diff mbox series

[RFC,2/3] selftests/nolibc: migrate startup tests to new harness

Message ID 20231115-nolibc-harness-v1-2-4d61382d9bf3@weissschuh.net (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series selftests/nolibc: introduce new test harness | expand

Commit Message

Thomas Weißschuh Nov. 15, 2023, 9:08 p.m. UTC
Migrate part of nolibc-test.c to the new test harness.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 106 ++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

Comments

Willy Tarreau Nov. 16, 2023, 7:33 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:08:20PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Migrate part of nolibc-test.c to the new test harness.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>

A few points, mostly questions and food for thoughts.

> -static void putcharn(char c, size_t n)
> -{
> -	char buf[64];
> -
> -	memset(buf, c, n);
> -	buf[n] = '\0';
> -	fputs(buf, stdout);
> -}
> -

Ah now I see how the other one came from :-)  My comment about the size
check still stands anyway, especially when placed in an include file.

> +#if defined(NOLIBC)
> +
> +#define ASSUME_NOLIBC(stmt)
> +
> +#else /* defined(NOLIBC) */
> +
> +/* differ from nolibc, both glibc and musl have no global _auxv */
> +unsigned long *_auxv = (void *)-1;
> +#define ASSUME_NOLIBC(stmt) SKIP(stmt)
> +
> +#endif /* defined(NOLIBC) */
> +

I've seen below how it's used and don't find this very clear. In general,
passing a statement as an argument to a macro, especially control statements
such as "return" is a bit difficult to grasp. If the macro is only used for
this, maybe it should integrate the return statement and be called something
like "RETURN_UNLESS_NOLIBC()" which is quite explicit this time. If you really
need to keep the statement adjustable, then most likely that calling the
macro "UNLESS_NOLIBC()" would help, because I understand more naturally
that the following will perform a return if we're not on nolibc:

    UNLESS_NOLIBC(return);

than:

    ASSUME_NOLIBC(return);

> -	for (test = min; test >= 0 && test <= max; test++) {
> -		int llen = 0; /* line length */
> +	if (brk)
> +		return brk;
>  
> -		/* avoid leaving empty lines below, this will insert holes into
> -		 * test numbers.
> -		 */
> -		switch (test + __LINE__ + 1) {
> -		CASE_TEST(argc);             EXPECT_GE(1, test_argc, 1); break;
> -		CASE_TEST(argv_addr);        EXPECT_PTRGT(1, test_argv, brk); break;
> -		CASE_TEST(argv_environ);     EXPECT_PTRLT(1, test_argv, environ); break;
> -		CASE_TEST(argv_total);       EXPECT_EQ(1, environ - test_argv - 1, test_argc ?: 1); break;
> -		CASE_TEST(argv0_addr);       EXPECT_PTRGT(1, argv0, brk); break;
> -		CASE_TEST(argv0_str);        EXPECT_STRNZ(1, argv0 > brk ? argv0 : NULL); break;
> -		CASE_TEST(argv0_len);        EXPECT_GE(1,  argv0 > brk ? strlen(argv0) : 0, 1); break;
> -		CASE_TEST(environ_addr);     EXPECT_PTRGT(1, environ, brk); break;
> -		CASE_TEST(environ_envp);     EXPECT_PTREQ(1, environ, test_envp); break;
> -		CASE_TEST(environ_auxv);     EXPECT_PTRLT(test_auxv != (void *)-1, environ, test_auxv); break;
> -		CASE_TEST(environ_total);    EXPECT_GE(test_auxv != (void *)-1, (void *)test_auxv - (void *)environ - 1, env_total); break;
> -		CASE_TEST(environ_HOME);     EXPECT_PTRNZ(1, getenv("HOME")); break;
> -		CASE_TEST(auxv_addr);        EXPECT_PTRGT(test_auxv != (void *)-1, test_auxv, brk); break;
> -		CASE_TEST(auxv_AT_UID);      EXPECT_EQ(1, getauxval(AT_UID), getuid()); break;
> -		CASE_TEST(constructor);      EXPECT_EQ(1, constructor_test_value, 2); break;
> -		CASE_TEST(linkage_errno);    EXPECT_PTREQ(1, linkage_test_errno_addr(), &errno); break;
> -		CASE_TEST(linkage_constr);   EXPECT_EQ(1, linkage_test_constructor_test_value, 6); break;
> -		case __LINE__:
> -			return ret; /* must be last */
> -		/* note: do not set any defaults so as to permit holes above */
> -		}
> -	}
> -	return ret;
> +	brk = sbrk(0);
> +
> +	if (brk == (void *)-1)
> +		brk = &end;
> +
> +	return brk;
>  }
>  
> +TEST(startup, argc)           { ASSERT_GE(test_argc, 1); }
> +TEST(startup, argv_addr)      { ASSERT_GT((void *)test_argv, pbrk()); }
> +TEST(startup, argv_environ)   { ASSERT_LT(test_argv, environ); }
> +TEST(startup, argv_total)     { ASSERT_EQ(environ - test_argv - 1, test_argc ?: 1); }
> +TEST(startup, argv0_addr)     { ASSERT_GT((void *)argv0, pbrk()); }
> +TEST(startup, argv0_str)      { ASSERT_STRNZ((void *)argv0 > pbrk() ? argv0 : NULL); }
> +TEST(startup, argv0_len)      { ASSERT_GE((void *)argv0 > pbrk() ? strlen(argv0) : 0U, 1U); }
> +TEST(startup, environ_addr)   { ASSERT_GT((void *)environ, pbrk()); }
> +TEST(startup, environ_envp)   { ASSERT_EQ(environ, test_envp); }
> +TEST(startup, environ_auxv)   {
> +	ASSUME_NOLIBC(return);
> +	ASSERT_LT((void *)environ, (void *)_auxv);
> +}
> +TEST(startup, environ_total)  {
> +	ASSUME_NOLIBC(return);
> +	/* kernel at least passes HOME and TERM, shell passes more */
> +	ASSERT_GE((void *)_auxv - (void *)environ - 1, 2);
> +}
> +TEST(startup, environ_HOME)   { ASSERT_NE(getenv("HOME"), NULL); }
> +TEST(startup, auxv_addr)      {
> +	ASSUME_NOLIBC(return);
> +	ASSERT_GT((void *)_auxv, pbrk());
> +}
> +TEST(startup, auxv_AT_UID)    { ASSERT_EQ(getauxval(AT_UID), getuid()); }
> +TEST(startup, constructor)    { ASSERT_EQ(constructor_test_value, 2); }
> +TEST(startup, linkage_errno)  { ASSERT_EQ(linkage_test_errno_addr(), &errno); }
> +TEST(startup, linkage_constr) { ASSERT_EQ(linkage_test_constructor_test_value, 6); }

