diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v3,04/27] bpf: selftests: No need to include bpf_rlimit.h in flow_dissector_load

Message ID 20220405130858.12165-5-laoar.shao@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series bpf: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK cleanups | expand

Commit Message

Yafang Shao April 5, 2022, 1:08 p.m. UTC 
We have set libbpf 1.0 API mode explicitly, so don't need to include the
header bpf_rlimit.h any more. This patch also removes the check of the
return value of libbpf_set_strict_mode as it always return 0.

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/flow_dissector_load.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/flow_dissector_load.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/flow_dissector_load.c
index 87fd1aa323a9..c8be6406777f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/flow_dissector_load.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/flow_dissector_load.c
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ 
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
 
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "flow_dissector_load.h"
 
 const char *cfg_pin_path = "/sys/fs/bpf/flow_dissector";
@@ -25,9 +24,8 @@  static void load_and_attach_program(void)
 	int prog_fd, ret;
 	struct bpf_object *obj;
 
-	ret = libbpf_set_strict_mode(LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL);
-	if (ret)
-		error(1, 0, "failed to enable libbpf strict mode: %d", ret);
+	/* Use libbpf 1.0 API mode */
+	libbpf_set_strict_mode(LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL);
 
 	ret = bpf_flow_load(&obj, cfg_path_name, cfg_prog_name,
 			    cfg_map_name, NULL, &prog_fd, NULL);