From patchwork Tue Oct 29 23:44:32 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Deepak Gupta X-Patchwork-Id: 13855682 Received: from mail-pg1-f181.google.com (mail-pg1-f181.google.com [209.85.215.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 035C0216A38 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 23:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.181 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730245544; cv=none; b=k89/3l7NMYUiQJeF4GU4Swzq+lNsFEwm8Sqf9i3Wks1sErxF3QJa2zySrCuZ1Db3G3mGrzPJkhVy5e/5/sZjN5kmLPqYcBDETFo6iczyDvJkRLBmNFker/xokRsAPJHg+Typ1yCKO0BMunNZmeJ3ilgdXlzraDL4j5iA04A9B5s= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730245544; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Di4fIpjKKAp11Bvhyx2OtbqI03W5bwK7fjXpANJe7Tk=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=BTLELE2RLVNMjqekFi4Y2GgWz9kcBz/LGK9u0H6+1QkURj8JVArNdvmSIZ+l1lF/XQiEf72m2Psv49C3oFIKN257WcfddmTboWN4T7tW0dkIzvhA+OtHZUZ3ZYaQmSPwO9S4RhkkIS0xUfsY1EXJ4yU+kamIlhkvNqxLkLEe0fs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=kTVZclJy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.181 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="kTVZclJy" Received: by mail-pg1-f181.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-7ae3d7222d4so4663901a12.3 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:45:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1730245540; x=1730850340; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ESn9fCOiwm5fyNjtFShGIII5bqF5wu11eYPz8YfBFBM=; b=kTVZclJy7OgKrIyfSRKRFxjv26pbSBNRBsTQOQgwzoWLBmM2PaW6nSfBRg8GtJza3V qOjR+XwodyP+Z5zADAKkXHB69Iv/5HR7OretNmo4pkc1j47/RqKzTyJBhJLusqwpRZVB l8cIpGB5YEpOHtIje/tCxiMdWwfxTsPsJFCf8uhcBrsl3WIzY07+pZK4llTn6zOlAbOk jDWFMTIzgf97+wQ4uJyc0M4siODwA0EZ3myq/xccKbrhGr1xxGJ9iLCkNLD66CbBStEp PeiHVwkdYUDKN2cc6J6s62XSzxxIoWZ6DOmESdxrP+ybwbHJa/CHdksU9J+qoYo1ruHC SywQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730245540; x=1730850340; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ESn9fCOiwm5fyNjtFShGIII5bqF5wu11eYPz8YfBFBM=; b=dIi4Lk/oy4Yt2E5Oq+53obLMXgvgXI0XPx5W0Nd2omrcw6bU1tvs+yhP6Plk9yYqiY MT7mgjnyAlYRpbxaZMTgn6ObJWfsco5LNf+lBPMZENpbwc7dOUEFFRsYqNGJA+6swrxK TVjPIE1oFxfwWTEwRcv2mFKDkcm/1t+r0juipiAEkLm0D3Ev3AoyfgdOwhwuTck3Svau LElJc2kyA9t+uVyfpcg6x+pRysNV3ecwxt7oLJe9Z//4XXxCA0FWM6U8skK4womBjrBt M3ejN2MFXizJDjv5Fxgy93kZa8pAN7JWYgN7xFz61/EgxivYudNrwNdoKjkVyHym/itn cbJw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVPxJSrydG5eb4csUEzv2YYiSpRrprYUj2eLIt6oB+tiXNfDv3iMV3DY5/PxqqQ4ZR4LHn6pUlTDjj9mYEFhDI=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzG0FdNc/uU8gEIlow7D8TKFFaofBQXJHaY/DTdBEeb5sY6NdXx AeiNEiMGg2nDBbgP/rSKAAdmPtp8I1bkQ7Q4rqplcAFjy2bjy+ur5vbl/KHMYAc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEytQZucsJ+hJdUwJv+i4MvSm0k7IRK7pe4lpkwmubFdxEfm5N4vCdn3llj+Ve3wC6Nnd0sOg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:b68a:b0:1d9:18e2:e09d with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1d9a850a6e0mr18880194637.44.1730245540131; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:45:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debug.ba.rivosinc.com ([64.71.180.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-72057921863sm8157643b3a.33.2024.10.29.16.45.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:45:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Deepak Gupta Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:44:32 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v7 32/32] kselftest/riscv: kselftest for user mode cfi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20241029-v5_user_cfi_series-v7-32-2727ce9936cb@rivosinc.com> References: <20241029-v5_user_cfi_series-v7-0-2727ce9936cb@rivosinc.com> In-Reply-To: <20241029-v5_user_cfi_series-v7-0-2727ce9936cb@rivosinc.com> To: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , "Liam R. Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Lorenzo Stoakes , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Conor Dooley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Arnd Bergmann , Christian Brauner , Peter Zijlstra , Oleg Nesterov , Eric Biederman , Kees Cook , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, alistair.francis@wdc.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, jim.shu@sifive.com, andybnac@gmail.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com, charlie@rivosinc.com, atishp@rivosinc.com, evan@rivosinc.com, cleger@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com, samitolvanen@google.com, broonie@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, Deepak Gupta X-Mailer: b4 0.14.0 Adds kselftest for RISC-V control flow integrity implementation for user mode. There is not a lot going on in kernel for enabling landing pad for user mode. cfi selftest are intended to be compiled with zicfilp and zicfiss enabled compiler. Thus kselftest simply checks if landing pad and shadow stack for the binary and process are enabled or not. selftest then register a signal handler for SIGSEGV. Any control flow violation are reported as SIGSEGV with si_code = SEGV_CPERR. Test will fail on receiving any SEGV_CPERR. Shadow stack part has more changes in kernel and thus there are separate tests for that - Exercise `map_shadow_stack` syscall - `fork` test to make sure COW works for shadow stack pages - gup tests Kernel uses FOLL_FORCE when access happens to memory via /proc//mem. Not breaking that for shadow stack. - signal test. Make sure signal delivery results in token creation on shadow stack and consumes (and verifies) token on sigreturn - shadow stack protection test. attempts to write using regular store instruction on shadow stack memory must result in access faults Test outut ========== """ TAP version 13 1..5 This is to ensure shadow stack is indeed enabled and working This is to ensure shadow stack is indeed enabled and working ok 1 shstk fork test ok 2 map shadow stack syscall ok 3 shadow stack gup tests ok 4 shadow stack signal tests ok 5 memory protections of shadow stack memory """ Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta --- tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/.gitignore | 3 + tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/Makefile | 10 + tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/cfi_rv_test.h | 84 +++++ tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/riscv_cfi_test.c | 78 +++++ tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/shadowstack.c | 373 +++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/shadowstack.h | 37 ++ 7 files changed, 586 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile index 7ce03d832b64..6e142fe004ab 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ ARCH ?= $(shell uname -m 2>/dev/null || echo not) ifneq (,$(filter $(ARCH),riscv)) -RISCV_SUBTARGETS ?= hwprobe vector mm sigreturn +RISCV_SUBTARGETS ?= hwprobe vector mm sigreturn cfi else RISCV_SUBTARGETS := endif diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..82545863bac6 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +cfitests +riscv_cfi_test +shadowstack diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..b65f7ff38a32 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +CFLAGS += -I$(top_srcdir)/tools/include + +CFLAGS += -march=rv64gc_zicfilp_zicfiss + +TEST_GEN_PROGS := cfitests + +include ../../lib.mk + +$(OUTPUT)/cfitests: riscv_cfi_test.c shadowstack.c + $(CC) -o$@ $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $^ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/cfi_rv_test.h b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/cfi_rv_test.