I do appreciate the much lower indent level that still manages to
enumerate tests easily. But given that test suites are grouped, shouldn't
we go a bit further and state that TEST() operates on the suite defined
by the TEST_SUITE macro that must be defined before it ? This way you would
have:

  #define TEST_SUITE startup
  TEST(argc)           { ASSERT_GE(test_argc, 1); }
  TEST(argv_addr)      { ASSERT_GT((void *)test_argv, pbrk()); }
  ...
  #undef TEST_SUITE

One thing that was not immediately obvious to me upon first read was
if TEST() defines or executes a test (i.e. "test" is both a noun and a
verb). Of course, spending 10 more seconds on the patch makes it obvious
it's a definition, but maybe following the same logic we have with
run_test_suite(), we should place the verb in front, for example
"DEF_TEST()" which then makes it quite unambiguous. Any opinion ?

Willy
Thomas Weißschuh Nov. 16, 2023, 2:46 p.m. UTC | #2
On 2023-11-16 08:33:27+0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:08:20PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > Migrate part of nolibc-test.c to the new test harness.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
> 
> A few points, mostly questions and food for thoughts.
> 
> > -static void putcharn(char c, size_t n)
> > -{
> > -	char buf[64];
> > -
> > -	memset(buf, c, n);
> > -	buf[n] = '\0';
> > -	fputs(buf, stdout);
> > -}
> > -
> 
> Ah now I see how the other one came from :-)  My comment about the size
> check still stands anyway, especially when placed in an include file.
> 
> > +#if defined(NOLIBC)
> > +
> > +#define ASSUME_NOLIBC(stmt)
> > +
> > +#else /* defined(NOLIBC) */
> > +
> > +/* differ from nolibc, both glibc and musl have no global _auxv */
> > +unsigned long *_auxv = (void *)-1;
> > +#define ASSUME_NOLIBC(stmt) SKIP(stmt)
> > +
> > +#endif /* defined(NOLIBC) */
> > +
> 
> I've seen below how it's used and don't find this very clear. In general,
> passing a statement as an argument to a macro, especially control statements
> such as "return" is a bit difficult to grasp. If the macro is only used for
> this, maybe it should integrate the return statement and be called something
> like "RETURN_UNLESS_NOLIBC()" which is quite explicit this time. If you really
> need to keep the statement adjustable, then most likely that calling the
> macro "UNLESS_NOLIBC()" would help, because I understand more naturally
> that the following will perform a return if we're not on nolibc:
> 
>     UNLESS_NOLIBC(return);
> 
> than:
> 
>     ASSUME_NOLIBC(return);

The statement arguments is modelled after SKIP() from
kselftest_harness.h.

