diff mbox series

[linux-next] tools/net: Use bitwise instead of arithmetic operator for flags

Message ID 20210820033527.13210-1-jing.yangyang@zte.com.cn (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit fa16ee77364f03d8565e5adeff1b119b29acca69
Headers show
Series [linux-next] tools/net: Use bitwise instead of arithmetic operator for flags | expand

Commit Message

CGEL Aug. 20, 2021, 3:35 a.m. UTC
From: jing yangyang <jing.yangyang@zte.com.cn>

This silences the following coccinelle warning:

"WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |"

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: jing yangyang <jing.yangyang@zte.com.cn>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_fanout.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Aug. 20, 2021, 2 p.m. UTC | #1
Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 20:35:27 -0700 you wrote:
> From: jing yangyang <jing.yangyang@zte.com.cn>
> 
> This silences the following coccinelle warning:
> 
> "WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |"
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: jing yangyang <jing.yangyang@zte.com.cn>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [linux-next] tools/net: Use bitwise instead of arithmetic operator for flags
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/fa16ee77364f

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_fanout.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_fanout.c
index db45213..3653d64 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_fanout.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_fanout.c
@@ -111,8 +111,8 @@  static int sock_fanout_open(uint16_t typeflags, uint16_t group_id)
 static void sock_fanout_set_cbpf(int fd)
 {
 	struct sock_filter bpf_filter[] = {
-		BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_B+BPF_ABS, 80),	      /* ldb [80] */
-		BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_A, 0),		      /* ret A */
+		BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_B | BPF_ABS, 80),	      /* ldb [80] */
+		BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0),		      /* ret A */
 	};
 	struct sock_fprog bpf_prog;