Message ID | 20220210023519.3221051-3-frowand.list@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Documentation: dev-tools: clarify KTAP specification wording | expand |
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 10:35 AM <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> > > Convert "Major differences between TAP and KTAP" from a bullet list > to a table. The bullet list was being formatted as a single > paragraph. > > Add missing required argument in code-block directives. > > --- > > Table conversion suggested by Shuah. > > Patch 2/2 not previously reviewed, so Reviewed-by tags not provided. > > Changes since version 3 > - Add this commit (patch 2/2) to the series > > Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> > --- The table looks good to me, the "none" argument in code-block directives is already fixed in another patch. The table bits are: Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Cheers, -- David > Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst | 33 +++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst > index dfb3f10a8b2d..5ee735c6687f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Test case result lines > Test case result lines indicate the final status of a test. > They are required and must have the format: > > -.. code-block:: > +.. code-block:: none These code-block changes were already submitted in: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220131003637.14274-1-rdunlap@infradead.org/T/ > > <result> <number> [<description>][ # [<directive>] [<diagnostic data>]] > > @@ -117,32 +117,32 @@ separator. > > Example result lines include: > > -.. code-block:: > +.. code-block:: none > > ok 1 test_case_name > > The test "test_case_name" passed. > > -.. code-block:: > +.. code-block:: none > > not ok 1 test_case_name > > The test "test_case_name" failed. > > -.. code-block:: > +.. code-block:: none > > ok 1 test # SKIP necessary dependency unavailable > > The test "test" was SKIPPED with the diagnostic message "necessary dependency > unavailable". > > -.. code-block:: > +.. code-block:: none > > not ok 1 test # TIMEOUT 30 seconds > > The test "test" timed out, with diagnostic data "30 seconds". > > -.. code-block:: > +.. code-block:: none > > ok 5 check return code # rcode=0 > > @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ allowed to be either indented or not indented. > > An example of a test with two nested subtests: > > -.. code-block:: > +.. code-block:: none > > KTAP version 1 > 1..1 > @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ An example of a test with two nested subtests: > > An example format with multiple levels of nested testing: > > -.. code-block:: > +.. code-block:: none > > KTAP version 1 > 1..2 > @@ -234,12 +234,15 @@ An example format with multiple levels of nested testing: > Major differences between TAP and KTAP > -------------------------------------- > > -Note the major differences between the TAP and KTAP specification: > -- yaml and json are not recommended in KTAP diagnostic messages > -- TODO directive not recognized in KTAP > -- KTAP allows for an arbitrary number of tests to be nested > -- TAP includes "Unknown lines" in the category of "Anything else" > -- TAP says "Unknown lines" are "incorrect"; KTAP allows "Unknown lines" > +================================================== ========= =============== > +Feature TAP KTAP > +================================================== ========= =============== > +yaml and json in diagnosic message ok not recommended > +TODO directive ok not recognized > +allows an arbitrary number of tests to be nested no yes > +"Unknown lines" are in category of "Anything else" yes no > +"Unknown lines" are incorrect allowed > +================================================== ========= =============== This looks good to me, thanks! > > The TAP14 specification does permit nested tests, but instead of using another > nested version line, uses a line of the form > @@ -247,7 +250,7 @@ nested version line, uses a line of the form > > Example KTAP output > -------------------- > -.. code-block:: > +.. code-block:: none > > KTAP version 1 > 1..1 > -- > Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> >
On 2/9/22 7:35 PM, frowand.list@gmail.com wrote: > From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> > > Convert "Major differences between TAP and KTAP" from a bullet list > to a table. The bullet list was being formatted as a single > paragraph. > > Add missing required argument in code-block directives. > > --- > > Table conversion suggested by Shuah. > > Patch 2/2 not previously reviewed, so Reviewed-by tags not provided. > > Changes since version 3 > - Add this commit (patch 2/2) to the series > > Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> > --- > Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst | 33 +++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst > index dfb3f10a8b2d..5ee735c6687f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Test case result lines > Test case result lines indicate the final status of a test. > They are required and must have the format: > > -.. code-block:: > +.. code-block:: none > > <result> <number> [<description>][ # [<directive>] [<diagnostic data>]] > > @@ -117,32 +117,32 @@ separator. > > Example result lines include: > > -.. code-block:: > +.. code-block:: none > > ok 1 test_case_name > > The test "test_case_name" passed. > > -.. code-block:: > +.. code-block:: none > > not ok 1 test_case_name > > The test "test_case_name" failed. > > -.. code-block:: > +.. code-block:: none > > ok 1 test # SKIP necessary dependency unavailable > > The test "test" was SKIPPED with the diagnostic message "necessary dependency > unavailable". > > -.. code-block:: > +.. code-block:: none > > not ok 1 test # TIMEOUT 30 seconds > > The test "test" timed out, with diagnostic data "30 seconds". > > -.. code-block:: > +.. code-block:: none > > ok 5 check return code # rcode=0 > > @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ allowed to be either indented or not indented. > > An example of a test with two nested subtests: > > -.. code-block:: > +.. code-block:: none > > KTAP version 1 > 1..1 > @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ An example of a test with two nested subtests: > > An example format with multiple levels of nested testing: > > -.. code-block:: > +.. code-block:: none > > KTAP version 1 > 1..2 > @@ -234,12 +234,15 @@ An example format with multiple levels of nested testing: > Major differences between TAP and KTAP > -------------------------------------- > > -Note the major differences between the TAP and KTAP specification: > -- yaml and json are not recommended in KTAP diagnostic messages > -- TODO directive not recognized in KTAP > -- KTAP allows for an arbitrary number of tests to be nested > -- TAP includes "Unknown lines" in the category of "Anything else" > -- TAP says "Unknown lines" are "incorrect"; KTAP allows "Unknown lines" > +================================================== ========= =============== > +Feature TAP KTAP > +================================================== ========= =============== > +yaml and json in diagnosic message ok not recommended > +TODO directive ok not recognized > +allows an arbitrary number of tests to be nested no yes > +"Unknown lines" are in category of "Anything else" yes no > +"Unknown lines" are incorrect allowed > +================================================== ========= =============== > > The TAP14 specification does permit nested tests, but instead of using another > nested version line, uses a line of the form > @@ -247,7 +250,7 @@ nested version line, uses a line of the form > > Example KTAP output > -------------------- > -.. code-block:: > +.. code-block:: none > > KTAP version 1 > 1..1 > Table looks good. Thanks for adding it. The two patches could be collapsed into one perhaps? Either way: Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> thanks, -- Shuah
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:35:19PM -0600, frowand.list@gmail.com wrote: > From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> > > Convert "Major differences between TAP and KTAP" from a bullet list > to a table. The bullet list was being formatted as a single > paragraph. > > Add missing required argument in code-block directives. > > --- > > Table conversion suggested by Shuah. > > Patch 2/2 not previously reviewed, so Reviewed-by tags not provided. > > Changes since version 3 > - Add this commit (patch 2/2) to the series > > Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst index dfb3f10a8b2d..5ee735c6687f 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Test case result lines Test case result lines indicate the final status of a test. They are required and must have the format: -.. code-block:: +.. code-block:: none <result> <number> [<description>][ # [<directive>] [<diagnostic data>]] @@ -117,32 +117,32 @@ separator. Example result lines include: -.. code-block:: +.. code-block:: none ok 1 test_case_name The test "test_case_name" passed. -.. code-block:: +.. code-block:: none not ok 1 test_case_name The test "test_case_name" failed. -.. code-block:: +.. code-block:: none ok 1 test # SKIP necessary dependency unavailable The test "test" was SKIPPED with the diagnostic message "necessary dependency unavailable". -.. code-block:: +.. code-block:: none not ok 1 test # TIMEOUT 30 seconds The test "test" timed out, with diagnostic data "30 seconds". -.. code-block:: +.. code-block:: none ok 5 check return code # rcode=0 @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ allowed to be either indented or not indented. An example of a test with two nested subtests: -.. code-block:: +.. code-block:: none KTAP version 1 1..1 @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ An example of a test with two nested subtests: An example format with multiple levels of nested testing: -.. code-block:: +.. code-block:: none KTAP version 1 1..2 @@ -234,12 +234,15 @@ An example format with multiple levels of nested testing: Major differences between TAP and KTAP -------------------------------------- -Note the major differences between the TAP and KTAP specification: -- yaml and json are not recommended in KTAP diagnostic messages -- TODO directive not recognized in KTAP -- KTAP allows for an arbitrary number of tests to be nested -- TAP includes "Unknown lines" in the category of "Anything else" -- TAP says "Unknown lines" are "incorrect"; KTAP allows "Unknown lines" +================================================== ========= =============== +Feature TAP KTAP +================================================== ========= =============== +yaml and json in diagnosic message ok not recommended +TODO directive ok not recognized +allows an arbitrary number of tests to be nested no yes +"Unknown lines" are in category of "Anything else" yes no +"Unknown lines" are incorrect allowed +================================================== ========= =============== The TAP14 specification does permit nested tests, but instead of using another nested version line, uses a line of the form @@ -247,7 +250,7 @@ nested version line, uses a line of the form Example KTAP output -------------------- -.. code-block:: +.. code-block:: none KTAP version 1 1..1