But the wrapper you proposed is indeed much better,
I'll switch to that.

> 
> > -	for (test = min; test >= 0 && test <= max; test++) {
> > -		int llen = 0; /* line length */
> > +	if (brk)
> > +		return brk;
> >  
> > -		/* avoid leaving empty lines below, this will insert holes into
> > -		 * test numbers.
> > -		 */
> > -		switch (test + __LINE__ + 1) {
> > -		CASE_TEST(argc);             EXPECT_GE(1, test_argc, 1); break;
> > -		CASE_TEST(argv_addr);        EXPECT_PTRGT(1, test_argv, brk); break;
> > -		CASE_TEST(argv_environ);     EXPECT_PTRLT(1, test_argv, environ); break;
> > -		CASE_TEST(argv_total);       EXPECT_EQ(1, environ - test_argv - 1, test_argc ?: 1); break;
> > -		CASE_TEST(argv0_addr);       EXPECT_PTRGT(1, argv0, brk); break;
> > -		CASE_TEST(argv0_str);        EXPECT_STRNZ(1, argv0 > brk ? argv0 : NULL); break;
> > -		CASE_TEST(argv0_len);        EXPECT_GE(1,  argv0 > brk ? strlen(argv0) : 0, 1); break;
> > -		CASE_TEST(environ_addr);     EXPECT_PTRGT(1, environ, brk); break;
> > -		CASE_TEST(environ_envp);     EXPECT_PTREQ(1, environ, test_envp); break;
> > -		CASE_TEST(environ_auxv);     EXPECT_PTRLT(test_auxv != (void *)-1, environ, test_auxv); break;
> > -		CASE_TEST(environ_total);    EXPECT_GE(test_auxv != (void *)-1, (void *)test_auxv - (void *)environ - 1, env_total); break;
> > -		CASE_TEST(environ_HOME);     EXPECT_PTRNZ(1, getenv("HOME")); break;
> > -		CASE_TEST(auxv_addr);        EXPECT_PTRGT(test_auxv != (void *)-1, test_auxv, brk); break;
> > -		CASE_TEST(auxv_AT_UID);      EXPECT_EQ(1, getauxval(AT_UID), getuid()); break;
> > -		CASE_TEST(constructor);      EXPECT_EQ(1, constructor_test_value, 2); break;
> > -		CASE_TEST(linkage_errno);    EXPECT_PTREQ(1, linkage_test_errno_addr(), &errno); break;
> > -		CASE_TEST(linkage_constr);   EXPECT_EQ(1, linkage_test_constructor_test_value, 6); break;
> > -		case __LINE__:
> > -			return ret; /* must be last */
> > -		/* note: do not set any defaults so as to permit holes above */
> > -		}
> > -	}
> > -	return ret;
> > +	brk = sbrk(0);
> > +
> > +	if (brk == (void *)-1)
> > +		brk = &end;
> > +
> > +	return brk;
> >  }
> >  
> > +TEST(startup, argc)           { ASSERT_GE(test_argc, 1); }
> > +TEST(startup, argv_addr)      { ASSERT_GT((void *)test_argv, pbrk()); }
> > +TEST(startup, argv_environ)   { ASSERT_LT(test_argv, environ); }
> > +TEST(startup, argv_total)     { ASSERT_EQ(environ - test_argv - 1, test_argc ?: 1); }
> > +TEST(startup, argv0_addr)     { ASSERT_GT((void *)argv0, pbrk()); }
> > +TEST(startup, argv0_str)      { ASSERT_STRNZ((void *)argv0 > pbrk() ? argv0 : NULL); }
> > +TEST(startup, argv0_len)      { ASSERT_GE((void *)argv0 > pbrk() ? strlen(argv0) : 0U, 1U); }
> > +TEST(startup, environ_addr)   { ASSERT_GT((void *)environ, pbrk()); }
> > +TEST(startup, environ_envp)   { ASSERT_EQ(environ, test_envp); }
> > +TEST(startup, environ_auxv)   {
> > +	ASSUME_NOLIBC(return);
> > +	ASSERT_LT((void *)environ, (void *)_auxv);
> > +}
> > +TEST(startup, environ_total)  {
> > +	ASSUME_NOLIBC(return);
> > +	/* kernel at least passes HOME and TERM, shell passes more */
> > +	ASSERT_GE((void *)_auxv - (void *)environ - 1, 2);
> > +}
> > +TEST(startup, environ_HOME)   { ASSERT_NE(getenv("HOME"), NULL); }
> > +TEST(startup, auxv_addr)      {
> > +	ASSUME_NOLIBC(return);
> > +	ASSERT_GT((void *)_auxv, pbrk());
> > +}
> > +TEST(startup, auxv_AT_UID)    { ASSERT_EQ(getauxval(AT_UID), getuid()); }
> > +TEST(startup, constructor)    { ASSERT_EQ(constructor_test_value, 2); }
> > +TEST(startup, linkage_errno)  { ASSERT_EQ(linkage_test_errno_addr(), &errno); }
> > +TEST(startup, linkage_constr) { ASSERT_EQ(linkage_test_constructor_test_value, 6); }
> 
> I do appreciate the much lower indent level that still manages to
> enumerate tests easily. But given that test suites are grouped, shouldn't
> we go a bit further and state that TEST() operates on the suite defined
> by the TEST_SUITE macro that must be defined before it ? This way you would
> have:
> 
>   #define TEST_SUITE startup
>   TEST(argc)           { ASSERT_GE(test_argc, 1); }
>   TEST(argv_addr)      { ASSERT_GT((void *)test_argv, pbrk()); }
>   ...
>   #undef TEST_SUITE
> 
> One thing that was not immediately obvious to me upon first read was
> if TEST() defines or executes a test (i.e. "test" is both a noun and a
> verb). Of course, spending 10 more seconds on the patch makes it obvious
> it's a definition, but maybe following the same logic we have with
> run_test_suite(), we should place the verb in front, for example
> "DEF_TEST()" which then makes it quite unambiguous. Any opinion ?

