From patchwork Fri Mar 29 04:44:49 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Deepak Gupta X-Patchwork-Id: 13610036 Received: from mail-pg1-f181.google.com (mail-pg1-f181.google.com [209.85.215.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8D8B4DA12 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 04:46:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.181 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711687603; cv=none; b=L/xTOqofMq9GioPu2QaV+z/bRFW9ZuuEDuleUl8tJOri5EtIHJ/iEelJjF6/noUfYbmH3wlO7KWlDglJREDkkbAutMM0UizP1ttULzLyj5RbuON9FQ26X/rZvDSpXENQ1F5BdZNWXKBPgGgzc3yrO3P3ZtuC95HdQlO+88YBfO8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711687603; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TJWvotzJ48nYEjqewEUgq3/Dp9/Cc8HYLOAlWpuc8p8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=RZULAC/kP8NFHZNxCMdj1oC2PfbQ69mOe4a5PIeWKzjWtPQDnQPmLrd4T0Nh70ExP1DEE+FcU4MfNUmPrxLEJlHq79l34UbqEnJcE66Kk8PrUzvcuyJZKmBrvT0nmACBfO9PhEdgLS3gh2DgukQ9t3bkZF3nDp/PMhMBnJ51+cE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=aF9ufGd8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.181 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="aF9ufGd8" Received: by mail-pg1-f181.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5dcc4076c13so1153065a12.0 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 21:46:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1711687600; x=1712292400; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=OSTo4BG6xg4Q2onv+lGORpCI7MnnKplqFj/mRoj65CU=; b=aF9ufGd8RXY07mqYhRLa2BubqC8EiR4Lz+NwYAORJGNPFb2uZneX7o/PnS9KbwRVul Hyk9cZN7roreKouloc3sCU/RjC/mb6QglDaosmwlqpUxl2KurPBUxB97TG1KxVmalQDK cISv9AycucXq3UIZrltOby0mXe4DyWiixElD7f1YOVqLie5lv6GbKJ3BiTcTViIHKkvs 7WMNevkRo7XqyB+5fGI/eWLB1eZnHz/3Y6gFBpLsk/yDBxY6Lc63BempZPQh22La7e/+ /Ici3+uja3lNnoqnn1PUJd7BmrVeHUH2T+AGOFbnkfJ+MDxG0ZhzmamHOLUsomHHLhon RSvw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711687600; x=1712292400; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OSTo4BG6xg4Q2onv+lGORpCI7MnnKplqFj/mRoj65CU=; b=Dxfv39m5ZLk4EFhE3yl+pPo8hX51+Ii523lJo5KeXA9AAHWrGkXykbvHGlg1SLiJeG TsuhZKMazyjoFKTLGf7lTJonadB0+FB5jtCrr+AHhEJGvqgB87uTJZbiOl1QGxhZRsx8 PXgA42SzcdTPYk/72mhMx58pYIyPKRt9KRHFsIxayqHOQJ+b5dTcoQUVX63DN8SZs5Ey jKHiSgeNP8tSYoI7bQ7fELY0AKsuuOk4jViYhtgnq+pAeoNPeSLqmGWuZaQI5w/3Moc4 v/ISLpl84aREE7zzYlJ9kJdvo/NYW/G4q2Kh5MIZkfi8JPpbO4Gx2NzwKXcy3pHQEKKk Fi7Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVlFM/1V++Ky7o2NHNbOr+hapVTfTSwu6/aZRKrDlgaA7kpNScDKIC+QaLs1WU1/Lqon37cEYN48P1gx1TbwAtJ//k56TW+1R6CKx96uoPz X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzhZUw7o5b94dJts7bncq97wgMFVfWiUMUgFEKFaXe3B2hMjE4O eK3m+n1xNH6+7VlNNF7XEmjdE9kkzeKK+bVdd6WionOf9dnCNjrWt2+OEXM+b4w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGy01J0/WrcquoydjAoH+JlQeZkJBLUoT7UPHOF1/Tfs8zhjBY9fqykQxytj7scXuJBpM8nqw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:5489:b0:1a5:6d3a:65ed with SMTP id i9-20020a056a20548900b001a56d3a65edmr2080319pzk.3.1711687600379; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 21:46:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debug.ba.rivosinc.com ([64.71.180.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i18-20020aa78b52000000b006ea7e972947sm2217120pfd.130.2024.03.28.21.46.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 28 Mar 2024 21:46:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Deepak Gupta To: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, broonie@kernel.org, Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com, keescook@chromium.org, ajones@ventanamicro.com, conor.dooley@microchip.com, cleger@rivosinc.com, atishp@atishpatra.org, alex@ghiti.fr, bjorn@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com, samuel.holland@sifive.com, palmer@sifive.com, conor@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: corbet@lwn.net, tech-j-ext@lists.risc-v.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, oleg@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, ebiederm@xmission.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, lstoakes@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, debug@rivosinc.com, andy.chiu@sifive.com, jerry.shih@sifive.com, hankuan.chen@sifive.com, greentime.hu@sifive.com, evan@rivosinc.com, xiao.w.wang@intel.com, charlie@rivosinc.com, apatel@ventanamicro.com, mchitale@ventanamicro.com, dbarboza@ventanamicro.com, sameo@rivosinc.com, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, willy@infradead.org, vincent.chen@sifive.com, guoren@kernel.org, samitolvanen@google.com, songshuaishuai@tinylab.org, gerg@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de, bhe@redhat.com, jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com, cyy@cyyself.name, maskray@google.com, ancientmodern4@gmail.com, mathis.salmen@matsal.de, cuiyunhui@bytedance.com, bgray@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, baruch@tkos.co.il, alx@kernel.org, david@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, revest@chromium.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, shr@devkernel.io, deller@gmx.de, omosnace@redhat.com, ojeda@kernel.org, jhubbard@nvidia.com Subject: [PATCH v2 17/27] riscv: Implements arch agnostic shadow stack prctls Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 21:44:49 -0700 Message-Id: <20240329044459.3990638-18-debug@rivosinc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240329044459.3990638-1-debug@rivosinc.com> References: <20240329044459.3990638-1-debug@rivosinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Implement architecture agnostic prctls() interface for setting and getting shadow stack status. prctls implemented are PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS and PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS. As part of PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS/PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, only PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE is implemented because RISCV allows each mode to write to their own shadow stack using `sspush` or `ssamoswap`. PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS locks current configuration of shadow stack enabling. Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta --- arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h | 18 +++++- arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 8 +++ arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h index b47574a7a8c9..a168ae0fa5d8 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ #include +#include struct task_struct; struct kernel_clone_args; @@ -14,7 +15,8 @@ struct kernel_clone_args; #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI struct cfi_status { unsigned long ubcfi_en : 1; /* Enable for backward cfi. */ - unsigned long rsvd : ((sizeof(unsigned long)*8) - 1); + unsigned long ubcfi_locked : 1; + unsigned long rsvd : ((sizeof(unsigned long)*8) - 2); unsigned long user_shdw_stk; /* Current user shadow stack pointer */ unsigned long shdw_stk_base; /* Base address of shadow stack */ unsigned long shdw_stk_size; /* size of shadow stack */ @@ -26,6 +28,10 @@ void shstk_release(struct task_struct *tsk); void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, unsigned long size); void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr); bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task); +bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task); +void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable); + +#define PR_SHADOW_STACK_SUPPORTED_STATUS_MASK (PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE) #else @@ -56,6 +62,16 @@ static inline bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task) return false; } +static inline bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return false; +} + +static inline void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable) +{ + +} + #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI */ #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c index 9551017d16db..d6dfef22c274 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c @@ -145,6 +145,14 @@ void start_thread(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long pc, regs->epc = pc; regs->sp = sp; + /* + * clear shadow stack state on exec. + * libc will set it later via prctl. + */ + set_shstk_status(current, false); + set_shstk_base(current, 0, 0); + set_active_shstk(current, 0); + #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT regs->status &= ~SR_UXL; diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c index 11ef7ab925c9..cdedf1f78b3e 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c @@ -24,6 +24,16 @@ bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task) return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_en ? true : false; } +bool is_shstk_allocated(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_base ? true : false; +} + +bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_locked ? true : false; +} + void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, unsigned long size) { task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_base = shstk_addr; @@ -42,6 +52,23 @@ void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr) task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.user_shdw_stk = shstk_addr; } +void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable) +{ + task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_en = enable ? 1 : 0; + + if (enable) + task->thread_info.envcfg |= ENVCFG_SSE; + else + task->thread_info.envcfg &= ~ENVCFG_SSE; + + csr_write(CSR_ENVCFG, task->thread_info.envcfg); +} + +void set_shstk_lock(struct task_struct *task) +{ + task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_locked = 1; +} + /* * If size is 0, then to be compatible with regular stack we want it to be as big as * regular stack. Else PAGE_ALIGN it and return back @@ -268,3 +295,83 @@ void shstk_release(struct task_struct *tsk) vm_munmap(base, size); set_shstk_base(tsk, 0, 0); } + +int arch_get_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long __user *status) +{ + unsigned long bcfi_status = 0; + + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack()) + return -EINVAL; + + /* this means shadow stack is enabled on the task */ + bcfi_status |= (is_shstk_enabled(t) ? PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE : 0); + + return copy_to_user(status, &bcfi_status, sizeof(bcfi_status)) ? -EFAULT : 0; +} + +int arch_set_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status) +{ + unsigned long size = 0, addr = 0; + bool enable_shstk = false; + + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack()) + return -EINVAL; + + /* Reject unknown flags */ + if (status & ~PR_SHADOW_STACK_SUPPORTED_STATUS_MASK) + return -EINVAL; + + /* bcfi status is locked and further can't be modified by user */ + if (is_shstk_locked(t)) + return -EINVAL; + + enable_shstk = status & PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE; + /* Request is to enable shadow stack and shadow stack is not enabled already */ + if (enable_shstk && !is_shstk_enabled(t)) { + /* shadow stack was allocated and enable request again + * no need to support such usecase and return EINVAL. + */ + if (is_shstk_allocated(t)) + return -EINVAL; + + size = calc_shstk_size(0); + addr = allocate_shadow_stack(0, size, 0, false); + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr)) + return -ENOMEM; + set_shstk_base(t, addr, size); + set_active_shstk(t, addr + size); + } + + /* + * If a request to disable shadow stack happens, let's go ahead and release it + * Although, if CLONE_VFORKed child did this, then in that case we will end up + * not releasing the shadow stack (because it might be needed in parent). Although + * we will disable it for VFORKed child. And if VFORKed child tries to enable again + * then in that case, it'll get entirely new shadow stack because following condition + * are true + * - shadow stack was not enabled for vforked child + * - shadow stack base was anyways pointing to 0 + * This shouldn't be a big issue because we want parent to have availability of shadow + * stack whenever VFORKed child releases resources via exit or exec but at the same + * time we want VFORKed child to break away and establish new shadow stack if it desires + * + */ + if (!enable_shstk) + shstk_release(t); + + set_shstk_status(t, enable_shstk); + return 0; +} + +int arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *task, + unsigned long arg) +{ + /* If shtstk not supported or not enabled on task, nothing to lock here */ + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack() || + !is_shstk_enabled(task)) + return -EINVAL; + + set_shstk_lock(task); + + return 0; +}