Message ID | 20230803193635.1047337-1-rmoar@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 1c9fd080dffe5e5ad763527fbc2aa3f6f8c653e9 |
Delegated to: | Brendan Higgins |
Headers | show |
Series | [-next,v2] kunit: fix uninitialized variables bug in attributes filtering | expand |
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 03:37, Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> wrote: > > Fix smatch warnings regarding uninitialized variables in the filtering > patch of the new KUnit Attributes feature. > > Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes") > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202307270610.s0w4NKEn-lkp@intel.com/ > > Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> > --- > > Change since v1: > - Changed initialization of filtered to be {NULL, NULL} at the start and > only updated when ready to return. > - Remove unnecessary +1 in memory allocation for parsed_filters in > executor test. > > Note that this is rebased on top of the recent fix: > ("kunit: fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites()"). Thanks: this looks good to me now! Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Cheers, -- David > > lib/kunit/attributes.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++---------------------- > lib/kunit/executor.c | 18 +++++++++++------- > lib/kunit/executor_test.c | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/kunit/attributes.c b/lib/kunit/attributes.c > index d37c40c0ce4f..5e3034b6be99 100644 > --- a/lib/kunit/attributes.c > +++ b/lib/kunit/attributes.c > @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int int_filter(long val, const char *op, int input, int *err) > static int attr_enum_filter(void *attr, const char *input, int *err, > const char * const str_list[], int max) > { > - int i, j, input_int; > + int i, j, input_int = -1; > long test_val = (long)attr; > const char *input_val = NULL; > > @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static int attr_enum_filter(void *attr, const char *input, int *err, > input_int = j; > } > > - if (!input_int) { > + if (input_int < 0) { > *err = -EINVAL; > pr_err("kunit executor: invalid filter input: %s\n", input); > return false; > @@ -186,8 +186,10 @@ static void *attr_module_get(void *test_or_suite, bool is_test) > // Suites get their module attribute from their first test_case > if (test) > return ((void *) test->module_name); > - else > + else if (kunit_suite_num_test_cases(suite) > 0) > return ((void *) suite->test_cases[0].module_name); > + else > + return (void *) ""; > } > > /* List of all Test Attributes */ > @@ -221,7 +223,7 @@ const char *kunit_attr_filter_name(struct kunit_attr_filter filter) > void kunit_print_attr(void *test_or_suite, bool is_test, unsigned int test_level) > { > int i; > - bool to_free; > + bool to_free = false; > void *attr; > const char *attr_name, *attr_str; > struct kunit_suite *suite = is_test ? NULL : test_or_suite; > @@ -255,7 +257,7 @@ void kunit_print_attr(void *test_or_suite, bool is_test, unsigned int test_level > > int kunit_get_filter_count(char *input) > { > - int i, comma_index, count = 0; > + int i, comma_index = 0, count = 0; > > for (i = 0; input[i]; i++) { > if (input[i] == ',') { > @@ -272,7 +274,7 @@ int kunit_get_filter_count(char *input) > struct kunit_attr_filter kunit_next_attr_filter(char **filters, int *err) > { > struct kunit_attr_filter filter = {}; > - int i, j, comma_index, new_start_index; > + int i, j, comma_index = 0, new_start_index = 0; > int op_index = -1, attr_index = -1; > char op; > char *input = *filters; > @@ -316,7 +318,7 @@ struct kunit_attr_filter kunit_next_attr_filter(char **filters, int *err) > filter.attr = &kunit_attr_list[attr_index]; > } > > - if (comma_index) { > + if (comma_index > 0) { > input[comma_index] = '\0'; > filter.input = input + op_index; > input = input + new_start_index; > @@ -356,31 +358,22 @@ struct kunit_suite *kunit_filter_attr_tests(const struct kunit_suite *const suit > > /* Save filtering result on default value */ > default_result = filter.attr->filter(filter.attr->attr_default, filter.input, err); > - if (*err) { > - kfree(copy); > - kfree(filtered); > - return NULL; > - } > + if (*err) > + goto err; > > /* Save suite attribute value and filtering result on that value */ > suite_val = filter.attr->get_attr((void *)suite, false); > suite_result = filter.attr->filter(suite_val, filter.input, err); > - if (*err) { > - kfree(copy); > - kfree(filtered); > - return NULL; > - } > + if (*err) > + goto err; > > /* For each test case, save test case if passes filtering. */ > kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) { > test_val = filter.attr->get_attr((void *) test_case, true); > test_result = filter.attr->filter(filter.attr->get_attr(test_case, true), > filter.input, err); > - if (*err) { > - kfree(copy); > - kfree(filtered); > - return NULL; > - } > + if (*err) > + goto err; > > /* > * If attribute value of test case is set, filter on that value. > @@ -406,7 +399,8 @@ struct kunit_suite *kunit_filter_attr_tests(const struct kunit_suite *const