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..0fefdc33f71e --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/cfi_rv_test.h @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ + +#ifndef SELFTEST_RISCV_CFI_H +#define SELFTEST_RISCV_CFI_H +#include +#include +#include "shadowstack.h" + +#define RISCV_CFI_SELFTEST_COUNT RISCV_SHADOW_STACK_TESTS + +#define CHILD_EXIT_CODE_SSWRITE 10 +#define CHILD_EXIT_CODE_SIG_TEST 11 + +#define my_syscall5(num, arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5) \ +({ \ + register long _num __asm__ ("a7") = (num); \ + register long _arg1 __asm__ ("a0") = (long)(arg1); \ + register long _arg2 __asm__ ("a1") = (long)(arg2); \ + register long _arg3 __asm__ ("a2") = (long)(arg3); \ + register long _arg4 __asm__ ("a3") = (long)(arg4); \ + register long _arg5 __asm__ ("a4") = (long)(arg5); \ + \ + __asm__ volatile( \ + "ecall\n" \ + : "+r" \ + (_arg1) \ + : "r"(_arg2), "r"(_arg3), "r"(_arg4), "r"(_arg5), \ + "r"(_num) \ + : "memory", "cc" \ + ); \ + _arg1; \ +}) + +#define my_syscall3(num, arg1, arg2, arg3) \ +({ \ + register long _num __asm__ ("a7") = (num); \ + register long _arg1 __asm__ ("a0") = (long)(arg1); \ + register long _arg2 __asm__ ("a1") = (long)(arg2); \ + register long _arg3 __asm__ ("a2") = (long)(arg3); \ + \ + __asm__ volatile( \ + "ecall\n" \ + : "+r" (_arg1) \ + : "r"(_arg2), "r"(_arg3), \ + "r"(_num) \ + : "memory", "cc" \ + ); \ + _arg1; \ +}) + +#ifndef __NR_prctl +#define __NR_prctl 167 +#endif + +#ifndef __NR_map_shadow_stack +#define __NR_map_shadow_stack 453 +#endif + +#define CSR_SSP 0x011 + +#ifdef __ASSEMBLY__ +#define __ASM_STR(x) x +#else +#define __ASM_STR(x) #x +#endif + +#define csr_read(csr) \ +({ \ + register unsigned long __v; \ + __asm__ __volatile__ ("csrr %0, " __ASM_STR(csr) \ + : "=r" (__v) : \ + : "memory"); \ + __v; \ +}) + +#define csr_write(csr, val) \ +({ \ + unsigned long __v = (unsigned long) (val); \ + __asm__ __volatile__ ("csrw " __ASM_STR(csr) ", %0" \ + : : "rK" (__v) \ + : "memory"); \ +}) + +#endif diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/riscv_cfi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/riscv_cfi_test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7f04a935f79f --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/riscv_cfi_test.c @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only + +#include "../../kselftest.h" +#include +#include +#include +#include "cfi_rv_test.h" + +/* do not optimize cfi related test functions */ +#pragma GCC push_options +#pragma GCC optimize("O0") + +void sigsegv_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *uc) +{ + struct ucontext *ctx = (struct ucontext *) uc; + + if (si->si_code == SEGV_CPERR) { + ksft_print_msg("Control flow violation happened somewhere\n"); + ksft_print_msg("PC where violation happened %lx\n", ctx->uc_mcontext.gregs[0]); + exit(-1); + } + + /* all other cases are expected to be of shadow stack write case */ + exit(CHILD_EXIT_CODE_SSWRITE); +} + +bool register_signal_handler(void) +{ + struct sigaction sa = {}; + + sa.sa_sigaction = sigsegv_handler; + sa.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO; + if (sigaction(SIGSEGV, &sa, NULL)) { + ksft_print_msg("Registering signal handler for landing pad violation failed\n"); + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) +{ + int ret = 0; + unsigned long lpad_status = 0, ss_status = 0; + + ksft_print_header(); + + ksft_print_msg("Starting risc-v tests\n"); + + /* + * Landing pad test. Not a lot of kernel changes to support landing + * pad for user mode except lighting up a bit in senvcfg via a prctl + * Enable landing pad through out the execution of test binary + */ + ret = my_syscall5(__NR_prctl, PR_GET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS, &lpad_status, 0, 0, 0); + if (ret) + ksft_exit_fail_msg("Get landing pad status failed with %d\n", ret); + + if (!