| Message ID | 20190516011417.10590-2-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | rcar-vin: Merge Gen2 and Gen3 file operations | expand |
Hi Niklas, On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:46 AM Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> wrote: > The driver does not implement runtime resume and suspend function so > there is little point in trying to call them. This is a leftover from > the drivers soc_camera beginnings. > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> > Reviewed-by: Ulrich Hecht <uli+renesas@fpond.eu> > --- > drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c | 5 ----- > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c > index 7cbdcbf9b090c638..b821ea01786eb1ff 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c > @@ -798,9 +798,6 @@ static int rvin_initialize_device(struct file *file) > return ret; > > pm_runtime_enable(&vin->vdev.dev); > - ret = pm_runtime_resume(&vin->vdev.dev); Please pardon my ignorance, but which device is vin->vdev.dev? Who calls pm_runtime_get_sync() on it, and where? I see this function calls rvin_power_on(vin->v4l2_dev.dev) (before the call to pm_runtime_enable()), but presumably that's a different device? Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 09:23:41AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:46 AM Niklas Söderlund wrote: > > The driver does not implement runtime resume and suspend function so > > there is little point in trying to call them. This is a leftover from > > the drivers soc_camera beginnings. > > > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> > > Reviewed-by: Ulrich Hecht <uli+renesas@fpond.eu> > > --- > > drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c | 5 ----- > > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c > > index 7cbdcbf9b090c638..b821ea01786eb1ff 100644 > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c > > @@ -798,9 +798,6 @@ static int rvin_initialize_device(struct file *file) > > return ret; > > > > pm_runtime_enable(&vin->vdev.dev); > > - ret = pm_runtime_resume(&vin->vdev.dev); > > Please pardon my ignorance, but which device is vin->vdev.dev? This is the V4L2 video node class device, we shouldn't call any runtime PM function with this. I assume the current code works because the class device is a child of the physical device. > Who calls pm_runtime_get_sync() on it, and where? > > I see this function calls rvin_power_on(vin->v4l2_dev.dev) (before the > call to pm_runtime_enable()), but presumably that's a different device? That one is the physical platform device.
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c index 7cbdcbf9b090c638..b821ea01786eb1ff 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c @@ -798,9 +798,6 @@ static int rvin_initialize_device(struct file *file) return ret; pm_runtime_enable(&vin->vdev.dev); - ret = pm_runtime_resume(&vin->vdev.dev); - if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOSYS) - goto eresume; /* * Try to configure with default parameters. Notice: this is the @@ -817,7 +814,6 @@ static int rvin_initialize_device(struct file *file) return 0; esfmt: pm_runtime_disable(&vin->vdev.dev); -eresume: rvin_power_off(vin); return ret; @@ -868,7 +864,6 @@ static int rvin_release(struct file *file) * Then de-initialize hw module. */ if (fh_singular) { - pm_runtime_suspend(&vin->vdev.dev); pm_runtime_disable(&vin->vdev.dev); rvin_power_off(vin); }