| Message ID | 20221017175819.12672-1-gautammenghani201@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 376bc1b458c9a6db347c70f02fa6eb8b5f187455 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2] selftests/kvm: Avoid for loop initialization using vcpu->id in xapic_state_test | expand |
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xapic_state_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xapic_state_test.c index 6f7a5ef66718..d7d37dae3eeb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xapic_state_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xapic_state_test.c @@ -114,7 +114,9 @@ static void test_icr(struct xapic_vcpu *x) * vCPUs, not vcpu.id + 1. Arbitrarily use vector 0xff. */ icr = APIC_INT_ASSERT | 0xff; - for (i = vcpu->id + 1; i < 0xff; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < 0xff; i++) { + if (i == vcpu->id) + continue; for (j = 0; j < 8; j++) __test_icr(x, i << (32 + 24) | icr | (j << 8)); }
In the test_icr() function in xapic_state_test, one of the for loops is initialized with vcpu->id. Fix this assumption that vcpu->id is 0 so that IPIs are correctly sent to non-existent vCPUs [1]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/YyoZr9rXSSMEtdh5@google.com/ Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Gautam Menghani <gautammenghani201@gmail.com> --- changes in v2: 1. move the lore link above signed off tag tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xapic_state_test.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)