diff mbox series

[bpf-next,1/1] selftests/bpf: Enable Tx hwtstamp in xdp_hw_metadata

Message ID 20241204115715.3148412-1-yoong.siang.song@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series [bpf-next,1/1] selftests/bpf: Enable Tx hwtstamp in xdp_hw_metadata | expand

Commit Message

Song, Yoong Siang Dec. 4, 2024, 11:57 a.m. UTC
Set tx_type to HWTSTAMP_TX_ON to enable hardware timestamping for all
outgoing packets.

Besides, set XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN flag to reserve tx_metadata_len bytes
of per-chunk metadata.

Signed-off-by: Song Yoong Siang <yoong.siang.song@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Stanislav Fomichev Dec. 4, 2024, 3:48 p.m. UTC | #1
On 12/04, Song Yoong Siang wrote:
> Set tx_type to HWTSTAMP_TX_ON to enable hardware timestamping for all
> outgoing packets.
> 
> Besides, set XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN flag to reserve tx_metadata_len bytes
> of per-chunk metadata.

XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN is missing after d5e726d9143c ("xsk: Require
XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN to actuate tx_metadata_len"), so that make
sense. Maybe add a fixes tag?

And I don't see mlx5 looking at HWTSTAMP_TX anywhere in the drivers,
so I'm assuming that's why I didn't need HWTSTAMP_TX_ON during my tests..
Which device are you testing against? I do see some hwts_tx_en
checks in the stfmmac at least... Can you add these details to the
commit message and respin?

With the above addressed:
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Song, Yoong Siang Dec. 5, 2024, 1:36 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wednesday, December 4, 2024 11:49 PM, Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 12/04, Song Yoong Siang wrote:
>> Set tx_type to HWTSTAMP_TX_ON to enable hardware timestamping for all
>> outgoing packets.
>>
>> Besides, set XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN flag to reserve tx_metadata_len bytes
>> of per-chunk metadata.
>
>XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN is missing after d5e726d9143c ("xsk: Require
>XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN to actuate tx_metadata_len"), so that make
>sense. Maybe add a fixes tag?
>

Sure. I will add the fixes tag and submit with "PATCH bpf" prefix
in next version.

>And I don't see mlx5 looking at HWTSTAMP_TX anywhere in the drivers,
>so I'm assuming that's why I didn't need HWTSTAMP_TX_ON during my tests..
>Which device are you testing against? I do see some hwts_tx_en
>checks in the stfmmac at least... Can you add these details to the
>commit message and respin?
>

I am testing on stmmac and igc drivers.
You are right, stmmac needs it for hwts_tx_en check.
Besides, igc needs it to set IGC_RING_FLAG_TX_HWTSTAMP flag.

Without this patch, user will need to manually enable tx hwts using
command: sudo hwstamp_ctl -i eth0 -t 1 -r 1
after start xdp_hw_metadata.

Therefore, adding HWTSTAMP_TX_ON is not a bug fix solution.
I will separate this as another new patch to "PATCH bpf-next"
and provide detail in commit message.

Btw, is mlx5 driver always enable Tx HWTS?

>With the above addressed:
>Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>

Thanks & Regards
Siang
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
index 06266aad2f99..6f7b15d6c6ed 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@  static int open_xsk(int ifindex, struct xsk *xsk, __u32 queue_id)
 		.fill_size = XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS,
 		.comp_size = XSK_RING_CONS__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS,
 		.frame_size = XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FRAME_SIZE,
-		.flags = XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FLAGS,
+		.flags = XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN,
 		.tx_metadata_len = sizeof(struct xsk_tx_metadata),
 	};
 	__u32 idx = 0;
@@ -551,6 +551,7 @@  static void hwtstamp_enable(const char *ifname)
 {
 	struct hwtstamp_config cfg = {
 		.rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL,
+		.tx_type = HWTSTAMP_TX_ON,
 	};
 
 	hwtstamp_ioctl(SIOCGHWTSTAMP, ifname, &saved_hwtstamp_cfg);