(lpad_status & PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE)) + ksft_exit_fail_msg("Landing pad is not enabled, should be enabled via glibc\n"); + + ret = my_syscall5(__NR_prctl, PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, &ss_status, 0, 0, 0); + if (ret) + ksft_exit_fail_msg("Get shadow stack failed with %d\n", ret); + + if (!(ss_status & PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE)) + ksft_exit_fail_msg("Shadow stack is not enabled, should be enabled via glibc\n"); + + if (!register_signal_handler()) + ksft_exit_fail_msg("Registering signal handler for SIGSEGV failed\n"); + + ksft_print_msg("Landing pad and shadow stack are enabled for binary\n"); + execute_shadow_stack_tests(); + + return 0; +} + +#pragma GCC pop_options diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/shadowstack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/shadowstack.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..9d5301914578 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/shadowstack.c @@ -0,0 +1,373 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only + +#include "../../kselftest.h" +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include "shadowstack.h" +#include "cfi_rv_test.h" + +/* do not optimize shadow stack related test functions */ +#pragma GCC push_options +#pragma GCC optimize("O0") + +void zar(void) +{ + unsigned long ssp = 0; + + ssp = csr_read(CSR_SSP); + ksft_print_msg("Spewing out shadow stack ptr: %lx\n" + " This is to ensure shadow stack is indeed enabled and working\n", + ssp); +} + +void bar(void) +{ + zar(); +} + +void foo(void) +{ + bar(); +} + +void zar_child(void) +{ + unsigned long ssp = 0; + + ssp = csr_read(CSR_SSP); + ksft_print_msg("Spewing out shadow stack ptr: %lx\n" + " This is to ensure shadow stack is indeed enabled and working\n", + ssp); +} + +void bar_child(void) +{ + zar_child(); +} + +void foo_child(void) +{ + bar_child(); +} + +typedef void (call_func_ptr)(void); +/* + * call couple of functions to test push pop. + */ +int shadow_stack_call_tests(call_func_ptr fn_ptr, bool parent) +{ + ksft_print_msg("Exercising dummy calls for sspush and sspopchk in" + " context of %s\n", parent ? "parent" : "child"); + + (fn_ptr)(); + + return 0; +} + +/* forks a thread, and ensure shadow stacks fork out */ +bool shadow_stack_fork_test(unsigned long test_num, void *ctx) +{ + int pid = 0, child_status = 0, parent_pid = 0, ret = 0; + unsigned long ss_status = 0; + + ksft_print_msg("Exercising shadow stack fork test\n"); + + ret = my_syscall5(__NR_prctl, PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, &ss_status, 0, 0, 0); + if (ret) { + ksft_exit_skip("Shadow stack get status prctl failed with errorcode %d\n", ret); + return false; + } + + if (!(ss_status & PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE)) + ksft_exit_skip("Shadow stack is not enabled, should be enabled via glibc\n"); + + parent_pid = getpid(); + pid = fork(); + + if (pid) { + ksft_print_msg("Parent pid %d and child pid %d\n", parent_pid, pid); + shadow_stack_call_tests(&foo, true); + } else + shadow_stack_call_tests(&foo_child, false); + + if (pid) { + ksft_print_msg("Waiting on child to finish\n"); + wait(&child_status); + } else { + /* exit child gracefully */ + exit(0); + } + + if (pid && WIFSIGNALED(child_status)) { + ksft_print_msg("Child faulted, fork test failed\n"); + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +/* exercise `map_shadow_stack`, pivot to it and call some functions to ensure it works */ +#define SHADOW_STACK_ALLOC_SIZE 4096 +bool shadow_stack_map_test(unsigned long test_num, void *ctx) +{ + unsigned long shdw_addr; + int ret = 0; + + ksft_print_msg("Exercising shadow stack map test\n"); + + shdw_addr = my_syscall3(__NR_map_shadow_stack, NULL, SHADOW_STACK_ALLOC_SIZE, 0); + + if (((long) shdw_addr) <= 0) { + ksft_print_msg("map_shadow_stack failed with error code %d\n", (int) shdw_addr); + return