Message ID | 79f565afd45e9f4a72a4b84ea80df63b78c47d21.1589835155.git.sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=XKKz=7A=vger.kernel.org=linux-kselftest-owner@kernel.org> Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6BF739 for <patchwork-linux-kselftest@patchwork.kernel.org>; Mon, 18 May 2020 22:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C34D208A7 for <patchwork-linux-kselftest@patchwork.kernel.org>; Mon, 18 May 2020 22:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726502AbgERWOD (ORCPT <rfc822;patchwork-linux-kselftest@patchwork.kernel.org>); Mon, 18 May 2020 18:14:03 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:46558 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728187AbgERWOD (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 18 May 2020 18:14:03 -0400 IronPort-SDR: cYbjDqWQtKvwtrnxtN9BT+zPhOX5t8AbSfj9cx7nmE15DHdWQ57RsXHvjotQtP3f29MbpBvWkS 260srG4v4EDw== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 May 2020 15:14:03 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 8c7bcOzsKScHuj0VCzI/7onjkTWO+S9RkyZcw5MEhjDFY0CqhigLwfUuHo5FX7ln6LSP2SPwRr kzZU1gw6v2FQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,407,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="411420450" Received: from sai-dev-mach.sc.intel.com ([143.183.140.153]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 May 2020 15:14:02 -0700 From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> To: shuah@kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, tony.luck@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, babu.moger@amd.com, james.morse@arm.com, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, dcb314@hotmail.com, Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> Subject: [PATCH V2 17/19] selftests/resctrl: Unmount resctrl FS after running all tests Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 15:08:37 -0700 Message-Id: <79f565afd45e9f4a72a4b84ea80df63b78c47d21.1589835155.git.sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <cover.1589835155.git.sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> References: <cover.1589835155.git.sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org |
Series |
Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests
|
expand
|
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c index d45ae004ed77..a0c14555d259 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) } out: + umount_resctrlfs(); printf("1..%d\n", tests_run); return 0;
validate_resctrl_feature_request() would mount resctrl FS (if not already mounted) to check if a requested feature is supported by the platform or not. There could be situations where in all the resctrl tests are skipped and hence main() function would return leaving the resctrl FS mounted. To avoid resctrl FS being mounted, unmount resctrl FS before returning. This shouldn't have any impact on the cases where all the tests might get to run (or some of the test cases might get to run and the individual tests unmount resctrl FS) because umount_resctrlfs() attempts to unmount resctrl FS only if it's mounted. Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)