@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ char **environ __attribute__((weak));
const unsigned long *_auxv __attribute__((weak));
/* startup code */
-void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
+void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("Os", "omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
{
__asm__ volatile (
#ifdef _NOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ char **environ __attribute__((weak));
const unsigned long *_auxv __attribute__((weak));
/* startup code */
-void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
+void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("Os", "omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
{
__asm__ volatile (
#ifdef _NOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ const unsigned long *_auxv __attribute__((weak));
* 2) The deepest stack frame should be set to zero
*
*/
-void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
+void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("Os", "omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
{
__asm__ volatile (
#ifdef _NOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ const unsigned long *_auxv __attribute__((weak));
#endif
/* startup code */
-void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
+void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("Os", "omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
{
__asm__ volatile (
#ifdef _NOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ char **environ __attribute__((weak));
const unsigned long *_auxv __attribute__((weak));
/* startup code, note that it's called __start on MIPS */
-void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector __start(void)
+void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("Os", "omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector __start(void)
{
__asm__ volatile (
/*".set nomips16\n"*/
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ char **environ __attribute__((weak));
const unsigned long *_auxv __attribute__((weak));
/* startup code */
-void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
+void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("Os", "omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
{
__asm__ volatile (
".option push\n"
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ char **environ __attribute__((weak));
const unsigned long *_auxv __attribute__((weak));
/* startup code */
-void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
+void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("Os", "omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
{
__asm__ volatile (
"lg %r2,0(%r15)\n" /* argument count */
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ const unsigned long *_auxv __attribute__((weak));
* 2) The deepest stack frame should be zero (the %rbp).
*
*/
-void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
+void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("Os", "omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
{
__asm__ volatile (
#ifdef _NOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR
As gcc doc [1] shows: Most optimizations are completely disabled at -O0 or if an -O level is not set on the command line, even if individual optimization flags are specified. Test result [2] shows, gcc>=11.1.0 deviates from the above description, but before gcc 11.1.0, "-O0" still forcely uses frame pointer in the _start function even if the individual optimize("omit-frame-pointer") flag is specified. The frame pointer related operations will change the stack pointer (e.g. In x86_64, an extra "push %rbp" will be inserted at the beginning of _start) and make it differs from the one we expected, as a result, break the whole startup function. To fix up this issue, as suggested by Thomas, the individual "Os" and "omit-frame-pointer" optimize flags are used together on _start function to disable frame pointer completely even if the -O0 is set on the command line. [1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230714094723.140603-1-falcon@tinylab.org/ Suggested-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/34b21ba5-7b59-4b3b-9ed6-ef9a3a5e06f7@t-8ch.de/ Fixes: 7f8548589661 ("tools/nolibc: make compiler and assembler agree on the section around _start") Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org> --- tools/include/nolibc/arch-aarch64.h | 2 +- tools/include/nolibc/arch-arm.h | 2 +- tools/include/nolibc/arch-i386.h | 2 +- tools/include/nolibc/arch-loongarch.h | 2 +- tools/include/nolibc/arch-mips.h | 2 +- tools/include/nolibc/arch-riscv.h | 2 +- tools/include/nolibc/arch-s390.h | 2 +- tools/include/nolibc/arch-x86_64.h | 2 +- 8 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)