false; + } + + ret = munmap((void *) shdw_addr, SHADOW_STACK_ALLOC_SIZE); + + if (ret) { + ksft_print_msg("munmap failed with error code %d\n", ret); + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +/* + * shadow stack protection tests. map a shadow stack and + * validate all memory protections work on it + */ +bool shadow_stack_protection_test(unsigned long test_num, void *ctx) +{ + unsigned long shdw_addr; + unsigned long *write_addr = NULL; + int ret = 0, pid = 0, child_status = 0; + + ksft_print_msg("Exercising shadow stack protection test\n"); + + shdw_addr = my_syscall3(__NR_map_shadow_stack, NULL, SHADOW_STACK_ALLOC_SIZE, 0); + + if (((long) shdw_addr) <= 0) { + ksft_print_msg("map_shadow_stack failed with error code %d\n", (int) shdw_addr); + return false; + } + + write_addr = (unsigned long *) shdw_addr; + pid = fork(); + + /* no child was created, return false */ + if (pid == -1) + return false; + + /* + * try to perform a store from child on shadow stack memory + * it should result in SIGSEGV + */ + if (!pid) { + /* below write must lead to SIGSEGV */ + *write_addr = 0xdeadbeef; + } else { + wait(&child_status); + } + + /* test fail, if 0xdeadbeef present on shadow stack address */ + if (*write_addr == 0xdeadbeef) { + ksft_print_msg("Write suceeded on shadow stack memory, shadow stack protection test" + " failed\n"); + return false; + } + + /* if child reached here, then fail */ + if (!pid) { + ksft_print_msg("Shadow stack protection test: child reached unreachable state\n"); + return false; + } + + /* if child exited via signal handler but not for write on ss */ + if (WIFEXITED(child_status) && + WEXITSTATUS(child_status) != CHILD_EXIT_CODE_SSWRITE) { + ksft_print_msg("Shadow stack protection test: child wasn't signaled for write on" + " shadow stack\n"); + return false; + } + + ret = munmap(write_addr, SHADOW_STACK_ALLOC_SIZE); + if (ret) { + ksft_print_msg("Shadow stack protection test: munmap failed with error code %d\n", + ret); + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +#define SS_MAGIC_WRITE_VAL 0xbeefdead + +int gup_tests(int mem_fd, unsigned long *shdw_addr) +{ + unsigned long val = 0; + + lseek(mem_fd, (unsigned long)shdw_addr, SEEK_SET); + if (read(mem_fd, &val, sizeof(val)) < 0) { + ksft_print_msg("Reading shadow stack mem via gup failed\n"); + return 1; + } + + val = SS_MAGIC_WRITE_VAL; + lseek(mem_fd, (unsigned long)shdw_addr, SEEK_SET); + if (write(mem_fd, &val, sizeof(val)) < 0) { + ksft_print_msg("Writing shadow stack mem via gup failed\n"); + return 1; + } + + if (*shdw_addr != SS_MAGIC_WRITE_VAL) { + ksft_print_msg("GUP write to shadow stack memory failed\n"); + return 1; + } + + return 0; +} + +bool shadow_stack_gup_tests(unsigned long test_num, void *ctx) +{ + unsigned long shdw_addr = 0; + unsigned long *write_addr = NULL; + int fd = 0; + bool ret = false; + + ksft_print_msg("Exercising shadow stack gup tests\n"); + shdw_addr = my_syscall3(__NR_map_shadow_stack, NULL, SHADOW_STACK_ALLOC_SIZE, 0); + + if (((long) shdw_addr) <= 0) { + ksft_print_msg("map_shadow_stack failed with error code %d\n", (int) shdw_addr); + return false; + } + + write_addr = (unsigned long *) shdw_addr; + + fd = open("/proc/self/mem", O_RDWR); + if (fd == -1) + return false; + + if (gup_tests(fd, write_addr)) { + ksft_print_msg("gup tests failed\n"); + goto out; + } + + ret = true; +out: + if (shdw_addr && munmap(write_addr, SHADOW_STACK_ALLOC_SIZE)) { + ksft_print_msg("munmap failed with error code %d\n", ret); + ret = false; + } + + return ret; +} + +volatile bool break_loop; + +void sigusr1_handler(int signo) +{ + break_loop = true; +} + +bool sigusr1_signal_test(void) +{ + struct sigaction sa = {}; + + sa.sa_handler = sigusr1_handler; + sa.sa_flags = 0; + sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask); + if (sigaction(SIGUSR1, &sa, NULL)) { + ksft_print_msg("Registering