd;
- addfd.newfd_flags = O_CLOEXEC;
addfd.newfd = 0;
addfd.id = req.id;
- addfd.flags = 0xff;
+ addfd.flags = 0;
+
+ /* Verify bad newfd_flags cannot be set */
+ addfd.newfd_flags = ~O_CLOEXEC;
+ EXPECT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, &addfd), -1);
+ EXPECT_EQ(errno, EINVAL);
+ addfd.newfd_flags = O_CLOEXEC;
/* Verify bad flags cannot be set */
+ addfd.flags = 0xff;
EXPECT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, &addfd), -1);
EXPECT_EQ(errno, EINVAL);
+ addfd.flags = 0;
/* Verify that remote_fd cannot be set without setting flags */
- addfd.flags = 0;
addfd.newfd = 1;
EXPECT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, &addfd), -1);
EXPECT_EQ(errno, EINVAL);
-
- /* Verify we can set an arbitrary remote fd */
addfd.newfd = 0;
- ret = ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, &addfd);
- EXPECT_GE(ret, 0);
- EXPECT_EQ(filecmp(getpid(), pid, memfd, ret), 0);
+ /* Verify we can set an arbitrary remote fd */
+ fd = ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, &addfd);
+ /*
+ * The child has fds 0(stdin), 1(stdout), 2(stderr), 3(memfd),
+ * 4(listener), so the newly allocated fd should be 5.
+ */
+ EXPECT_EQ(fd, 5);
+ ret = filecmp(getpid(), pid, memfd, fd);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ if (ret < 0 && errno == ENOSYS) {
+ TH_LOG("kcmp() syscall missing (test is less accurate)");
+ } else
+ EXPECT_EQ(ret, 0);
+ }
/* Verify we can set a specific remote fd */
addfd.newfd = 42;
addfd.flags = SECCOMP_ADDFD_FLAG_SETFD;
- EXPECT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, &addfd), 42);
- EXPECT_EQ(filecmp(getpid(), pid, memfd, 42), 0);
+ fd = ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, &addfd);
+ EXPECT_EQ(fd, 42);
+ ret = filecmp(getpid(), pid, memfd, fd);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ if (ret < 0 && errno == ENOSYS) {
+ TH_LOG("kcmp() syscall missing (test is less accurate)");
+ } else
+ EXPECT_EQ(ret, 0);
+ }
resp.id = req.id;
resp.error = 0;
The seccomp tests are a bit noisy without CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE (due to missing the kcmp() syscall). The seccomp tests are more accurate with kcmp(), but it's not strictly required. Refactor the tests to use alternatives (comparing fd numbers), and provide a central test for kcmp() so there is a single XFAIL instead of many. Continue to produce warnings for the other tests, though. Additionally adds some more bad flag EINVAL tests to the addfd selftest. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 100 +++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)