suit > } > } > > - if (n == 0) { > +err: > + if (n == 0 || *err) { > kfree(copy); > kfree(filtered); > return NULL; > diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c > index 481901d245d0..dc295150c4e5 100644 > --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c > +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c > @@ -127,19 +127,18 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set, > { > int i, j, k; > int filter_count = 0; > - struct kunit_suite **copy, *filtered_suite, *new_filtered_suite; > - struct suite_set filtered; > + struct kunit_suite **copy, **copy_start, *filtered_suite, *new_filtered_suite; > + struct suite_set filtered = {NULL, NULL}; > struct kunit_glob_filter parsed_glob; > - struct kunit_attr_filter *parsed_filters; > + struct kunit_attr_filter *parsed_filters = NULL; > > const size_t max = suite_set->end - suite_set->start; > > copy = kmalloc_array(max, sizeof(*filtered.start), GFP_KERNEL); > - filtered.start = copy; > if (!copy) { /* won't be able to run anything, return an empty set */ > - filtered.end = copy; > return filtered; > } > + copy_start = copy; > > if (filter_glob) > kunit_parse_glob_filter(&parsed_glob, filter_glob); > @@ -147,7 +146,11 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set, > /* Parse attribute filters */ > if (filters) { > filter_count = kunit_get_filter_count(filters); > - parsed_filters = kcalloc(filter_count + 1, sizeof(*parsed_filters), GFP_KERNEL); > + parsed_filters = kcalloc(filter_count, sizeof(*parsed_filters), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!parsed_filters) { > + kfree(copy); > + return filtered; > + } > for (j = 0; j < filter_count; j++) > parsed_filters[j] = kunit_next_attr_filter(&filters, err); > if (*err) > @@ -166,7 +169,7 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set, > goto err; > } > } > - if (filter_count) { > + if (filter_count > 0 && parsed_filters != NULL) { > for (k = 0; k < filter_count; k++) { > new_filtered_suite = kunit_filter_attr_tests(filtered_suite, > parsed_filters[k], filter_action, err); > @@ -195,6 +198,7 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set, > > *copy++ = filtered_suite; > } > + filtered.start = copy_start; > filtered.end = copy; > > err: > diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor_test.c b/lib/kunit/executor_test.c > index 01280cb8d451..3e0a1c99cb4e 100644 > --- a/lib/kunit/executor_test.c > +++ b/lib/kunit/executor_test.c > @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static void parse_filter_attr_test(struct kunit *test) > filter_count = kunit_get_filter_count(filters); > KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, filter_count, 2); > > - parsed_filters = kunit_kcalloc(test, filter_count + 1, sizeof(*parsed_filters), > + parsed_filters = kunit_kcalloc(test, filter_count, sizeof(*parsed_filters), > GFP_KERNEL); > for (j = 0; j < filter_count; j++) { > parsed_filters[j] = kunit_next_attr_filter(&filters, &err); > > base-commit: 3bffe185ad11e408903d2782727877388d08d94e > -- > 2.41.0.585.gd2178a4bd4-goog >
diff --git a/lib/kunit/attributes.c b/lib/kunit/attributes.c index d37c40c0ce4f..5e3034b6be99 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/attributes.c +++ b/lib/kunit/attributes.c @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int int_filter(long val, const char *op, int input, int *err) static int attr_enum_filter(void *attr, const char *input, int *err, const char * const str_list[], int max) { - int i, j, input_int; + int i, j, input_int = -1; long test_val = (long)attr; const char *input_val = NULL; @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static int attr_enum_filter(void *attr, const char *input, int *err, input_int = j; } - if (!input_int) { + if (input_int < 0) { *err = -EINVAL; pr_err("kunit executor: invalid filter input: %s\n", input); return false; @@ -186,8 +186,10 @@ static void *attr_module_get(void *test_or_suite, bool is_test) // Suites get their module attribute from their first test_case if (test) return ((void *) test->module_name); - else + else if (kunit_suite_num_test_cases(suite) > 0) return ((void *) suite->test_cases[0].module_name); + else + return (void *) ""; } /* List of all Test Attributes */ @@ -221,7 +223,7 @@ const char *kunit_attr_filter_name(struct kunit_attr_filter filter) void kunit_print_attr(void *test_or_suite, bool is_test, unsigned int test_level) { int i; - bool to_free; + bool to_free = false; void *attr; const char *attr_name, *attr_str; struct kunit_suite *suite = is_test ? NULL : test_or_suite; @@ -255,7 +257,7 @@ void kunit_print_attr(void *test_or_suite, bool is_test, unsigned int test_level int kunit_get_filter_count(char *input) { - int i, comma_index, count = 0; + int i, comma_index = 0, count = 0; for (i = 0; input[i]; i++) { if (input[i] == ',') { @@ -272,7 +274,7 @@ int kunit_get_filter_count(char *input) struct kunit_attr_filter kunit_next_attr_filter(char **filters, int *err) { struct kunit_attr_filter filter = {}; - int i, j, comma_index, new_start_index; + int i, j, comma_index = 0, new_start_index = 0; int op_index = -1, attr_index = -1; char op; char *input = *filters; @@ -316,7 +318,7 @@ struct kunit_attr_filter kunit_next_attr_filter(char **filters, int *err) filter.attr = &kunit_attr_list[attr_index]; } - if (comma_index) { + if (comma_index > 0) { input[comma_index] = '\0'; filter.input = input + op_index; input = input + new_start_index; @@ -356,31 +358,22 @@ struct kunit_suite *kunit_filter_attr_tests(const struct kunit_suite *const suit /* Save filtering result on default value */ default_result = filter.attr->filter(filter.attr->attr_default, filter.input, err); - if (*err) { - kfree(copy); - kfree(filtered); - return NULL; - } + if (*err) + goto err; /* Save suite attribute value and filtering result on that value */ suite_val = filter.attr->get_attr((void *)suite, false); suite_result = filter.attr->filter(suite_val, filter.input, err); - if (*err) { - kfree(copy); - kfree(filtered); - return NULL; - } + if (*err) + goto err; /* For each test case, save test case if passes filtering. */ kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) { test_val = filter.attr->get_attr((void *) test_case, true); test_result = filter.attr->filter(filter.attr->get_attr(test_case, true), filter.input, err); - if (*err) { - kfree(copy); - kfree(filtered); - return NULL; - } + if (*err) + goto err; /* * If attribute value of test case is set, filter on that value. @@ -406,7 +399,8 @@ struct kunit_suite *kunit_filter_attr_tests(const struct kunit_suite *const suit } } - if (n == 0) { +err: + if (n == 0 || *err) { kfree(copy); kfree(filtered); return NULL; diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index 481901d245d0..dc295150c4e5 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -127,19 +127,18 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set, { int i, j, k; int filter_count = 0; - struct kunit_suite **copy, *filtered_suite, *new_filtered_suite; - struct suite_set filtered; + struct kunit_suite **copy, **copy_start, *filtered_suite, *new_filtered_suite; + struct suite_set filtered = {NULL, NULL}; struct kunit_glob_filter parsed_glob; - struct kunit_attr_filter *parsed_filters; + struct kunit_attr_filter *parsed_filters = NULL; const size_t max = suite_set->end - suite_set->start; copy = kmalloc_array(max, sizeof(*filtered.start), GFP_KERNEL); - filtered.start = copy; if (!copy) { /* won't be able to run anything, return an empty set */ - filtered.end = copy; return filtered; } + copy_start = copy; if (filter_glob) kunit_parse_glob_filter(&parsed_glob, filter_glob); @@ -147,7 +146,11 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set, /* Parse attribute filters */ if (filters) { filter_count = kunit_get_filter_count(filters); - parsed_filters = kcalloc(filter_count + 1, sizeof(*parsed_filters), GFP_KERNEL); + parsed_filters = kcalloc(filter_count, sizeof(*parsed_filters), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!parsed_filters) { + kfree(copy); + return filtered; + } for (j = 0; j < filter_count; j++) parsed_filters[j] = kunit_next_attr_filter(&filters, err); if (*err) @@ -166,7 +169,7 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set, goto err; } } - if (filter_count) { + if (filter_count > 0 && parsed_filters != NULL) { for (k = 0; k < filter_count; k++) { new_filtered_suite = kunit_filter_attr_tests(filtered_suite, parsed_filters[k], filter_action, err); @@ -195,6 +198,7 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set, *copy++ = filtered_suite; } + filtered.start = copy_start; filtered.end = copy; err: diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor_test.c b/lib/kunit/executor_test.c index 01280cb8d451..3e0a1c99cb4e 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor_test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor_test.c @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static void parse_filter_attr_test(struct kunit *test) filter_count = kunit_get_filter_count(filters); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, filter_count, 2); - parsed_filters = kunit_kcalloc(test, filter_count + 1, sizeof(*parsed_filters), + parsed_filters = kunit_kcalloc(test, filter_count, sizeof(*parsed_filters), GFP_KERNEL); for (j = 0; j < filter_count; j++) { parsed_filters[j] = kunit_next_attr_filter(&filters, &err);
Fix smatch warnings regarding uninitialized variables in the filtering patch of the new KUnit Attributes feature. Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202307270610.s0w4NKEn-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> --- Change since v1: - Changed initialization of filtered to be {NULL, NULL} at the start and only updated when ready to return. - Remove unnecessary +1 in memory allocation for parsed_filters in executor test. Note that this is rebased on top of the recent fix: ("kunit: fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites()"). lib/kunit/attributes.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++---------------------- lib/kunit/executor.c | 18 +++++++++++------- lib/kunit/executor_test.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) base-commit: 3bffe185ad11e408903d2782727877388d08d94e