From patchwork Mon Jan 22 15:28:50 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jeff Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 13525651 Received: from mail-pf1-f173.google.com (mail-pf1-f173.google.com [209.85.210.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 773415DF07 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:29:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.173 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705937355; cv=none; b=tencbpTIq+/2jGrwTt3FR0iIDOC9HFK/UMUuUayGu9ypuoT+SMYd7no4ckKjjgP8dcMDeiILiVmY6PDaZ6AkeD5qF/lxNxkCtCSuoEvq+AR3IHmsTsWQn/Eehre3iSLN6430bP4LIlkurOZonrO81HwfJnEMgNVzTBkGjAzFPBs= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705937355; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qFLLEzEQY9RrJb+O54+DXQZdLE3RHpmttMYetOYEUZ4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=n3VYZqWpl6XfWxUJQJJZaXkDftl97e5an3X7gJ5WV3/OVCA5koq4eDjzV0N91lMoboQZcJkLKZSPm2Su69KRhOkH7MejUXGL2PzIuffns3jl6kvEsVzr2t0gWPPCss2AOes2dLjDCo8uPpoAroPM9PI2F6VgyXj5StdXTsHBgJg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b=I/kNe/D9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="I/kNe/D9" Received: by mail-pf1-f173.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6dbe5014eb5so512285b3a.0 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 07:29:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1705937352; x=1706542152; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=mkL2/JBu7Xm4fXV2SaZyo6nhyEe635LV1RL9ITVGXBc=; b=I/kNe/D9MkTdUjPg95g2RJjJxGKrk38WWob/MLhT9HactWp1N6DRCpWSQZY7s/sxiT 4akMR6KVIkUYpYKWX2L+7+tzQk20qchOPq/ccNuRnUgatAtOQdBF+xgjK8zr7pEppJBI htrwu1RxnqIm+Ou4g0ZKkh331SjXSSDpoqZfA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705937352; x=1706542152; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mkL2/JBu7Xm4fXV2SaZyo6nhyEe635LV1RL9ITVGXBc=; b=V9dYqsvZuXFq3BUloFS44qUVvBFCB1GIsmtc9YxFrE+T2HuemFrwCrgFwGER6QA9xW O/hGLECJhong0vFk7/r5LATF3QlU3Z5O82Xf65gUz/pF2GVIfmM0sUXhJTxi9zbsHKk3 rZPgYIqnhdNkf2jcnKmNeLLW+xW1Kof/WrYPZ6zrnZ77QCDlBb5laKS8k57aE85ndOf8 uOiMYCK6SdW5pM8qi4/IaCVs3r1FGxyI8C9CQYrM+IZjD5gIE7Yn8oZhHEkEgZqh3aDS ZGTParbgmH1hc+F+CQD1QjG4VbG6PRM1R7EoW+h80QstCQQQubyMFqA8vknot4kUrjMI a/gg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwNOOwugm3DyRIFFqiLQkHf7YL4HBrT6JwdLfDckiURIOkPsXWF gyOTEIf9lBYIEUM+d27iHUZVbdg84eLgMSb//14UDGi28S1i0uCjJTfQTRs5CQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEojaweEqOqB9iixvGtj85QUL1W2QLrCxvGYzSIRt4xieXc2D9OQdVdixqSGP+kissYVTN+GQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d489:b0:1d6:fbab:d409 with SMTP id c9-20020a170902d48900b001d6fbabd409mr2261821plg.58.1705937351561; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 07:29:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (34.85.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.85.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id h30-20020a056a00001e00b006d9ac70682bsm9638639pfk.167.2024.01.22.07.29.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Jan 2024 07:29:11 -0800 (PST) From: jeffxu@chromium.org To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org, jannh@google.com, sroettger@google.com, willy@infradead.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, usama.anjum@collabora.com, rdunlap@infradead.org Cc: jeffxu@google.com, jorgelo@chromium.org, groeck@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, pedro.falcato@gmail.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, deraadt@openbsd.org, Jeff Xu Subject: [PATCH v7 4/4] mseal:add documentation Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:28:50 +0000 Message-ID: <20240122152905.2220849-5-jeffxu@chromium.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0.429.g432eaa2c6b-goog In-Reply-To: <20240122152905.2220849-1-jeffxu@chromium.org> References: <20240122152905.2220849-1-jeffxu@chromium.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Jeff Xu Add documentation for mseal(). Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu --- Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/userspace-api/mseal.rst | 183 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 184 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/userspace-api/mseal.rst diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst index 09f61bd2ac2e..178f6a1d79cb 100644 --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ place where this information is gathered. iommu iommufd media/index + mseal netlink/index sysfs-platform_profile vduse diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/mseal.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/mseal.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..929a706b70eb --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/mseal.rst @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +===================== +Introduction of mseal +===================== + +:Author: Jeff Xu + +Modern CPUs support memory permissions such as RW and NX bits. The memory +permission feature improves security stance on memory corruption bugs, i.e. +the attacker can’t just write to arbitrary memory and point the code to it, +the memory has to be marked with X bit, or else an exception will happen. + +Memory sealing additionally protects the mapping itself against +modifications. This is useful to mitigate memory corruption issues where a +corrupted pointer is passed to a memory management system. For example, +such an attacker primitive can break control-flow integrity guarantees +since read-only memory that is supposed to be trusted can become writable +or .text pages can get remapped. Memory sealing can automatically be +applied by the runtime loader to