| Message ID | 20240610052810.1488793-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | f09db2b4f1b9ec245c8eaac0948cc37ba8d4cea3 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | MAINTAINERS: Add selftests/x86 entry | expand |
Kind reminder On 6/10/24 10:28 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > There are no maintainers specified for tools/testing/selftests/x86. > Shuah has mentioned [1] that the patches should go through x86 tree or > in special cases directly to Shuah's tree after getting ack-ed from x86 > maintainers. Different people have been confused when sending patches as > correct maintainers aren't found by get_maintainer.pl script. Fix > this by adding entry to MAINTAINERS file. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/90dc0dfc-4c67-4ea1-b705-0585d6e2ec47@linuxfoundation.org > > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 523d84b2d6139..f3a17e5d954a3 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -24378,6 +24378,7 @@ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86/core > F: Documentation/arch/x86/ > F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/x86/ > F: arch/x86/ > +F: tools/testing/selftests/x86 > > X86 ENTRY CODE > M: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Kind reminder On 7/2/24 3:17 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > Kind reminder > > On 6/10/24 10:28 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >> There are no maintainers specified for tools/testing/selftests/x86. >> Shuah has mentioned [1] that the patches should go through x86 tree or >> in special cases directly to Shuah's tree after getting ack-ed from x86 >> maintainers. Different people have been confused when sending patches as >> correct maintainers aren't found by get_maintainer.pl script. Fix >> this by adding entry to MAINTAINERS file. >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/90dc0dfc-4c67-4ea1-b705-0585d6e2ec47@linuxfoundation.org >> >> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> index 523d84b2d6139..f3a17e5d954a3 100644 >> --- a/MAINTAINERS >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> @@ -24378,6 +24378,7 @@ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86/core >> F: Documentation/arch/x86/ >> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/x86/ >> F: arch/x86/ >> +F: tools/testing/selftests/x86 >> >> X86 ENTRY CODE >> M: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> >
On 7/31/24 07:42, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > Kind reminder > > On 7/2/24 3:17 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >> Kind reminder Top post ??? >> >> On 6/10/24 10:28 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >>> There are no maintainers specified for tools/testing/selftests/x86. >>> Shuah has mentioned [1] that the patches should go through x86 tree or >>> in special cases directly to Shuah's tree after getting ack-ed from x86 >>> maintainers. Different people have been confused when sending patches as >>> correct maintainers aren't found by get_maintainer.pl script. Fix >>> this by adding entry to MAINTAINERS file. >>> >>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/90dc0dfc-4c67-4ea1-b705-0585d6e2ec47@linuxfoundation.org >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> >>> --- >>> MAINTAINERS | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> Applied to linux-kselftest next for Linux 6.12-rc1. thanks, -- Shuah
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 12:14:16PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 7/31/24 07:42, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > > Kind reminder > > > > On 7/2/24 3:17 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > > > Kind reminder > > Top post ??? > > > > > > > On 6/10/24 10:28 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > > > > There are no maintainers specified for tools/testing/selftests/x86. > > > > Shuah has mentioned [1] that the patches should go through x86 tree or > > > > in special cases directly to Shuah's tree after getting ack-ed from x86 > > > > maintainers. Different people have been confused when sending patches as > > > > correct maintainers aren't found by get_maintainer.pl script. Fix > > > > this by adding entry to MAINTAINERS file. > > > > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/90dc0dfc-4c67-4ea1-b705-0585d6e2ec47@linuxfoundation.org > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> > > > > --- > > > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > Applied to linux-kselftest next for Linux 6.12-rc1. You are applying things for the x86 entry, without an x86 ack, srsly?
On 7/31/24 15:23, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 12:14:16PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 7/31/24 07:42, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >>> Kind reminder >>> >>> On 7/2/24 3:17 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >>>> Kind reminder >> >> Top post ??? >> >>>> >>>> On 6/10/24 10:28 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >>>>> There are no maintainers specified for tools/testing/selftests/x86. >>>>> Shuah has mentioned [1] that the patches should go through x86 tree or >>>>> in special cases directly to Shuah's tree after getting ack-ed from x86 >>>>> maintainers. Different people have been confused when sending patches as >>>>> correct maintainers aren't found by get_maintainer.pl script. Fix >>>>> this by adding entry to MAINTAINERS file. >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/90dc0dfc-4c67-4ea1-b705-0585d6e2ec47@linuxfoundation.org >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> MAINTAINERS | 1 + >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>>> >> >> Applied to linux-kselftest next for Linux 6.12-rc1. > > You are applying things for the x86 entry, without an x86 ack, srsly? People are having problems with s86 selftests not making it to x86 lists. I figured it will make it easier for the x86 team. I don't have issues dropping this patch. thanks, -- Shuah
On 8/1/24 13:27, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 7/31/24 15:23, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 12:14:16PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: >>> On 7/31/24 07:42, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >>>> Kind reminder >>>> >>>> On 7/2/24 3:17 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >>>>> Kind reminder >>> >>> Top post ??? >>> >>>>> >>>>> On 6/10/24 10:28 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >>>>>> There are no maintainers specified for tools/testing/selftests/x86. >>>>>> Shuah has mentioned [1] that the patches should go through x86 tree or >>>>>> in special cases directly to Shuah's tree after getting ack-ed from x86 >>>>>> maintainers. Different people have been confused when sending patches as >>>>>> correct maintainers aren't found by get_maintainer.pl script. Fix >>>>>> this by adding entry to MAINTAINERS file. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/90dc0dfc-4c67-4ea1-b705-0585d6e2ec47@linuxfoundation.org >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> MAINTAINERS | 1 + >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>>>> >>> >>> Applied to linux-kselftest next for Linux 6.12-rc1. >> >> You are applying things for the x86 entry, without an x86 ack, srsly? > > People are having problems with s86 selftests not making it to x86 lists. > I figured it will make it easier for the x86 team. > > I don't have issues dropping this patch. > Dropped from my tree thanks, -- Shuah
On 6/9/24 22:28, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 523d84b2d6139..f3a17e5d954a3 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -24378,6 +24378,7 @@ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86/core > F: Documentation/arch/x86/ > F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/x86/ > F: arch/x86/ > +F: tools/testing/selftests/x86 I think this makes a lot of sense. We do at least need to get cc'd on this stuff. Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 523d84b2d6139..f3a17e5d954a3 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -24378,6 +24378,7 @@ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86/core F: Documentation/arch/x86/ F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/x86/ F: arch/x86/ +F: tools/testing/selftests/x86 X86 ENTRY CODE M: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
There are no maintainers specified for tools/testing/selftests/x86. Shuah has mentioned [1] that the patches should go through x86 tree or in special cases directly to Shuah's tree after getting ack-ed from x86 maintainers. Different people have been confused when sending patches as correct maintainers aren't found by get_maintainer.pl script. Fix this by adding entry to MAINTAINERS file. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/90dc0dfc-4c67-4ea1-b705-0585d6e2ec47@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)