From patchwork Sat Jul 9 03:19:57 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: David Gow X-Patchwork-Id: 12912040 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8915BCCA47C for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2022 03:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229540AbiGIDUP (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2022 23:20:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50464 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229463AbiGIDUN (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2022 23:20:13 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-x114a.google.com (mail-yw1-x114a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::114a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4F1E66BA3 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 20:20:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-x114a.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-31c8a5d51adso4327067b3.14 for ; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 20:20:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NSq+v/AerT1u/xIehHjLvE9afDtIY4Z4+byU67UBipA=; b=C1hGF38gKNg0xkmrhQb1GK6dUD3uqQPk+WcY/onbwQ/wLlkz0YYTjxf5Mtvth4iZHV Erjj5X5XWxHLFMN4taQtCwYgLvyrDTcgwPRd4/BkMPOMwDeNSEooD2Wk+LbDFgoFsGBw +fP03GWC98UKBmCUkHLgcXaWo80ni8EZc6Y8vVrxgWlWj4b/Ak0TMO9CcsL6mmRQ+wPC Phfi+KeJ89SFk2iVoaC0kcc3wX2uBLedkSXTiiMfvBMS3k0Iqb11qXZcxdDlGAiuNv6O h4fv2NkBCIu4kTho6sNWTArPkFSJylF0UVLzAACI1fxP62/HMibHguGjnnzIVDLv8FHo Hozg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NSq+v/AerT1u/xIehHjLvE9afDtIY4Z4+byU67UBipA=; b=B0D2lD7FyPP0m7kIODpkdYjr3Gn2dWm1foWceCsreQU6VcRGE0NGughbdS+Sboh2hu 7Zr0CjDsRvlozWK/kNDPfjqxTmfOy/mikkItvNKfptgt888S78Lz8IYfXtOxdO64eIeX Uu4nZt4BeQhKOYw8uC1toOUkxP1sWNsGPTwLued78VQU6VHj6Q+WZrf9BbM7dDtKFFq3 m83ciDPBZ1yj4Te0n4L4Qf03874g2f/7jdStoGERqBr+rPu35/Llfw6KSz2E3R1Hvwjq AjoQkRKtx34+EvPw6zP6PGNCO36zOixZ5Rwgibmtjs9rvhi+W1ZYQVmWxGPvlXKwYqcu Mfdg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/afTmED2JN80brGlp6okU622wOezudlCAHjJOXOnz+Y1udDYPx H/7I+KJsZkokSrJV95pgcEmEycB/me/JQA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vou50vKvBnLbzyy4WqV2zZGxb2PYevY4SXQ9Hp/LqGCgVoWf1NqFWpAYI7GfNkaDyOVIsw+0/VrA1Jbw== X-Received: from slicestar.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:4f:4b78:c0a8:20a1]) (user=davidgow job=sendgmr) by 2002:a0d:e2d2:0:b0:31c:82a3:2bc8 with SMTP id l201-20020a0de2d2000000b0031c82a32bc8mr7611840ywe.304.1657336810994; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 20:20:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2022 11:19:57 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20220709032001.819487-1-davidgow@google.com> Message-Id: <20220709032001.819487-2-davidgow@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220709032001.819487-1-davidgow@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] kunit: unify module and builtin suite definitions From: David Gow To: Brendan Higgins , Luis Chamberlain , Jeremy Kerr , Daniel Latypov , Shuah Khan , Andrew Jeffery , Mika Westerberg , Andra Paraschiv , Longpeng , Greg KH Cc: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, " =?utf-8?q?Ma=C3=ADra_Canal?= " , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, Matt Johnston , David Gow Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org From: Jeremy Kerr Currently, KUnit runs built-in tests and tests loaded from modules differently. For built-in tests, the kunit_test_suite{,s}() macro adds a list of suites in the .kunit_test_suites linker section. However, for kernel modules, a module_init() function is used to run the test suites. This causes problems if tests are included in a module which already defines module_init/exit_module functions, as they'll conflict with the kunit-provided ones. This change removes the kunit-defined module inits, and instead parses the kunit tests from their own section in the module. After module init, we call __kunit_test_suites_init() on the contents of that section, which prepares and runs the suite. This essentially unifies the module- and non-module kunit init formats. Tested-by: Maíra Canal Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Signed-off-by: David Gow --- Changes since v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220625050838.1618469-2-davidgow@google.com/ - Rebase on top of the TAINT_TEST patch series. This should now apply cleanly on top of the kunit branch: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220708044847.531566-1-davidgow@google.com/T/#u - Add Brendan's Reviewed-by tags. No changes to this patch since v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220621085345.603820-2-davidgow@google.com/ Changes since v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220618090310.1174932-2-davidgow@google.com/ - Fix a compile error with CONFIG_KUNIT=m (Thanks Christophe Leroy, kernel test robot) - Add Maíra's Tested-by. Changes since RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/101d12fc9250b7a445ff50a9e7a25cd74d0e16eb.camel@codeconstruct.com.au/ - I've basically just rebased it, tweaked some wording, and it made it still compile when CONFIG_MODULES is not set. --- include/kunit/test.h | 49 +++++---------------------------------- include/linux/module.h | 5 ++++ kernel/module/main.c | 6 +++++ lib/kunit/test.