@@ -198,6 +198,12 @@ static int follower_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
err = follower_init(follower);
if (err < 0)
return err;
+ for (ch = 0; ch < follower->info.count; ch++) {
+ if (ucontrol->value.integer.value[ch] < follower->info.min_val ||
+ ucontrol->value.integer.value[ch] > follower->info.max_val)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
for (ch = 0; ch < follower->info.count; ch++) {
if (follower->vals[ch] != ucontrol->value.integer.value[ch]) {
changed = 1;
@@ -365,6 +371,8 @@ static int master_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
new_val = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
if (new_val == old_val)
return 0;
+ if (new_val < master->info.min_val || new_val > master->info.max_val)
+ return -EINVAL;
err = sync_followers(master, old_val, new_val);
if (err < 0)
So far the vmaster code has been tolerant about the input values and accepts any values by correcting internally. But now our own selftest starts complaining about this behavior, so let's be picky and change the behavior to return -EINVAL for invalid input values instead. Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1d44be36-9bb9-4d82-8953-5ae2a4f09405@molgen.mpg.de Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> --- sound/core/vmaster.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)