Message ID | 20240424-nolibc-musl-brk-v1-1-b49882dd9a93@weissschuh.net (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 6cada28465f692a730051c9586a324926c034152 |
Headers | show |
Series | selftests/nolibc: disable brk()/sbrk() tests on musl | expand |
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 12:15:33AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > On musl calls to brk() and sbrk() always fail with ENOMEM. > Detect this and skip the tests on musl. > > Tested on glibc 2.39 and musl 1.2.5 in addition to nolibc. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 10 +++++++--- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c > index 94bb6e11c16f..89be9ba95179 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c > @@ -942,6 +942,7 @@ int run_syscall(int min, int max) > int ret = 0; > void *p1, *p2; > int has_gettid = 1; > + int has_brk; > > /* <proc> indicates whether or not /proc is mounted */ > proc = stat("/proc", &stat_buf) == 0; > @@ -954,6 +955,9 @@ int run_syscall(int min, int max) > has_gettid = __GLIBC__ > 2 || (__GLIBC__ == 2 && __GLIBC_MINOR__ >= 30); > #endif > > + /* on musl setting brk()/sbrk() always fails */ > + has_brk = brk(0) == 0; > + > for (test = min; test >= 0 && test <= max; test++) { > int llen = 0; /* line length */ > > @@ -969,9 +973,9 @@ int run_syscall(int min, int max) > CASE_TEST(kill_0); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, kill(getpid(), 0)); break; > CASE_TEST(kill_CONT); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, kill(getpid(), 0)); break; > CASE_TEST(kill_BADPID); EXPECT_SYSER(1, kill(INT_MAX, 0), -1, ESRCH); break; > - CASE_TEST(sbrk_0); EXPECT_PTRNE(1, sbrk(0), (void *)-1); break; > - CASE_TEST(sbrk); if ((p1 = p2 = sbrk(4096)) != (void *)-1) p2 = sbrk(-4096); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, (p2 == (void *)-1) || p2 == p1); break; > - CASE_TEST(brk); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, brk(sbrk(0))); break; > + CASE_TEST(sbrk_0); EXPECT_PTRNE(has_brk, sbrk(0), (void *)-1); break; > + CASE_TEST(sbrk); if ((p1 = p2 = sbrk(4096)) != (void *)-1) p2 = sbrk(-4096); EXPECT_SYSZR(has_brk, (p2 == (void *)-1) || p2 == p1); break; > + CASE_TEST(brk); EXPECT_SYSZR(has_brk, brk(sbrk(0))); break; > CASE_TEST(chdir_root); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, chdir("/")); chdir(getenv("PWD")); break; > CASE_TEST(chdir_dot); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, chdir(".")); break; > CASE_TEST(chdir_blah); EXPECT_SYSER(1, chdir("/blah"), -1, ENOENT); break; Looks good, thank you Thomas! Willy
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 04:13:13AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 12:15:33AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > On musl calls to brk() and sbrk() always fail with ENOMEM. > > Detect this and skip the tests on musl. > > > > Tested on glibc 2.39 and musl 1.2.5 in addition to nolibc. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> > > --- > > tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 10 +++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c > > index 94bb6e11c16f..89be9ba95179 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c > > @@ -942,6 +942,7 @@ int run_syscall(int min, int max) > > int ret = 0; > > void *p1, *p2; > > int has_gettid = 1; > > + int has_brk; > > > > /* <proc> indicates whether or not /proc is mounted */ > > proc = stat("/proc", &stat_buf) == 0; > > @@ -954,6 +955,9 @@ int run_syscall(int min, int max) > > has_gettid = __GLIBC__ > 2 || (__GLIBC__ == 2 && __GLIBC_MINOR__ >= 30); > > #endif > > > > + /* on musl setting brk()/sbrk() always fails */ > > + has_brk = brk(0) == 0; > > + > > for (test = min; test >= 0 && test <= max; test++) { > > int llen = 0; /* line length */ > > > > @@ -969,9 +973,9 @@ int run_syscall(int min, int max) > > CASE_TEST(kill_0); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, kill(getpid(), 0)); break; > > CASE_TEST(kill_CONT); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, kill(getpid(), 0)); break; > > CASE_TEST(kill_BADPID); EXPECT_SYSER(1, kill(INT_MAX, 0), -1, ESRCH); break; > > - CASE_TEST(sbrk_0); EXPECT_PTRNE(1, sbrk(0), (void *)-1); break; > > - CASE_TEST(sbrk); if ((p1 = p2 = sbrk(4096)) != (void *)-1) p2 = sbrk(-4096); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, (p2 == (void *)-1) || p2 == p1); break; > > - CASE_TEST(brk); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, brk(sbrk(0))); break; > > + CASE_TEST(sbrk_0); EXPECT_PTRNE(has_brk, sbrk(0), (void *)-1); break; > > + CASE_TEST(sbrk); if ((p1 = p2 = sbrk(4096)) != (void *)-1) p2 = sbrk(-4096); EXPECT_SYSZR(has_brk, (p2 == (void *)-1) || p2 == p1); break; > > + CASE_TEST(brk); EXPECT_SYSZR(has_brk, brk(sbrk(0))); break; > > CASE_TEST(chdir_root); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, chdir("/")); chdir(getenv("PWD")); break; > > CASE_TEST(chdir_dot); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, chdir(".")); break; > > CASE_TEST(chdir_blah); EXPECT_SYSER(1, chdir("/blah"), -1, ENOENT); break; > > Looks good, thank you Thomas! BTW, Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Willy
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c index 94bb6e11c16f..89be9ba95179 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c @@ -942,6 +942,7 @@ int run_syscall(int min, int max) int ret = 0; void *p1, *p2; int has_gettid = 1; + int has_brk; /* <proc> indicates whether or not /proc is mounted */ proc = stat("/proc", &stat_buf) == 0; @@ -954,6 +955,9 @@ int run_syscall(int min, int max) has_gettid = __GLIBC__ > 2 || (__GLIBC__ == 2 && __GLIBC_MINOR__ >= 30); #endif + /* on musl setting brk()/sbrk() always fails */ + has_brk = brk(0) == 0; + for (test = min; test >= 0 && test <= max; test++) { int llen = 0; /* line length */ @@ -969,9 +973,9 @@ int run_syscall(int min, int max) CASE_TEST(kill_0); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, kill(getpid(), 0)); break; CASE_TEST(kill_CONT); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, kill(getpid(), 0)); break; CASE_TEST(kill_BADPID); EXPECT_SYSER(1, kill(INT_MAX, 0), -1, ESRCH); break; - CASE_TEST(sbrk_0); EXPECT_PTRNE(1, sbrk(0), (void *)-1); break; - CASE_TEST(sbrk); if ((p1 = p2 = sbrk(4096)) != (void *)-1) p2 = sbrk(-4096); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, (p2 == (void *)-1) || p2 == p1); break; - CASE_TEST(brk); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, brk(sbrk(0))); break; + CASE_TEST(sbrk_0); EXPECT_PTRNE(has_brk, sbrk(0), (void *)-1); break; + CASE_TEST(sbrk); if ((p1 = p2 = sbrk(4096)) != (void *)-1) p2 = sbrk(-4096); EXPECT_SYSZR(has_brk, (p2 == (void *)-1) || p2 == p1); break; + CASE_TEST(brk); EXPECT_SYSZR(has_brk, brk(sbrk(0))); break; CASE_TEST(chdir_root); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, chdir("/")); chdir(getenv("PWD")); break; CASE_TEST(chdir_dot); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, chdir(".")); break; CASE_TEST(chdir_blah); EXPECT_SYSER(1, chdir("/blah"), -1, ENOENT); break;
On musl calls to brk() and sbrk() always fail with ENOMEM. Detect this and skip the tests on musl. Tested on glibc 2.39 and musl 1.2.5 in addition to nolibc. Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> --- tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- base-commit: 0adab2b6b7336fb6ee3c6456a432dad3b1d25647 change-id: 20240423-nolibc-musl-brk-7784add29801 Best regards,