| Message ID | 20231009024932.2563622-6-li.meng@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | amd-pstate preferred core | expand |
Hi Meng Li, On 09 Oct 10:49, Meng Li wrote: > Preferred core rankings can be changed dynamically by the > platform based on the workload and platform conditions and > accounting for thermals and aging. > When this occurs, cpu priority need to be set. > > Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> > Reviewed-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com> > Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> > Signed-off-by: Meng Li <li.meng@amd.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > include/linux/amd-pstate.h | 6 ++++++ > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c > index 6ac8939fce5a..d3369247c6c9 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c > @@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ static int pstate_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata) > WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_perf, AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF(cap1)); > WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf, AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF(cap1)); > WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_perf, AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF(cap1)); > + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking, AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF(cap1)); > > return 0; > } > @@ -334,6 +335,7 @@ static int cppc_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata) > WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf, > cppc_perf.lowest_nonlinear_perf); > WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_perf, cppc_perf.lowest_perf); > + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking, cppc_perf.highest_perf); > > if (cppc_state == AMD_PSTATE_ACTIVE) > return 0; > @@ -540,7 +542,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_adjust_perf(unsigned int cpu, > if (target_perf < capacity) > des_perf = DIV_ROUND_UP(cap_perf * target_perf, capacity); > > - min_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf); > + min_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_perf); This seems to be a fix. So, this could be a separate patch. > if (_min_perf < capacity) > min_perf = DIV_ROUND_UP(cap_perf * _min_perf, capacity); > > @@ -760,6 +762,32 @@ static void amd_pstate_init_prefcore(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata) > } > } > > +static void amd_pstate_update_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu) > +{ > + struct cpufreq_policy *policy; > + struct amd_cpudata *cpudata; > + u32 prev_high = 0, cur_high = 0; > + int ret; > + > + if ((!amd_pstate_prefcore) || (!cpudata->hw_prefcore)) > + return; > + > + ret = amd_pstate_get_highest_perf(cpu, &cur_high); > + if (ret) > + return; > + > + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); > + cpudata = policy->driver_data; > + prev_high = READ_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking); > + > + if (prev_high != cur_high) { > + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking, cur_high); > + sched_set_itmt_core_prio(cur_high, cpu); > + } > + > + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); > +} > + > static int amd_pstate_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > { > int min_freq, max_freq, nominal_freq, lowest_nonlinear_freq, ret; > @@ -926,7 +954,7 @@ static ssize_t show_amd_pstate_highest_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > u32 perf; > struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = policy->driver_data; > > - perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf); > + perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking); I think this should show cpudata->highest_perf. Thanks, Wyes > > return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", perf); > } > @@ -1502,6 +1530,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver amd_pstate_driver = { > .suspend = amd_pstate_cpu_suspend, > .resume = amd_pstate_cpu_resume, > .set_boost = amd_pstate_set_boost, > + .update_highest_perf = amd_pstate_update_highest_perf, > .name = "amd-pstate", > .attr = amd_pstate_attr, > }; > @@ -1516,6 +1545,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver amd_pstate_epp_driver = { > .online = amd_pstate_epp_cpu_online, > .suspend = amd_pstate_epp_suspend, > .resume = amd_pstate_epp_resume, > + .update_highest_perf = amd_pstate_update_highest_perf, > .name = "amd-pstate-epp", > .attr = amd_pstate_epp_attr, > }; > diff --git a/include/linux/amd-pstate.h b/include/linux/amd-pstate.h > index 87e140e9e6db..426822612373 100644 > --- a/include/linux/amd-pstate.h > +++ b/include/linux/amd-pstate.h > @@ -39,11 +39,16 @@ struct amd_aperf_mperf { > * @cppc_req_cached: cached performance request hints > * @highest_perf: the maximum performance an individual processor may reach, > * assuming ideal conditions > + * For platforms that do not support the preferred core feature, the > + * highest_pef may be configured with 166 or 255, to avoid max frequency > + * calculated wrongly. we take the fixed value as the highest_perf. > * @nominal_perf: the maximum sustained performance level of the processor, > * assuming ideal operating conditions > * @lowest_nonlinear_perf: the lowest performance level at which nonlinear power > * savings are achieved > * @lowest_perf: the absolute lowest performance level of the processor > + * @prefcore_ranking: the preferred core ranking, the higher value indicates a higher > + * priority. > * @max_freq: the frequency that mapped to highest_perf > * @min_freq: the frequency that mapped to lowest_perf > * @nominal_freq: the frequency that mapped to nominal_perf > @@ -73,6 +78,7 @@ struct amd_cpudata { > u32 nominal_perf; > u32 lowest_nonlinear_perf; > u32 lowest_perf; > + u32 prefcore_ranking; > > u32 max_freq; > u32 min_freq; > -- > 2.34.1 >
