From patchwork Wed Jan 25 03:49:58 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ammar Faizi X-Patchwork-Id: 13114988 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23591C27C76 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 03:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233694AbjAYDub (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2023 22:50:31 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55348 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230410AbjAYDu2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2023 22:50:28 -0500 Received: from gnuweeb.org (gnuweeb.org [51.81.211.47]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C891F4FC20; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 19:50:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [182.253.88.152]) by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60E8882EFF; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 03:50:17 +0000 (UTC) X-GW-Data: lPqxHiMPbJw1wb7CM9QUryAGzr0yq5atzVDdxTR0iA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org; s=default; t=1674618623; bh=24uiwiwmC/lxSl6sPnXU7b81z+lVBJdoQkn4/RYmk6s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=aN4OdJrwSItmrkKFjy0QM33mb8gTgrGcqIrOIk1S1Wd7qdegX41mKOdbQZHgJF0IL k8/8oC54Vf1PLgADpcGFuTILbuPcfAo9MAdz/i6TkpOUmxcdRG0qS37MG7b5iZgL5x x6/433jDrKg+UIA55+GLtgHCWM3fmS5bBUha2LGzSb0Q6YCCRAcwbLltJFBLWAS+1c vP3sLIngu4LWIHUFcERGavR+iWSNlaZ0hRYkzgVpSDoN0cpdbhhXioVouB1rGMpmML M8bEgoE2jGlEI75J1jGikBydd2qiUfqfQVazuCW+0TOCmq5o6RrmfoN32qQYY9YMuP prqPHUF6PENUw== From: Ammar Faizi To: "H. Peter Anvin" , Xin Li Cc: Ammar Faizi , Dave Hansen , Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Cooper , Brian Gerst , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Peter Zijlstra , Shuah Khan , Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , x86 Mailing List , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Linux Kselftest Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: [RFC PATCH v5 2/2] selftests/x86: sysret_rip: Add more syscall tests with respect to `%rcx` and `%r11` Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 10:49:58 +0700 Message-Id: <20230125034958.734527-3-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20230125034958.734527-1-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org> References: <25b96960-a07e-a952-5c23-786b55054126@zytor.com> <6cd0db14-c9e2-3598-fd10-4b473d78c373@citrix.com> <5ecc383c-621b-57d9-7f6d-d63496fca3b3@zytor.com> <20230124022729.596997-1-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org> <20230124022729.596997-3-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org> <20230125034958.734527-1-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org From: Ammar Faizi Test that: - REGS_SAVED: "syscall" in a FRED system doesn't clobber %rcx and %r11. - REGS_SYSRET: "syscall" in a non-FRED system sets %rcx=%rip and %r11=%rflags. Test them out with trivial system calls like __NR_getppid and friends which are extremely likely to return with SYSRET on an IDT system. Goals of this test: - Ensure that the syscall behavior is consistent. It should be either always REGS_SAVED or always REGS_SYSRET. Not a mix of them. - The kernel doesn't leak its internal data when returning to userspace. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/25b96960-a07e-a952-5c23-786b55054126@zytor.com Co-developed-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi --- tools/testing/selftests/x86/sysret_rip.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sysret_rip.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sysret_rip.c index d3dc5ec496854179..7ebfb603bf45fa0a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sysret_rip.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sysret_rip.c @@ -270,8 +270,24 @@ static void test_syscall_fallthrough_to(unsigned long ip) printf("[OK]\tWe survived\n"); } +/* + * Ensure that various system calls are consistent. + * We should not get a mix of REGS_SAVED and REGS_SYSRET. + */ +static void test_syscall_rcx_r11_consistent(void) +{ + do_syscall(__NR_getpid, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0); + do_syscall(__NR_gettid, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0); + do_syscall(__NR_getppid, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0); +} + int main() { + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) + test_syscall_rcx_r11_consistent(); + /* * When the kernel returns from a slow-path syscall, it will * detect whether SYSRET is appropriate. If it incorrectly @@ -279,7 +295,7 @@ int main() * it'll crash on Intel CPUs. */ sethandler(SIGUSR1, sigusr1, 0); - for (int i = 47; i < 64; i++) + for (i = 47; i < 64; i++) test_sigreturn_to(1UL<