From patchwork Thu Oct 24 21:18:43 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Reinette Chatre X-Patchwork-Id: 13849739 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE3EF21832E; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 21:08:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729804089; cv=none; b=qv5AX9fQ9sjTfu/MtZnyrqkGgDtOhigfIY2Pwy3R6Z43gS0OLP91YkpH6kqPobxJ+29+KHG9vSqdgEr6KsP9WFJ8w+Hc+VznM1z6Dq8IYLo6Vl/08RlnhyE58KJ9J5nqBQlXkIqwbrCuQDkj3pDEee6Q8WW4uDLQTMgorZ1Ruxs= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729804089; c=relaxed/simple; bh=K3dDL/ARG9AHDi3oOFzH+WG7DuBUfvcX+mwZNnT6MGw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SeUtLL8MYf82Iyom2ifP6O3JjcJYAyXynxaIaL5LWwWhDxzMmNqR2YkPNePFhf01UolF47M3nyIlcDYaOUWfxlgjElqtcnCmUlf267zTZ1OnHi+H6wuP6V5XzLKRRQO+4be2Ap/GP7GQwlnH2Nh+nIjKE9mmn/SgktvW2YwWT9o= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=atis4df6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="atis4df6" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1729804087; x=1761340087; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K3dDL/ARG9AHDi3oOFzH+WG7DuBUfvcX+mwZNnT6MGw=; b=atis4df6Kg3mK63XiapyT0N2N/xCG+YVZkfhwvzzOxgsKa66PQkUQ5IO DEaU76AtVG1mOWZxnlPsahpYnFVZk/NDwYgMI75lrU0CmT9fkhDoclqG2 mHb86j+j6eSwvJijJ1ETs03cjNx2rDIBm7DWXuopWPGn6BcmBAJoH9+ej 04kU0PlMSwUi+daDTyqdQUSv9qF5ZzaOev5UHLi5+3H19rUAn8jzuQiPu VLNDVAjhYodNkGKHpNZRqjCxON4EYG4X63VNlTVh6p/W6FY5lyGBwlrjs Irh6G/Xk91JTXZc/S6DpriYmZ3yflChFPggphkaM55HyK9WbmIicpvZ13 A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: j/dPH2bnSTWh3m5F6lOX2A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: O5hFrmLEQLKr7/qQOV+Edg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11235"; a="17090905" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,230,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="17090905" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Oct 2024 14:08:01 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: TK8Vk/jXR1qcmmLPcEbsvw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: e9NfCFGfR6eApHvDs72UQA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,199,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="85488036" Received: from rchatre-desk1.jf.intel.com ([10.165.154.99]) by ORVIESA003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Oct 2024 14:08:01 -0700 From: Reinette Chatre To: fenghua.yu@intel.com, shuah@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, peternewman@google.com, babu.moger@amd.com, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com Cc: maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH V4 06/15] selftests/resctrl: Make wraparound handling obvious Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:18:43 -0700 Message-ID: <890c35b8c7b1aef384db0a1f9042322cf2dd23c8.1729804024.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.0 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Within mba_setup() the programmed bandwidth delay value starts at the maximum (100, or rather ALLOCATION_MAX) and progresses towards ALLOCATION_MIN by decrementing with ALLOCATION_STEP. The programmed bandwidth delay should never be negative, so representing it with an unsigned int is most appropriate. This may introduce confusion because of the "allocation > ALLOCATION_MAX" check used to check wraparound of the subtraction. Modify the mba_setup() flow to start at the minimum, ALLOCATION_MIN, and incrementally, with ALLOCATION_STEP steps, adjust the bandwidth delay value. This avoids wraparound while making the purpose of "allocation > ALLOCATION_MAX" clear and eliminates the need for the "allocation < ALLOCATION_MIN" check. Reported-by: Ilpo Järvinen Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1903ac13-5c9c-ef8d-78e0-417ac34a971b@linux.intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen --- Changes since V1: - New patch - Add Ilpo's Reviewed-by tag. --- tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c index ab8496a4925b..da40a8ed4413 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c @@ -39,7 +39,8 @@ static int mba_setup(const struct resctrl_test *test, const struct user_params *uparams, struct resctrl_val_param *p) { - static int runs_per_allocation, allocation = 100; + static unsigned int allocation = ALLOCATION_MIN; + static int runs_per_allocation; char allocation_str[64]; int ret; @@ -50,7 +51,7 @@ static int mba_setup(const struct resctrl_test *test, if (runs_per_allocation++ != 0) return 0; - if (allocation < ALLOCATION_MIN || allocation > ALLOCATION_MAX) + if (allocation > ALLOCATION_MAX) return END_OF_TESTS; sprintf(allocation_str, "%d", allocation); @@ -59,7 +60,7 @@ static int mba_setup(const struct resctrl_test *test, if (ret < 0) return ret; - allocation -= ALLOCATION_STEP; + allocation += ALLOCATION_STEP; return 0; } @@ -72,8 +73,9 @@ static int mba_measure(const struct user_params *uparams, static bool show_mba_info(unsigned long *bw_imc, unsigned long *bw_resc) { - int allocation, runs; + unsigned int allocation; bool ret = false; + int runs; ksft_print_msg("Results are displayed in (MB)\n"); /* Memory bandwidth from 100% down to 10% */ @@ -103,7 +105,7 @@ static bool show_mba_info(unsigned long *bw_imc, unsigned long *bw_resc) avg_diff_per > MAX_DIFF_PERCENT ? "Fail:" : "Pass:", MAX_DIFF_PERCENT, - ALLOCATION_MAX - ALLOCATION_STEP * allocation); + ALLOCATION_MIN + ALLOCATION_STEP * allocation); ksft_print_msg("avg_diff_per: %d%%\n", avg_diff_per); ksft_print_msg("avg_bw_imc: %lu\n", avg_bw_imc);