[AMD Official Use Only - General] Hi Wyes: > -----Original Message----- > From: Karny, Wyes <Wyes.Karny@amd.com> > Sent: Monday, October 9, 2023 2:19 PM > To: Meng, Li (Jassmine) <Li.Meng@amd.com> > Cc: Karny, Wyes <Wyes.Karny@amd.com>; Rafael J . Wysocki > <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>; Huang, Ray <Ray.Huang@amd.com>; linux- > pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; x86@kernel.org; linux- > acpi@vger.kernel.org; Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>; linux- > kselftest@vger.kernel.org; Fontenot, Nathan > <Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com>; Sharma, Deepak > <Deepak.Sharma@amd.com>; Deucher, Alexander > <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Limonciello, Mario > <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>; Huang, Shimmer > <Shimmer.Huang@amd.com>; Yuan, Perry <Perry.Yuan@amd.com>; Du, > Xiaojian <Xiaojian.Du@amd.com>; Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>; > Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 5/7] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Update amd-pstate > preferred core ranking dynamically > > Hi Meng Li, > > On 09 Oct 10:49, Meng Li wrote: > > Preferred core rankings can be changed dynamically by the platform > > based on the workload and platform conditions and accounting for > > thermals and aging. > > When this occurs, cpu priority need to be set. > > > > Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> > > Reviewed-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com> > > Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> > > Signed-off-by: Meng Li <li.meng@amd.com> > > --- > > drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 34 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > include/linux/amd-pstate.h | 6 ++++++ > > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c > > b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c index 6ac8939fce5a..d3369247c6c9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c > > @@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ static int pstate_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata > *cpudata) > > WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_perf, > AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF(cap1)); > > WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf, > AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF(cap1)); > > WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_perf, > AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF(cap1)); > > + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking, > AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF(cap1)); > > > > return 0; > > } > > @@ -334,6 +335,7 @@ static int cppc_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata > *cpudata) > > WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf, > > cppc_perf.lowest_nonlinear_perf); > > WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_perf, cppc_perf.lowest_perf); > > + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking, cppc_perf.highest_perf); > > > > if (cppc_state == AMD_PSTATE_ACTIVE) > > return 0; > > @@ -540,7 +542,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_adjust_perf(unsigned int > cpu, > > if (target_perf < capacity) > > des_perf = DIV_ROUND_UP(cap_perf * target_perf, > capacity); > > > > - min_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf); > > + min_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_perf); > > This seems to be a fix. So, this could be a separate patch. [Meng, Li (Jassmine)] Thanks, I will modify it. > > > if (_min_perf < capacity) > > min_perf = DIV_ROUND_UP(cap_perf * _min_perf, capacity); > > > > @@ -760,6 +762,32 @@ static void amd_pstate_init_prefcore(struct > amd_cpudata *cpudata) > > } > > } > > > > +static void amd_pstate_update_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu) { > > + struct cpufreq_policy *policy; > > + struct amd_cpudata *cpudata; > > + u32 prev_high = 0, cur_high = 0; > > + int ret; > > + > > + if ((!amd_pstate_prefcore) || (!cpudata->hw_prefcore)) > > + return; > > + > > + ret = amd_pstate_get_highest_perf(cpu, &cur_high); > > + if (ret) > > + return; > > + > > + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); > > + cpudata = policy->driver_data; > > + prev_high = READ_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking); > > + > > + if (prev_high != cur_high) { > > + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking, cur_high); > > + sched_set_itmt_core_prio(cur_high, cpu); > > + } > > + > > + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); > > +} > > + > > static int amd_pstate_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { > > int min_freq, max_freq, nominal_freq, lowest_nonlinear_freq, ret; > @@ > > -926,7 +954,7 @@ static ssize_t show_amd_pstate_highest_perf(struct > cpufreq_policy *policy, > > u32 perf; > > struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = policy->driver_data; > > > > - perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf); > > + perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking); > > I think this should show cpudata->highest_perf. [Meng, Li (Jassmine)] Thanks, I will modify it. Add a new function for prefcore_ranking. > > Thanks, > Wyes > > > > return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", perf); } @@ -1502,6 +1530,7 @@ > > static struct cpufreq_driver amd_pstate_driver = { > > .suspend = amd_pstate_cpu_suspend, > > .resume = amd_pstate_cpu_resume, > > .set_boost = amd_pstate_set_boost, > > + .update_highest_perf = amd_pstate_update_highest_perf, > > .name = "amd-pstate", > > .attr = amd_pstate_attr, > > }; > > @@ -1516,6 +1545,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver > amd_pstate_epp_driver = { > > .online = amd_pstate_epp_cpu_online, > > .suspend = amd_pstate_epp_suspend, > > .resume = amd_pstate_epp_resume, > > + .update_highest_perf = amd_pstate_update_highest_perf, > > .name = "amd-pstate-epp", > > .attr = amd_pstate_epp_attr, > > }; > > diff --git a/include/linux/amd-pstate.h b/include/linux/amd-pstate.h > > index 87e140e9e6db..426822612373 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/amd-pstate.h > > +++ b/include/linux/amd-pstate.h > > @@ -39,11 +39,16 @@ struct