diff mbox series

[v2] selftests/bpf: enlarge select() timeout for test_maps

Message ID 20210819011506.27563-1-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 2d82d73da35b72b53fe0d96350a2b8d929d07e42
Headers show
Series [v2] selftests/bpf: enlarge select() timeout for test_maps | expand

Commit Message

Li Zhijian Aug. 19, 2021, 1:15 a.m. UTC 
0Day robot observed that it's easily timeout on a heavy load host.
-------------------
 # selftests: bpf: test_maps
 # Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
 # Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
 # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap'
 # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu'
 # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes'
 # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk'
 # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap'
 # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu'
 # Failed sockmap unexpected timeout
 not ok 3 selftests: bpf: test_maps # exit=1
 # selftests: bpf: test_lru_map
 # nr_cpus:8
-------------------
Since this test will be scheduled by 0Day to a random host that could have
only a few cpus(2-8), enlarge the timeout to avoid a false NG report.

In practice, i tried to pin it to only one cpu by 'taskset 0x01 ./test_maps',
and knew 10S is likely enough, but i still perfer to a larger value 30.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>

---
V2: update to 30 seconds
3S is not enough sometimes on a very busy host
taskset 1,1 ./test_maps 9
Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu'
Failed sockmap unexpected timeout

taskset 1,1 ./test_maps 10
Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu'
Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu'
test_array_map_batch_ops:PASS
test_array_percpu_map_batch_ops:PASS
test_htab_map_batch_ops:PASS
test_htab_percpu_map_batch_ops:PASS
test_lpm_trie_map_batch_ops:PASS
test_sk_storage_map:PASS
test_maps: OK, 0 SKIPPED

taskset 0x01 ./test_maps 9
Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu'
Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu'
test_array_map_batch_ops:PASS
test_array_percpu_map_batch_ops:PASS
test_htab_map_batch_ops:PASS
test_htab_percpu_map_batch_ops:PASS
test_lpm_trie_map_batch_ops:PASS
test_sk_storage_map:PASS
test_maps: OK, 0 SKIPPED

taskset 0x01 ./test_maps 10
Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu'
Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap'
Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu'
test_array_map_batch_ops:PASS
test_array_percpu_map_batch_ops:PASS
test_htab_map_batch_ops:PASS
test_htab_percpu_map_batch_ops:PASS
test_lpm_trie_map_batch_ops:PASS
test_sk_storage_map:PASS
test_maps: OK, 0 SKIPPED

Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Song Liu Aug. 19, 2021, 1:21 a.m. UTC | #1 
> On Aug 18, 2021, at 6:15 PM, Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> 0Day robot observed that it's easily timeout on a heavy load host.
> -------------------
> # selftests: bpf: test_maps
> # Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
> # Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
> # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap'
> # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu'
> # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes'
> # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk'
> # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap'
> # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu'
> # Failed sockmap unexpected timeout
> not ok 3 selftests: bpf: test_maps # exit=1
> # selftests: bpf: test_lru_map
> # nr_cpus:8
> -------------------
> Since this test will be scheduled by 0Day to a random host that could have
> only a few cpus(2-8), enlarge the timeout to avoid a false NG report.
> 
> In practice, i tried to pin it to only one cpu by 'taskset 0x01 ./test_maps',
> and knew 10S is likely enough, but i still perfer to a larger value 30.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
index 30cbf5d98f7d..de58a3070eea 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
@@ -985,7 +985,7 @@  static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data)
 
 		FD_ZERO(&w);
 		FD_SET(sfd[3], &w);
-		to.tv_sec = 1;
+		to.tv_sec = 30;
 		to.tv_usec = 0;
 		s = select(sfd[3] + 1, &w, NULL, NULL, &to);
 		if (s == -1) {