Message ID | 20211102073014.2901870-4-davidgow@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 44b7da5fcd4c99de1ec5cc783cdd605398246280 |
Delegated to: | Brendan Higgins |
Headers | show |
Series | [v4,1/4] kunit: tool: Do not error on tests without test plans | expand |
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 3:30 AM David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote: > > Currently, the results for individial parameters in a parameterised test > are simply output as (K)TAP diagnostic lines. > > As kunit_tool now supports nested subtests, report each parameter as its > own subtest. > > For example, here's what the output now looks like: > # Subtest: inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding > ok 1 - 1901-12-13 Lower bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits > ok 2 - 1969-12-31 Upper bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits > ok 3 - 1970-01-01 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits > ok 4 - 2038-01-19 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits > ok 5 - 2038-01-19 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on > ok 6 - 2106-02-07 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on > ok 7 - 2106-02-07 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on > ok 8 - 2174-02-25 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on > ok 9 - 2174-02-25 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on > ok 10 - 2242-03-16 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on > ok 11 - 2242-03-16 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on > ok 12 - 2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on > ok 13 - 2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit>=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit 1. 1 ns > ok 14 - 2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit>= timestamp. Extra sec bits 1. Max ns > ok 15 - 2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra sec bits on > ok 16 - 2446-05-10 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra sec bits on > # inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16 > ok 1 - inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding > > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index f96498ede2cc..c7ed4aabec04 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -512,6 +512,8 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) /* Get initial param. */ param_desc[0] = '\0'; test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL, param_desc); + kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT + "# Subtest: %s", test_case->name); while (test.param_value) { kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test); @@ -522,9 +524,8 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) } kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, - KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT - "# %s: %s %d - %s", - test_case->name, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT + "%s %d - %s", kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(test.status), test.param_index + 1, param_desc);