The TEST() macro is modelled after kselftest_harness
(which only takes one argument, as it doesn't support suites)
and google test which works the same as the new TEST().

So I would prefer to keep the name.

As for specifying the suite via a macro:
I like that it saves even more indentation but at the same time it feels
a bit too implicit.

I'm not sure...
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
index e173014f6b66..6c1b42b58e3e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ 
 #endif
 
 #include "nolibc-test-linkage.h"
+#include "nolibc-harness.h"
 
 /* for the type of int_fast16_t and int_fast32_t, musl differs from glibc and nolibc */
 #define SINT_MAX_OF_TYPE(type) (((type)1 << (sizeof(type) * 8 - 2)) - (type)1 + ((type)1 << (sizeof(type) * 8 - 2)))
@@ -130,15 +131,6 @@  static const char *errorname(int err)
 	}
 }
 
-static void putcharn(char c, size_t n)
-{
-	char buf[64];
-
-	memset(buf, c, n);
-	buf[n] = '\0';
-	fputs(buf, stdout);
-}
-
 enum RESULT {
 	OK,
 	FAIL,
@@ -599,6 +591,19 @@  int expect_strne(const char *expr, int llen, const char *cmp)
 #define CASE_TEST(name) \
 	case __LINE__: llen += printf("%d %s", test, #name);
 
+#if defined(NOLIBC)
+
+#define ASSUME_NOLIBC(stmt)
+
+#else /* defined(NOLIBC) */
+
+/* differ from nolibc, both glibc and musl have no global _auxv */
+unsigned long *_auxv = (void *)-1;
+#define ASSUME_NOLIBC(stmt) SKIP(stmt)
+
+#endif /* defined(NOLIBC) */
+
+
 /* constructors validate that they are executed in definition order */
 __attribute__((constructor))
 static void constructor1(void)
@@ -612,53 +617,54 @@  static void constructor2(void)
 	constructor_test_value *= 2;
 }
 
-int run_startup(int min, int max)
+static const void *pbrk(void)
 {
-	int test;
-	int ret = 0;
-	/* kernel at least passes HOME and TERM, shell passes more */
-	int env_total = 2;
-	/* checking NULL for argv/argv0, environ and _auxv is not enough, let's compare with sbrk(0) or &end */
 	extern char end;
-	char *brk = sbrk(0) != (void *)-1 ? sbrk(0) : &end;
-	/* differ from nolibc, both glibc and musl have no global _auxv */
-	const unsigned long *test_auxv = (void *)-1;
-#ifdef NOLIBC
-	test_auxv = _auxv;
-#endif
+	static char *brk;
 
-	for (test = min; test >= 0 && test <= max; test++) {
-		int llen = 0; /* line length */
+	if (brk)
+		return brk;
 
