| Message ID | 20230922071020.2554677-3-ruanjinjie@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | e44679515a7b803cf0143dc9de3d2ecbe907f939 |
| Delegated to: | Brendan Higgins |
| Headers | show |
| Series | kunit: Fix some bugs in kunit | expand |
On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 15:11, 'Jinjie Ruan' via KUnit Development <kunit-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > If the outer layer for loop is iterated more than once and it fails not > in the first iteration, the copy pointer has been moved. So it should free > the original copy's backup copy_start. > > Fixes: abbf73816b6f ("kunit: fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites()") > Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> > Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> > --- > v2: > - Add Reviewed-by. > --- Like v2, this looks good. Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Cheers, -- David > lib/kunit/executor.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c > index a037a46fae5e..9358ed2df839 100644 > --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c > +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c > @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ kunit_filter_suites(const struct kunit_suite_set *suite_set, > > free_copy: > if (*err) > - kfree(copy); > + kfree(copy_start); > > return filtered; > } > -- > 2.34.1 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "KUnit Development" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kunit-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kunit-dev/20230922071020.2554677-3-ruanjinjie%40huawei.com.
diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index a037a46fae5e..9358ed2df839 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ kunit_filter_suites(const struct kunit_suite_set *suite_set, free_copy: if (*err) - kfree(copy); + kfree(copy_start); return filtered; }
If the outer layer for loop is iterated more than once and it fails not in the first iteration, the copy pointer has been moved. So it should free the original copy's backup copy_start. Fixes: abbf73816b6f ("kunit: fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites()") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> --- v2: - Add Reviewed-by. --- lib/kunit/executor.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)