seal .text and .rodata pages and +applications can additionally seal security critical data at runtime. + +A similar feature already exists in the XNU kernel with the +VM_FLAGS_PERMANENT flag [1] and on OpenBSD with the mimmutable syscall [2]. + +User API +======== +Two system calls are involved in virtual memory sealing, mseal() and mmap(). + +mseal() +----------- +The mseal() syscall has the following signature: + +``int mseal(void addr, size_t len, unsigned long flags)`` + +**addr/len**: virtual memory address range. + +The address range set by ``addr``/``len`` must meet: + - The start address must be in an allocated VMA. + - The start address must be page aligned. + - The end address (``addr`` + ``len``) must be in an allocated VMA. + - no gap (unallocated memory) between start and end address. + +The ``len`` will be paged aligned implicitly by the kernel. + +**flags**: reserved for future use. + +**return values**: + +- ``0``: Success. + +- ``-EINVAL``: + - Invalid input ``flags``. + - The start address (``addr``) is not page aligned. + - Address range (``addr`` + ``len``) overflow. + +- ``-ENOMEM``: + - The start address (``addr``) is not allocated. + - The end address (``addr`` + ``len``) is not allocated. + - A gap (unallocated memory) between start and end address. + +- ``-EACCES``: + - ``MAP_SEALABLE`` is not set during mmap(). + +- ``-EPERM``: + - sealing is supported only on 64-bit CPUs, 32-bit is not supported. + +- For above error cases, users can expect the given memory range is + unmodified, i.e. no partial update. + +- There might be other internal errors/cases not listed here, e.g. + error during merging/splitting VMAs, or the process reaching the max + number of supported VMAs. In those cases, partial updates to the given + memory range could happen. However, those cases should be rare. + +**Blocked operations after sealing**: + Unmapping, moving to another location, and shrinking the size, + via munmap() and mremap(), can leave an empty space, therefore + can be replaced with a VMA with a new set of attributes. + + Moving or expanding a different VMA into the current location, + via mremap(). + + Modifying a VMA via mmap(MAP_FIXED). + + Size expansion, via mremap(), does not appear to pose any + specific risks to sealed VMAs. It is included anyway because + the use case is unclear. In any case, users can rely on + merging to expand a sealed VMA. + + mprotect() and pkey_mprotect(). + + Some destructive madvice() behaviors (e.g. MADV_DONTNEED) + for anonymous memory, when users don't have write permission to the + memory. Those behaviors can alter region contents by discarding pages, + effectively a memset(0) for anonymous memory. + + Kernel will return -EPERM for blocked operations. + +**Note**: + +- mseal() only works on 64-bit CPUs, not 32-bit CPU. + +- users can call mseal() multiple times, mseal() on an already sealed memory + is a no-action (not error). + +- munseal() is not supported. + +mmap() +---------- +``void *mmap(void* addr, size_t length, int prot, int flags, int fd, +off_t offset);`` + +We add two changes in ``prot`` and ``flags`` of mmap() related to +memory sealing. + +**prot** + +The ``PROT_SEAL`` bit in ``prot`` field of mmap(). + +When present, it marks the memory is sealed since creation. + +This is useful as optimization because it avoids having to make two +system calls: one for mmap() and one for mseal(). + +It's worth noting that even though the sealing is set via the +``prot`` field in mmap(), it can't be set in the ``prot`` +field in later mprotect(). This is unlike the ``PROT_READ``, +``PROT_WRITE``, ``PROT_EXEC`` bits, e.g. if ``PROT_WRITE`` is not set in +mprotect(), it means that the region is not writable. + +Setting ``PROT_SEAL`` implies setting ``MAP_SEALABLE`` below. + +**flags** + +The ``MAP_SEALABLE`` bit in the ``flags`` field of mmap(). + +When present, it marks the map as sealable. A map created +without ``MAP_SEALABLE`` will not support sealing. In other words, +mseal() will fail for such a map. + + +Applications that don't care about sealing will expect their +behavior unchanged. For those that need sealing support, opt in +by adding ``MAP_SEALABLE`` in mmap(). + +Note: for a map created without ``MAP_SEALABLE`` or a map created +with ``MAP_SEALABLE`` but not sealed yet, mmap(MAP_FIXED) can +change the sealable or sealing bit. + +Use Case: +========= +- glibc: + The dynamic linker, during loading ELF executables, can apply sealing to + non-writable memory segments. + +- Chrome browser: protect some security sensitive data-structures. + +Additional notes: +================= +As Jann Horn pointed out in [3], there are still a few ways to write +to RO memory, which is, in a way, by design. Those cases are not covered +by mseal(). If applications want to block such cases, sandbox tools (such as +seccomp, LSM, etc) might be considered. + +Those cases are: + +- Write to read-only memory through /proc/self/mem interface. +- Write to read-only memory through ptrace (such as PTRACE_POKETEXT). +- userfaultfd. + +The idea that inspired this patch comes from Stephen Röttger’s work in V8 +CFI [4]. Chrome browser in ChromeOS will be the first user of this API. + +Reference: +========== +[1] https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/xnu/blob/1031c584a5e37aff177559b9f69dbd3c8c3fd30a/osfmk/mach/vm_statistics.h#L274 + +[2] https://man.openbsd.org/mimmutable.2 + +[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAG48ez3ShUYey+ZAFsU2i1RpQn0a5eOs2hzQ426FkcgnfUGLvA@mail.gmail.com + +[4] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O2jwK4dxI3nRcOJuPYkonhTkNQfbmwdvxQMyXgeaRHo/edit#heading=h.bvaojj9fu6hc