amd_aperf_mperf { > > * @cppc_req_cached: cached performance request hints > > * @highest_perf: the maximum performance an individual processor may > reach, > > * assuming ideal conditions > > + * For platforms that do not support the preferred core > feature, the > > + * highest_pef may be configured with 166 or 255, to avoid > max frequency > > + * calculated wrongly. we take the fixed value as the > highest_perf. > > * @nominal_perf: the maximum sustained performance level of the > processor, > > * assuming ideal operating conditions > > * @lowest_nonlinear_perf: the lowest performance level at which > nonlinear power > > * savings are achieved > > * @lowest_perf: the absolute lowest performance level of the > > processor > > + * @prefcore_ranking: the preferred core ranking, the higher value > indicates a higher > > + * priority. > > * @max_freq: the frequency that mapped to highest_perf > > * @min_freq: the frequency that mapped to lowest_perf > > * @nominal_freq: the frequency that mapped to nominal_perf @@ -73,6 > > +78,7 @@ struct amd_cpudata { > > u32 nominal_perf; > > u32 lowest_nonlinear_perf; > > u32 lowest_perf; > > + u32 prefcore_ranking; > > > > u32 max_freq; > > u32 min_freq; > > -- > > 2.34.1 > >
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c index 6ac8939fce5a..d3369247c6c9 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c @@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ static int pstate_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata) WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_perf, AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF(cap1)); WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf, AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF(cap1)); WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_perf, AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF(cap1)); + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking, AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF(cap1)); return 0; } @@ -334,6 +335,7 @@ static int cppc_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata) WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf, cppc_perf.lowest_nonlinear_perf); WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_perf, cppc_perf.lowest_perf); + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking, cppc_perf.highest_perf); if (cppc_state == AMD_PSTATE_ACTIVE) return 0; @@ -540,7 +542,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_adjust_perf(unsigned int cpu, if (target_perf < capacity) des_perf = DIV_ROUND_UP(cap_perf * target_perf, capacity); - min_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf); + min_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_perf); if (_min_perf < capacity) min_perf = DIV_ROUND_UP(cap_perf * _min_perf, capacity); @@ -760,6 +762,32 @@ static void amd_pstate_init_prefcore(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata) } } +static void amd_pstate_update_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu) +{ + struct cpufreq_policy *policy; + struct amd_cpudata *cpudata; + u32 prev_high = 0, cur_high = 0; + int ret; + + if ((!amd_pstate_prefcore) || (!cpudata->hw_prefcore)) + return; + + ret = amd_pstate_get_highest_perf(cpu, &cur_high); + if (ret) + return; + + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); + cpudata = policy->driver_data; + prev_high = READ_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking); + + if (prev_high != cur_high) { + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking, cur_high); + sched_set_itmt_core_prio(cur_high, cpu); + } + + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); +} + static int amd_pstate_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { int min_freq, max_freq, nominal_freq, lowest_nonlinear_freq, ret; @@ -926,7 +954,7 @@ static ssize_t show_amd_pstate_highest_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, u32 perf; struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = policy->driver_data; - perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf); + perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking); return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", perf); } @@ -1502,6 +1530,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver amd_pstate_driver = { .suspend = amd_pstate_cpu_suspend, .resume = amd_pstate_cpu_resume, .set_boost = amd_pstate_set_boost, + .update_highest_perf = amd_pstate_update_highest_perf, .name = "amd-pstate", .attr = amd_pstate_attr, }; @@ -1516,6 +1545,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver amd_pstate_epp_driver = { .online = amd_pstate_epp_cpu_online, .suspend = amd_pstate_epp_suspend, .resume = amd_pstate_epp_resume, + .update_highest_perf = amd_pstate_update_highest_perf, .name = "amd-pstate-epp", .attr = amd_pstate_epp_attr, }; diff --git a/include/linux/amd-pstate.h b/include/linux/amd-pstate.h index 87e140e9e6db..426822612373 100644 --- a/include/linux/amd-pstate.h +++ b/include/linux/amd-pstate.h @@ -39,11 +39,16 @@ struct amd_aperf_mperf { * @cppc_req_cached: cached performance request hints * @highest_perf: the maximum performance an individual processor may reach, * assuming ideal conditions + * For platforms that do not support the preferred core feature, the + * highest_pef may be configured with 166 or 255, to avoid max frequency + * calculated wrongly. we take the fixed value as the highest_perf. * @nominal_perf: the maximum sustained performance level of the processor, * assuming ideal operating conditions * @lowest_nonlinear_perf: the lowest performance level at which nonlinear power * savings are achieved * @lowest_perf: the absolute lowest performance level of the processor + * @prefcore_ranking: the preferred core ranking, the higher value indicates a higher + * priority. * @max_freq: the frequency that mapped to highest_perf * @min_freq: the frequency that mapped to lowest_perf * @nominal_freq: the frequency that mapped to nominal_perf @@ -73,6 +78,7 @@ struct amd_cpudata { u32 nominal_perf; u32 lowest_nonlinear_perf; u32 lowest_perf; + u32 prefcore_ranking; u32 max_freq; u32 min_freq;