Message ID | 20210926223322.848641-2-isabellabdoamaral@usp.br (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | test_hash.c: refactor into KUnit | expand |
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 6:33 AM Isabella Basso <isabellabdoamaral@usp.br> wrote: > > Currently, there exist hash_32() and __hash_32() functions, which were > introduced in a patch [1] targeting architecture specific optimizations. > These functions can be overridden on a per-architecture basis to achieve > such optimizations. They must set their corresponding define directive > (HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 and HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32, respectively) so that header > files can deal with these overrides properly. > > As the supported 32-bit architectures that have their own hash function > implementation (i.e. m68k, Microblaze, H8/300, pa-risc) have only been > making use of the (more general) __hash_32() function (which only lacks > a right shift operation when compared to the hash_32() function), > remove the define directive corresponding to the arch-specific hash_32() > implementation. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20160525073311.5600.qmail@ns.sciencehorizons.net/ > > Changes since v1: > - As suggested by David Gow: > 1. Reword commit message. Maybe move this changelog to below the "---", so it doesn't show up in the final commit message? > > Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> > Co-developed-by: Augusto Durães Camargo <augusto.duraes33@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Augusto Durães Camargo <augusto.duraes33@gmail.com> > Co-developed-by: Enzo Ferreira <ferreiraenzoa@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Enzo Ferreira <ferreiraenzoa@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Isabella Basso <isabellabdoamaral@usp.br> > --- This looks sensible enough to me. Since no-one seems to be speaking up in architecture-specific hash_32()'s defence, let's get rid of it. Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Cheers, -- David > include/linux/hash.h | 5 +---- > lib/test_hash.c | 24 +----------------------- > tools/include/linux/hash.h | 5 +---- > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/hash.h b/include/linux/hash.h > index ad6fa21d977b..38edaa08f862 100644 > --- a/include/linux/hash.h > +++ b/include/linux/hash.h > @@ -62,10 +62,7 @@ static inline u32 __hash_32_generic(u32 val) > return val * GOLDEN_RATIO_32; > } > > -#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 > -#define hash_32 hash_32_generic > -#endif > -static inline u32 hash_32_generic(u32 val, unsigned int bits) > +static inline u32 hash_32(u32 val, unsigned int bits) > { > /* High bits are more random, so use them. */ > return __hash_32(val) >> (32 - bits); > diff --git a/lib/test_hash.c b/lib/test_hash.c > index 0ee40b4a56dd..d4b0cfdb0377 100644 > --- a/lib/test_hash.c > +++ b/lib/test_hash.c > @@ -94,22 +94,7 @@ test_int_hash(unsigned long long h64, u32 hash_or[2][33]) > pr_err("hash_32(%#x, %d) = %#x > %#x", h0, k, h1, m); > return false; > } > -#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 > - h2 = hash_32_generic(h0, k); > -#if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 == 1 > - if (h1 != h2) { > - pr_err("hash_32(%#x, %d) = %#x != hash_32_generic() " > - " = %#x", h0, k, h1, h2); > - return false; > - } > -#else > - if (h2 > m) { > - pr_err("hash_32_generic(%#x, %d) = %#x > %#x", > - h0, k, h1, m); > - return false; > - } > -#endif > -#endif > + > /* Test hash_64 */ > hash_or[1][k] |= h1 = hash_64(h64, k); > if (h1 > m) { > @@ -227,13 +212,6 @@ test_hash_init(void) > #else > pr_info("__hash_32() has no arch implementation to test."); > #endif > -#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 > -#if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1 > - pr_info("hash_32() is arch-specific; not compared to generic."); > -#endif > -#else > - pr_info("hash_32() has no arch implementation to test."); > -#endif > #ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 > #if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1 > pr_info("hash_64() is arch-specific; not compared to generic."); > diff --git a/tools/include/linux/hash.h b/tools/include/linux/hash.h > index ad6fa21d977b..38edaa08f862 100644 > --- a/tools/include/linux/hash.h > +++ b/tools/include/linux/hash.h > @@ -62,10 +62,7 @@ static inline u32 __hash_32_generic(u32 val) > return val * GOLDEN_RATIO_32; > } > > -#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 > -#define hash_32 hash_32_generic > -#endif > -static inline u32 hash_32_generic(u32 val, unsigned int bits) > +static inline u32 hash_32(u32 val, unsigned int bits) > { > /* High bits are more random, so use them. */ > return __hash_32(val) >> (32 - bits); > -- > 2.33.0 >
Hi, David, On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 4:20 AM David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 6:33 AM Isabella Basso <isabellabdoamaral@usp.br> wrote: > > > > Currently, there exist hash_32() and __hash_32() functions, which were > > introduced in a patch [1] targeting architecture specific optimizations. > > These functions can be overridden on a per-architecture basis to achieve > > such optimizations. They must set their corresponding define directive > > (HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 and HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32, respectively) so that header > > files can deal with these overrides properly. > > > > As the supported 32-bit architectures that have their own hash function > > implementation (i.e. m68k, Microblaze, H8/300, pa-risc) have only been > > making use of the (more general) __hash_32() function (which only lacks > > a right shift operation when compared to the hash_32() function), > > remove the define directive corresponding to the arch-specific hash_32() > > implementation. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20160525073311.5600.qmail@ns.sciencehorizons.net/ > > > > Changes since v1: > > - As suggested by David Gow: > > 1. Reword commit message. > > Maybe move this changelog to below the "---", so it doesn't show up in > the final commit message? Oh, okay! Thanks for pointing that out :) I didn't quite know how I should put these. > > > > > Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> > > Co-developed-by: Augusto Durães Camargo <augusto.duraes33@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Augusto Durães Camargo <augusto.duraes33@gmail.com> > > Co-developed-by: Enzo Ferreira <ferreiraenzoa@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Enzo Ferreira <ferreiraenzoa@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Isabella Basso <isabellabdoamaral@usp.br> > > --- > > This looks sensible enough to me. Since no-one seems to be speaking up > in architecture-specific hash_32()'s defence, let's get rid of it. > > Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> > Alright! Thanks for the review. Cheers, -- Isabella B. > > > include/linux/hash.h | 5 +---- > > lib/test_hash.c | 24 +----------------------- > > tools/include/linux/hash.h | 5 +---- > > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/hash.h b/include/linux/hash.h > > index ad6fa21d977b..38edaa08f862 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/hash.h > > +++ b/include/linux/hash.h > > @@ -62,10 +62,7 @@ static inline u32 __hash_32_generic(u32 val) > > return val * GOLDEN_RATIO_32; > > } > > > > -#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 > > -#define hash_32 hash_32_generic > > -#endif > > -static inline u32 hash_32_generic(u32 val, unsigned int bits) > > +static inline u32 hash_32(u32 val, unsigned int bits) > > { > > /* High bits are more random, so use them. */ > > return __hash_32(val) >> (32 - bits); > > diff --git a/lib/test_hash.c b/lib/test_hash.c > > index 0ee40b4a56dd..d4b0cfdb0377 100644 > > --- a/lib/test_hash.c > > +++ b/lib/test_hash.c > > @@ -94,22 +94,7 @@ test_int_hash(unsigned long long h64, u32 hash_or[2][33]) > > pr_err("hash_32(%#x, %d) = %#x > %#x", h0, k, h1, m); > > return false; > > } > > -#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 > > - h2 = hash_32_generic(h0, k); > > -#if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 == 1 > > - if (h1 != h2) { > > - pr_err("hash_32(%#x, %d) = %#x != hash_32_generic() " > > - " = %#x", h0, k, h1, h2); > > - return false; > > - } > > -#else > > - if (h2 > m) { > > - pr_err("hash_32_generic(%#x, %d) = %#x > %#x", > > - h0, k, h1, m); > > - return false; > > - } > > -#endif > > -#endif > > + > > /* Test hash_64 */ > > hash_or[1][k] |= h1 = hash_64(h64, k); > > if (h1 > m) { > > @@ -227,13 +212,6 @@ test_hash_init(void) > > #else > > pr_info("__hash_32() has no arch implementation to test."); > > #endif > > -#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 > > -#if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1 > > - pr_info("hash_32() is arch-specific; not compared to generic."); > > -#endif > > -#else > > - pr_info("hash_32() has no arch implementation to test."); > > -#endif > > #ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 > > #if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1 > > pr_info("hash_64() is arch-specific; not compared to generic."); > > diff --git a/tools/include/linux/hash.h b/tools/include/linux/hash.h > > index ad6fa21d977b..38edaa08f862 100644 > > --- a/tools/include/linux/hash.h > > +++ b/tools/include/linux/hash.h > > @@ -62,10 +62,7 @@ static inline u32 __hash_32_generic(u32 val) > > return val * GOLDEN_RATIO_32; > > } > > > > -#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 > > -#define hash_32 hash_32_generic > > -#endif > > -static inline u32 hash_32_generic(u32 val, unsigned int bits) > > +static inline u32 hash_32(u32 val, unsigned int bits) > > { > > /* High bits are more random, so use them. */ > > return __hash_32(val) >> (32 - bits); > > -- > > 2.33.0 > >
diff --git a/include/linux/hash.h b/include/linux/hash.h index ad6fa21d977b..38edaa08f862 100644 --- a/include/linux/hash.h +++ b/include/linux/hash.h @@ -62,10 +62,7 @@ static inline u32 __hash_32_generic(u32 val) return val * GOLDEN_RATIO_32; } -#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 -#define hash_32 hash_32_generic -#endif -static inline u32 hash_32_generic(u32 val, unsigned int bits) +static inline u32 hash_32(u32 val, unsigned int bits) { /* High bits are more random, so use them. */ return __hash_32(val) >> (32 - bits); diff --git a/lib/test_hash.c b/lib/test_hash.c index 0ee40b4a56dd..d4b0cfdb0377 100644 --- a/lib/test_hash.c +++ b/lib/test_hash.c @@ -94,22 +94,7 @@ test_int_hash(unsigned long long h64, u32 hash_or[2][33]) pr_err("hash_32(%#x, %d) = %#x > %#x", h0, k, h1, m); return false; } -#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 - h2 = hash_32_generic(h0, k); -#if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 == 1 - if (h1 != h2) { - pr_err("hash_32(%#x, %d) = %#x != hash_32_generic() " - " = %#x", h0, k, h1, h2); - return false; - } -#else - if (h2 > m) { - pr_err("hash_32_generic(%#x, %d) = %#x > %#x", - h0, k, h1, m); - return false; - } -#endif -#endif + /* Test hash_64 */ hash_or[1][k] |= h1 = hash_64(h64, k); if (h1 > m) { @@ -227,13 +212,6 @@ test_hash_init(void) #else pr_info("__hash_32() has no arch implementation to test."); #endif -#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 -#if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1 - pr_info("hash_32() is arch-specific; not compared to generic."); -#endif -#else - pr_info("hash_32() has no arch implementation to test."); -#endif #ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 #if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1 pr_info("hash_64() is arch-specific; not compared to generic."); diff --git a/tools/include/linux/hash.h b/tools/include/linux/hash.h index ad6fa21d977b..38edaa08f862 100644 --- a/tools/include/linux/hash.h +++ b/tools/include/linux/hash.h @@ -62,10 +62,7 @@ static inline u32 __hash_32_generic(u32 val) return val * GOLDEN_RATIO_32; } -#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 -#define hash_32 hash_32_generic -#endif -static inline u32 hash_32_generic(u32 val, unsigned int bits) +static inline u32 hash_32(u32 val, unsigned int bits) { /* High bits are more random, so use them. */ return __hash_32(val) >> (32 - bits);