Message ID | 20201218112428.13662-1-tklauser@distanz.ch (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | selftests/core: fix close_range_test build after XFAIL removal | expand |
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 12:24:28PM +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote: > XFAIL was removed in commit 9847d24af95c ("selftests/harness: Refactor > XFAIL into SKIP") and its use in close_range_test was already replaced > by commit 1d44d0dd61b6 ("selftests: core: use SKIP instead of XFAIL in > close_range_test.c"). However, commit 23afeaeff3d9 ("selftests: core: > add tests for CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC") introduced usage of XFAIL in > TEST(close_range_cloexec). Use SKIP there as well. > > Cc: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com> > Fixes: 23afeaeff3d9 ("selftests: core: add tests for CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC") > Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch> > --- Thanks for this! I already have a fix for this in my tree but I'm dropping it and taking yours instead. Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> Shuah, I'll be taking this through my tree since I'm adding selftests for a vfs regression fix that I'll be sending before Sunday. Christian
On 12/18/20 5:25 AM, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 12:24:28PM +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote: >> XFAIL was removed in commit 9847d24af95c ("selftests/harness: Refactor >> XFAIL into SKIP") and its use in close_range_test was already replaced >> by commit 1d44d0dd61b6 ("selftests: core: use SKIP instead of XFAIL in >> close_range_test.c"). However, commit 23afeaeff3d9 ("selftests: core: >> add tests for CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC") introduced usage of XFAIL in >> TEST(close_range_cloexec). Use SKIP there as well. >> >> Cc: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com> >> Fixes: 23afeaeff3d9 ("selftests: core: add tests for CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC") >> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch> >> --- > > Thanks for this! I already have a fix for this in my tree but I'm > dropping it and taking yours instead. > > Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> > > Shuah, I'll be taking this through my tree since I'm adding selftests > for a vfs regression fix that I'll be sending before Sunday. > > Christian > Thank you Christian thanks, -- Shuah
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/core/close_range_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/core/close_range_test.c index 87e16d65d9d7..670fb30d62f6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/core/close_range_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/core/close_range_test.c @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ TEST(close_range_cloexec) fd = open("/dev/null", O_RDONLY); ASSERT_GE(fd, 0) { if (errno == ENOENT) - XFAIL(return, "Skipping test since /dev/null does not exist"); + SKIP(return, "Skipping test since /dev/null does not exist"); } open_fds[i] = fd; @@ -250,9 +250,9 @@ TEST(close_range_cloexec) ret = sys_close_range(1000, 1000, CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC); if (ret < 0) { if (errno == ENOSYS) - XFAIL(return, "close_range() syscall not supported"); + SKIP(return, "close_range() syscall not supported"); if (errno == EINVAL) - XFAIL(return, "close_range() doesn't support CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC"); + SKIP(return, "close_range() doesn't support CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC"); } /* Ensure the FD_CLOEXEC bit is set also with a resource limit in place. */
XFAIL was removed in commit 9847d24af95c ("selftests/harness: Refactor XFAIL into SKIP") and its use in close_range_test was already replaced by commit 1d44d0dd61b6 ("selftests: core: use SKIP instead of XFAIL in close_range_test.c"). However, commit 23afeaeff3d9 ("selftests: core: add tests for CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC") introduced usage of XFAIL in TEST(close_range_cloexec). Use SKIP there as well. Cc: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com> Fixes: 23afeaeff3d9 ("selftests: core: add tests for CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC") Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch> --- tools/testing/selftests/core/close_range_test.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)