@@ -991,6 +991,19 @@ static void gspca_set_default_mode(struct gspca_dev *gspca_dev)
v4l2_ctrl_handler_setup(gspca_dev->vdev.ctrl_handler);
}
+static int wxh_to_mode(struct gspca_dev *gspca_dev,
+ int width, int height)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < gspca_dev->cam.nmodes; i++) {
+ if (width == gspca_dev->cam.cam_mode[i].width
+ && height == gspca_dev->cam.cam_mode[i].height)
+ return i;
+ }
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
static int wxh_to_nearest_mode(struct gspca_dev *gspca_dev,
int width, int height)
{
@@ -1233,9 +1246,13 @@ static int vidioc_enum_frameintervals(struct file *filp, void *priv,
struct v4l2_frmivalenum *fival)
{
struct gspca_dev *gspca_dev = video_drvdata(filp);
- int mode = wxh_to_nearest_mode(gspca_dev, fival->width, fival->height);
+ int mode;
__u32 i;
+ mode = wxh_to_mode(gspca_dev, fival->width, fival->height);
+ if (mode < 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (gspca_dev->cam.mode_framerates == NULL ||
gspca_dev->cam.mode_framerates[mode].nrates == 0)
return -EINVAL;
According to v4l2-compliance VIDIOC_ENUM_FRAMEINTERVALS should fail for unsupported frame sizes, but gspca is too tolerant and tries to find the frame intervals for the frame size nearest to the requested one. This makes v4l2-compliance fail with this message: fail: v4l2-test-formats.cpp(123): \ found frame intervals for invalid size 321x240 test VIDIOC_ENUM_FMT/FRAMESIZES/FRAMEINTERVALS: FAIL Fix this by using an exact match for the frame size when enumerating frame intervals, and retuning an error if the frame size for which the frame intervals have been asked is not supported. Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ao2@ao2.it> --- drivers/media/usb/gspca/gspca.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)