From patchwork Fri Jul 5 08:35:12 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: liujing X-Patchwork-Id: 13724519 Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta4.chinamobile.com [111.22.67.137]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42AFD146018; Fri, 5 Jul 2024 08:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=111.22.67.137 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720168528; cv=none; b=I1Yz8apR6OQTzjTZXW3HYRakzLWhctcCq2A/Dk4bKP/k+X8WtfVXL3SbEC0rI6093Kk808jv+RTeTngTmpDprXN/Qq78/A7v7u8PzgfCj/ihW2daFFyXvLIVYqcx84KC7E7M8RRm9scoyzqOadQkRyZhCUtUHegrdf6TUjR76MA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720168528; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZEEb8Ts2Geg03O5VWO0y2Q6TSJ7QN5btw8o7LPflcCk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=bJT0RHng2/Cp61V303JsZvsT8BzuC91+ZDoyfCLtxu8RxHKGbI794ZIFSXCX/yNax1lJ2VV7yS0XRMtutebt74Bgt7Xq1FderWz4H6NoRKnG8NogVh+5rAa8xZe8M97NzdqR+D+xsYzhQ7mZo4AIb5KP9csEzquF5Sdb0wlbCOA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cmss.chinamobile.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cmss.chinamobile.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=111.22.67.137 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cmss.chinamobile.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cmss.chinamobile.com X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0 X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000 Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[10.188.0.87]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee46687b042ac0-d73af; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 16:35:15 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee46687b042ac0-d73af X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0 X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000 Received: from localhost.localdomain.localdomain (unknown[10.54.5.252]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr02-12002 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee26687b042064-10196; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 16:35:15 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee26687b042064-10196 From: Liu Jing To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com Subject: [PATCH] selftests/net: do_setcpu function not need to have a return value Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 16:35:12 +0800 Message-Id: <20240705083512.7108-1-liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 in the do_setcpu, this function does not need to have a return value, which is meaningless Signed-off-by: Liu Jing --- tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c index bdc03a2097e8..0b54f2011449 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static uint16_t get_ip_csum(const uint16_t *start, int num_words) return ~sum; } -static int do_setcpu(int cpu) +static void do_setcpu(int cpu) { cpu_set_t mask; @@ -129,7 +129,6 @@ static int do_setcpu(int cpu) else if (cfg_verbose) fprintf(stderr, "cpu: %u\n", cpu); - return 0; } static void do_setsockopt(int fd, int level, int optname, int val)