| Message ID | 20241010-extensible-structs-check_fields-v3-5-d2833dfe6edd@cyphar.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | extensible syscalls: CHECK_FIELDS to allow for easier feature detection | expand |
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c index 5790ab446527..4ca175a16ad6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c @@ -112,9 +112,9 @@ void test_openat2_struct(void) * * This is effectively to check that is_zeroed_user() works. */ - copy = malloc(misalign + sizeof(how_ext)); + copy = malloc(misalign*2 + sizeof(how_ext)); how_copy = copy + misalign; - memset(copy, 0xff, misalign); + memset(copy, 0xff, misalign*2 + sizeof(how_ext)); memcpy(how_copy, &how_ext, sizeof(how_ext)); }
We should also verify that poisoned data after a misaligned struct is also handled correctly by is_zeroed_user(). This test passes with no kernel changes needed, so is_zeroed_user() was correct already. Fixes: b28a10aedcd4 ("selftests: add openat2(2) selftests") Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)