Message ID | f6773559686a553269d84870eb23142e2dc1dc8c.1720146231.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | skip ENOTSUPP BPF selftests | expand |
On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 7:38 PM Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org> wrote: > > From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> > > Just like handling ENOTSUPP in test_lsm_cgroup_functional(), this patch > adds a new helper test_progs_get_error() to check whether the input error > is ENOTSUPP (524) or ENOTSUP (95). If it is, invoke test__skip() to skip > the test instead of using test__fail(). > > Use this helper in ASSERT_OK() before invoking CHECK() macro. > > Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> > --- > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c | 6 +---- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > I haven't followed these patch sets, but no, let's not add magical special error codes handling into ASSERT_xxx() macros. > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c > index 6df25de8f080..6511f5f4a00f 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c > @@ -102,12 +102,8 @@ static void test_lsm_cgroup_functional(void) > ASSERT_EQ(query_prog_cnt(cgroup_fd, "bpf_lsm_sk_alloc_security"), 0, "prog count"); > ASSERT_EQ(query_prog_cnt(cgroup_fd, NULL), 0, "total prog count"); > err = bpf_prog_attach(alloc_prog_fd, cgroup_fd, BPF_LSM_CGROUP, 0); > - if (err == -ENOTSUPP) { > - test__skip(); > - goto close_cgroup; > - } > if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "attach alloc_prog_fd")) > - goto detach_cgroup; > + goto close_cgroup; > ASSERT_EQ(query_prog_cnt(cgroup_fd, "bpf_lsm_sk_alloc_security"), 1, "prog count"); > ASSERT_EQ(query_prog_cnt(cgroup_fd, NULL), 1, "total prog count"); > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h > index 930a4181dbd9..d1d77785b165 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h > @@ -176,6 +176,23 @@ void test__skip(void); > void test__fail(void); > int test__join_cgroup(const char *path); > > +static inline bool test_progs_check_errno(int error, int check) > +{ > + return error == -check || > + (error && errno == check); > +} > + > +static inline int test_progs_get_error(int error) > +{ > + if (test_progs_check_errno(error, ENOTSUP) || > + test_progs_check_errno(error, ENOTSUPP)) { > + test__skip(); > + return 0; > + } else { > + return error; > + } > +} > + > #define PRINT_FAIL(format...) \ > ({ \ > test__fail(); \ > @@ -338,8 +355,10 @@ int test__join_cgroup(const char *path); > static int duration = 0; \ > long long ___res = (res); \ > bool ___ok = ___res == 0; \ > - CHECK(!___ok, (name), "unexpected error: %lld (errno %d)\n", \ > - ___res, errno); \ > + if (test_progs_get_error(___res)) \ > + CHECK(!___ok, (name), \ > + "unexpected error: %lld (errno %d)\n", \ > + ___res, errno); \ > ___ok; \ > }) > > -- > 2.43.0 >
On Mon, 2024-07-08 at 11:54 -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 7:38 PM Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> > > > > Just like handling ENOTSUPP in test_lsm_cgroup_functional(), this patch > > adds a new helper test_progs_get_error() to check whether the input error > > is ENOTSUPP (524) or ENOTSUP (95). If it is, invoke test__skip() to skip > > the test instead of using test__fail(). > > > > Use this helper in ASSERT_OK() before invoking CHECK() macro. > > > > Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> > > --- > > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c | 6 +---- > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++-- > > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > I haven't followed these patch sets, but no, let's not add magical > special error codes handling into ASSERT_xxx() macros. I agree with Andrii here. You might use -d (denylist) option for test_progs to filter out test cases you know are not supported. [...]
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c index 6df25de8f080..6511f5f4a00f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c @@ -102,12 +102,8 @@ static void test_lsm_cgroup_functional(void) ASSERT_EQ(query_prog_cnt(cgroup_fd, "bpf_lsm_sk_alloc_security"), 0, "prog count"); ASSERT_EQ(query_prog_cnt(cgroup_fd, NULL), 0, "total prog count"); err = bpf_prog_attach(alloc_prog_fd, cgroup_fd, BPF_LSM_CGROUP, 0); - if (err == -ENOTSUPP) { - test__skip(); - goto close_cgroup; - } if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "attach alloc_prog_fd")) - goto detach_cgroup; + goto close_cgroup; ASSERT_EQ(query_prog_cnt(cgroup_fd, "bpf_lsm_sk_alloc_security"), 1, "prog count"); ASSERT_EQ(query_prog_cnt(cgroup_fd, NULL), 1, "total prog count"); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h index 930a4181dbd9..d1d77785b165 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h @@ -176,6 +176,23 @@ void test__skip(void); void test__fail(void); int test__join_cgroup(const char *path); +static inline bool test_progs_check_errno(int error, int check) +{ + return error == -check || + (error && errno == check); +} + +static inline int test_progs_get_error(int error) +{ + if (test_progs_check_errno(error, ENOTSUP) || + test_progs_check_errno(error, ENOTSUPP)) { + test__skip(); + return 0; + } else { + return error; + } +} + #define PRINT_FAIL(format...) \ ({ \ test__fail(); \ @@ -338,8 +355,10 @@ int test__join_cgroup(const char *path); static int duration = 0; \ long long ___res = (res); \ bool ___ok = ___res == 0; \ - CHECK(!___ok, (name), "unexpected error: %lld (errno %d)\n", \ - ___res, errno); \ + if (test_progs_get_error(___res)) \ + CHECK(!___ok, (name), \ + "unexpected error: %lld (errno %d)\n", \ + ___res, errno); \ ___ok; \ })