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 7646d1bcf685..cb155d3da284 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -250,42 +250,9 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void) } #endif /* IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) */ -#ifdef MODULE -/** - * kunit_test_suites_for_module() - used to register one or more - * &struct kunit_suite with KUnit. - * - * @__suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite. - * - * Registers @__suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for - * more information. - * - * If a test suite is built-in, module_init() gets translated into - * an initcall which we don't want as the idea is that for builtins - * the executor will manage execution. So ensure we do not define - * module_{init|exit} functions for the builtin case when registering - * suites via kunit_test_suites() below. - */ -#define kunit_test_suites_for_module(__suites) \ - static int __init kunit_test_suites_init(void) \ - { \ - return __kunit_test_suites_init(__suites); \ - } \ - module_init(kunit_test_suites_init); \ - \ - static void __exit kunit_test_suites_exit(void) \ - { \ - return __kunit_test_suites_exit(__suites); \ - } \ - module_exit(kunit_test_suites_exit) \ - MODULE_INFO(test, "Y"); -#else -#define kunit_test_suites_for_module(__suites) -#endif /* MODULE */ - #define __kunit_test_suites(unique_array, unique_suites, ...) \ + MODULE_INFO(test, "Y"); \ static struct kunit_suite *unique_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__, NULL }; \ - kunit_test_suites_for_module(unique_array); \ static struct kunit_suite **unique_suites \ __used __section(".kunit_test_suites") = unique_array @@ -295,16 +262,12 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void) * * @__suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite. * - * Registers @suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for - * more information. - * - * When builtin, KUnit tests are all run via executor; this is done - * by placing the array of struct kunit_suite * in the .kunit_test_suites - * ELF section. + * Registers @suites with the test framework. + * This is done by placing the array of struct kunit_suite * in the + * .kunit_test_suites ELF section. * - * An alternative is to build the tests as a module. Because modules do not - * support multiple initcall()s, we need to initialize an array of suites for a - * module. + * When builtin, KUnit tests are all run via the executor at boot, and when + * built as a module, they run on module load. * */ #define kunit_test_suites(__suites...) \ diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h index abd9fa916b7d..2490223c975d 100644 --- a/include/linux/module.h +++ b/include/linux/module.h @@ -505,6 +505,11 @@ struct module { int num_static_call_sites; struct static_call_site *static_call_sites; #endif +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT) + int num_kunit_suites; + struct kunit_suite ***kunit_suites; +#endif + #ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH bool klp; /* Is this a livepatch module? */ diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c index fed58d30725d..4542db7cdf54 100644 --- a/kernel/module/main.c +++ b/kernel/module/main.c @@ -2087,6 +2087,12 @@ static int find_module_sections(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info) sizeof(*mod->static_call_sites), &mod->num_static_call_sites); #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_KUNIT + mod->kunit_suites = section_objs(info, ".kunit_test_suites", + sizeof(*mod->kunit_suites), + &mod->num_kunit_suites); +#endif + mod->extable = section_objs(info, "__ex_table", sizeof(*mod->extable), &mod->num_exentries); diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index 8b11552dc215..246645eb3cef 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -613,6 +614,49 @@ void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_test_suites_exit); +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES +static void kunit_module_init(struct module *mod) +{ + unsigned int i; + + for (i = 0; i < mod->num_kunit_suites; i++) + __kunit_test_suites_init(mod->kunit_suites[i]); +} + +static void kunit_module_exit(struct module *mod) +{ + unsigned int i; + + for (i = 0; i < mod->num_kunit_suites; i++) + __kunit_test_suites_exit(mod->kunit_suites[i]); +} + +static int kunit_module_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, + void *data) +{ + struct module *mod = data; + + switch (val) { + case MODULE_STATE_LIVE: + kunit_module_init(mod); + break; + case MODULE_STATE_GOING: + kunit_module_exit(mod); + break; + case MODULE_STATE_COMING: + case MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED: + break; + } + + return 0; +} + +static struct notifier_block kunit_mod_nb = { + .notifier_call = kunit_module_notify, + .priority = 0, +}; +#endif + struct kunit_kmalloc_array_params { size_t n; size_t size; @@ -707,13 +751,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_cleanup); static int __init kunit_init(void) { kunit_debugfs_init(); - +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES + return register_module_notifier(&kunit_mod_nb); +#else return 0; +#endif } late_initcall(kunit_init); static void __exit kunit_exit(void) { +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES + unregister_module_notifier(&kunit_mod_nb); +#endif kunit_debugfs_cleanup(); } module_exit(kunit_exit);