signal handler for SIGUSR1 failed\n"); + return false; + } + + return true; +} +/* + * shadow stack signal test. shadow stack must be enabled. + * register a signal, fork another thread which is waiting + * on signal. Send a signal from parent to child, verify + * that signal was received by child. If not test fails + */ +bool shadow_stack_signal_test(unsigned long test_num, void *ctx) +{ + int pid = 0, child_status = 0, ret = 0; + unsigned long ss_status = 0; + + ksft_print_msg("Exercising shadow stack signal test\n"); + + ret = my_syscall5(__NR_prctl, PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, &ss_status, 0, 0, 0); + if (ret) { + ksft_print_msg("Shadow stack get status prctl failed with errorcode %d\n", ret); + return false; + } + + if (!(ss_status & PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE)) + ksft_print_msg("Shadow stack is not enabled, should be enabled via glibc\n"); + + /* this should be caught by signal handler and do an exit */ + if (!sigusr1_signal_test()) { + ksft_print_msg("Registering sigusr1 handler failed\n"); + exit(-1); + } + + pid = fork(); + + if (pid == -1) { + ksft_print_msg("Signal test: fork failed\n"); + goto out; + } + + if (pid == 0) { + while (!break_loop) + sleep(1); + + exit(11); + /* child shouldn't go beyond here */ + } + + /* send SIGUSR1 to child */ + kill(pid, SIGUSR1); + wait(&child_status); + +out: + + return (WIFEXITED(child_status) && + WEXITSTATUS(child_status) == 11); +} + +int execute_shadow_stack_tests(void) +{ + int ret = 0; + unsigned long test_count = 0; + unsigned long shstk_status = 0; + bool test_pass = false; + + ksft_print_msg("Executing RISC-V shadow stack self tests\n"); + ksft_set_plan(RISCV_SHADOW_STACK_TESTS); + + ret = my_syscall5(__NR_prctl, PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, &shstk_status, 0, 0, 0); + + if (ret != 0) + ksft_exit_fail_msg("Get shadow stack status failed with %d\n", ret); + + /* + * If we are here that means get shadow stack status succeeded and + * thus shadow stack support is baked in the kernel. + */ + while (test_count < ARRAY_SIZE(shstk_tests)) { + test_pass = (*shstk_tests[test_count].t_func)(test_count, NULL); + ksft_test_result(test_pass, shstk_tests[test_count].name); + test_count++; + } + + ksft_finished(); + + return 0; +} + +#pragma GCC pop_options diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/shadowstack.h b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/shadowstack.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..b43e74136a26 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/shadowstack.h @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ + +#ifndef SELFTEST_SHADOWSTACK_TEST_H +#define SELFTEST_SHADOWSTACK_TEST_H +#include +#include + +/* + * a cfi test returns true for success or false for fail + * takes a number for test number to index into array and void pointer. + */ +typedef bool (*shstk_test_func)(unsigned long test_num, void *); + +struct shadow_stack_tests { + char *name; + shstk_test_func t_func; +}; + +bool shadow_stack_fork_test(unsigned long test_num, void *ctx); +bool shadow_stack_map_test(unsigned long test_num, void *ctx); +bool shadow_stack_protection_test(unsigned long test_num, void *ctx); +bool shadow_stack_gup_tests(unsigned long test_num, void *ctx); +bool shadow_stack_signal_test(unsigned long test_num, void *ctx); + +static struct shadow_stack_tests shstk_tests[] = { + { "shstk fork test\n", shadow_stack_fork_test }, + { "map shadow stack syscall\n", shadow_stack_map_test }, + { "shadow stack gup tests\n", shadow_stack_gup_tests }, + { "shadow stack signal tests\n", shadow_stack_signal_test}, + { "memory protections of shadow stack memory\n", shadow_stack_protection_test } +}; + +#define RISCV_SHADOW_STACK_TESTS ARRAY_SIZE(shstk_tests) + +int execute_shadow_stack_tests(void); + +#endif