Message ID | 20230518083849.2631178-4-davidgow@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Delegated to: | Brendan Higgins |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2,1/4] kunit: Add kunit_add_action() to defer a call until test exit | expand |
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 04:38:46PM +0800, David Gow wrote: > +Registering Cleanup Actions > +--------------------------- > + > +If you need to perform some cleanup beyond simple use of ``kunit_kzalloc``, > +you can register a cusom "deferred action", which is a cleanup function > +run when the test exits (whether cleanly, or via a failed assertion). > + > +Actions are simple functions with no return value, and a single ``void*`` > +context argument, and forfil the same role as "cleanup" functions in Python "... fulfill the same role ..."? > +and Go tests, "defer" statements in languages which support them, and > +(in some cases) destructors in RAII languages. > + > +These are very useful for unregistering things from global lists, closing > +files or other resources, or freeing resources. > + > +For example: > + > +.. code-block:: C > + > + static void cleanup_device(void *ctx) > + { > + struct device *dev = (struct device *)ctx; > + > + device_unregister(dev); > + } > + > + void example_device_test(struct kunit *test) > + { > + struct my_device dev; > + > + device_register(&dev); > + > + kunit_add_action(test, &cleanup_device, &dev); > + } > + > +Note that, for functions like device_unregister which only accept a single > +pointer-sized argument, it's possible to directly cast that function to > +a ``kunit_action_t`` rather than writing a wrapper function, for example: > + > +.. code-block:: C > + > + kunit_add_action(test, (kunit_action_t *)&device_unregister, &dev); > + > +``kunit_add_action`` can fail if, for example, the system is out of memory. > +You can use ``kunit_add_action_or_reset`` instead which runs the action > +immediately if it cannot be deferred. > + > +If you need more control over when the cleanup function is called, you > +can trigger it early using ``kunit_release_action``, or cancel it entirely > +with ``kunit_remove_action``. > + > > Testing Static Functions > ------------------------ The rest is LGTM.
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 4:39 AM David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote: > > Add some basic documentation for kunit_add_action() and related > deferred action functions. Hi David! This looks good to me. Just two typos below. Thanks! Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> > > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> > --- > > This patch is new in v2. > > --- > Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst > index 46957d1cbcbb..c2f0ed648385 100644 > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst > @@ -615,6 +615,57 @@ For example: > KUNIT_ASSERT_STREQ(test, buffer, ""); > } > > +Registering Cleanup Actions > +--------------------------- > + > +If you need to perform some cleanup beyond simple use of ``kunit_kzalloc``, > +you can register a cusom "deferred action", which is a cleanup function Looks like a typo here: "custom" > +run when the test exits (whether cleanly, or via a failed assertion). > + > +Actions are simple functions with no return value, and a single ``void*`` > +context argument, and forfil the same role as "cleanup" functions in Python Another small typo here as Bagas noted. > +and Go tests, "defer" statements in languages which support them, and > +(in some cases) destructors in RAII languages. > + > +These are very useful for unregistering things from global lists, closing > +files or other resources, or freeing resources. > + > +For example: > + > +.. code-block:: C > + > + static void cleanup_device(void *ctx) > + { > + struct device *dev = (struct device *)ctx; > + > + device_unregister(dev); > + } > + > + void example_device_test(struct kunit *test) > + { > + struct my_device dev; > + > + device_register(&dev); > + > + kunit_add_action(test, &cleanup_device, &dev); > + } > + > +Note that, for functions like device_unregister which only accept a single > +pointer-sized argument, it's possible to directly cast that function to > +a ``kunit_action_t`` rather than writing a wrapper function, for example: > + > +.. code-block:: C > + > + kunit_add_action(test, (kunit_action_t *)&device_unregister, &dev); > + > +``kunit_add_action`` can fail if, for example, the system is out of memory. > +You can use ``kunit_add_action_or_reset`` instead which runs the action > +immediately if it cannot be deferred. > + > +If you need more control over when the cleanup function is called, you > +can trigger it early using ``kunit_release_action``, or cancel it entirely > +with ``kunit_remove_action``. > + > > Testing Static Functions > ------------------------ > -- > 2.40.1.698.g37aff9b760-goog >
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst index 46957d1cbcbb..c2f0ed648385 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst @@ -615,6 +615,57 @@ For example: KUNIT_ASSERT_STREQ(test, buffer, ""); } +Registering Cleanup Actions +--------------------------- + +If you need to perform some cleanup beyond simple use of ``kunit_kzalloc``, +you can register a cusom "deferred action", which is a cleanup function +run when the test exits (whether cleanly, or via a failed assertion). + +Actions are simple functions with no return value, and a single ``void*`` +context argument, and forfil the same role as "cleanup" functions in Python +and Go tests, "defer" statements in languages which support them, and +(in some cases) destructors in RAII languages. + +These are very useful for unregistering things from global lists, closing +files or other resources, or freeing resources. + +For example: + +.. code-block:: C + + static void cleanup_device(void *ctx) + { + struct device *dev = (struct device *)ctx; + + device_unregister(dev); + } + + void example_device_test(struct kunit *test) + { + struct my_device dev; + + device_register(&dev); + + kunit_add_action(test, &cleanup_device, &dev); + } + +Note that, for functions like device_unregister which only accept a single +pointer-sized argument, it's possible to directly cast that function to +a ``kunit_action_t`` rather than writing a wrapper function, for example: + +.. code-block:: C + + kunit_add_action(test, (kunit_action_t *)&device_unregister, &dev); + +``kunit_add_action`` can fail if, for example, the system is out of memory. +You can use ``kunit_add_action_or_reset`` instead which runs the action +immediately if it cannot be deferred. + +If you need more control over when the cleanup function is called, you +can trigger it early using ``kunit_release_action``, or cancel it entirely +with ``kunit_remove_action``. + Testing Static Functions ------------------------
Add some basic documentation for kunit_add_action() and related deferred action functions. Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> --- This patch is new in v2. --- Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)