-		/* avoid leaving empty lines below, this will insert holes into
-		 * test numbers.
-		 */
-		switch (test + __LINE__ + 1) {
-		CASE_TEST(argc);             EXPECT_GE(1, test_argc, 1); break;
-		CASE_TEST(argv_addr);        EXPECT_PTRGT(1, test_argv, brk); break;
-		CASE_TEST(argv_environ);     EXPECT_PTRLT(1, test_argv, environ); break;
-		CASE_TEST(argv_total);       EXPECT_EQ(1, environ - test_argv - 1, test_argc ?: 1); break;
-		CASE_TEST(argv0_addr);       EXPECT_PTRGT(1, argv0, brk); break;
-		CASE_TEST(argv0_str);        EXPECT_STRNZ(1, argv0 > brk ? argv0 : NULL); break;
-		CASE_TEST(argv0_len);        EXPECT_GE(1,  argv0 > brk ? strlen(argv0) : 0, 1); break;
-		CASE_TEST(environ_addr);     EXPECT_PTRGT(1, environ, brk); break;
-		CASE_TEST(environ_envp);     EXPECT_PTREQ(1, environ, test_envp); break;
-		CASE_TEST(environ_auxv);     EXPECT_PTRLT(test_auxv != (void *)-1, environ, test_auxv); break;
-		CASE_TEST(environ_total);    EXPECT_GE(test_auxv != (void *)-1, (void *)test_auxv - (void *)environ - 1, env_total); break;
-		CASE_TEST(environ_HOME);     EXPECT_PTRNZ(1, getenv("HOME")); break;
-		CASE_TEST(auxv_addr);        EXPECT_PTRGT(test_auxv != (void *)-1, test_auxv, brk); break;
-		CASE_TEST(auxv_AT_UID);      EXPECT_EQ(1, getauxval(AT_UID), getuid()); break;
-		CASE_TEST(constructor);      EXPECT_EQ(1, constructor_test_value, 2); break;
-		CASE_TEST(linkage_errno);    EXPECT_PTREQ(1, linkage_test_errno_addr(), &errno); break;
-		CASE_TEST(linkage_constr);   EXPECT_EQ(1, linkage_test_constructor_test_value, 6); break;
-		case __LINE__:
-			return ret; /* must be last */
-		/* note: do not set any defaults so as to permit holes above */
-		}
-	}
-	return ret;
+	brk = sbrk(0);
+
+	if (brk == (void *)-1)
+		brk = &end;
+
+	return brk;
 }
 
+TEST(startup, argc)           { ASSERT_GE(test_argc, 1); }
+TEST(startup, argv_addr)      { ASSERT_GT((void *)test_argv, pbrk()); }
+TEST(startup, argv_environ)   { ASSERT_LT(test_argv, environ); }
+TEST(startup, argv_total)     { ASSERT_EQ(environ - test_argv - 1, test_argc ?: 1); }
+TEST(startup, argv0_addr)     { ASSERT_GT((void *)argv0, pbrk()); }
+TEST(startup, argv0_str)      { ASSERT_STRNZ((void *)argv0 > pbrk() ? argv0 : NULL); }
+TEST(startup, argv0_len)      { ASSERT_GE((void *)argv0 > pbrk() ? strlen(argv0) : 0U, 1U); }
+TEST(startup, environ_addr)   { ASSERT_GT((void *)environ, pbrk()); }
+TEST(startup, environ_envp)   { ASSERT_EQ(environ, test_envp); }
+TEST(startup, environ_auxv)   {
+	ASSUME_NOLIBC(return);
+	ASSERT_LT((void *)environ, (void *)_auxv);
+}
+TEST(startup, environ_total)  {
+	ASSUME_NOLIBC(return);
+	/* kernel at least passes HOME and TERM, shell passes more */
+	ASSERT_GE((void *)_auxv - (void *)environ - 1, 2);
+}
+TEST(startup, environ_HOME)   { ASSERT_NE(getenv("HOME"), NULL); }
+TEST(startup, auxv_addr)      {
+	ASSUME_NOLIBC(return);
+	ASSERT_GT((void *)_auxv, pbrk());
+}
+TEST(startup, auxv_AT_UID)    { ASSERT_EQ(getauxval(AT_UID), getuid()); }
+TEST(startup, constructor)    { ASSERT_EQ(constructor_test_value, 2); }
+TEST(startup, linkage_errno)  { ASSERT_EQ(linkage_test_errno_addr(), &errno); }
+TEST(startup, linkage_constr) { ASSERT_EQ(linkage_test_constructor_test_value, 6); }
+
+int run_startup(int min, int max)
+{
+	return run_test_suite("startup", min, max);
+}
 
 /* used by some syscall tests below */
 int test_getdents64(const char *dir)