@@ -34,8 +34,8 @@
#define CAL_MODULE_NAME "cal"
-#define MAX_WIDTH 1920
-#define MAX_HEIGHT 1200
+#define MAX_WIDTH_BYTES (8192 * 8)
+#define MAX_HEIGHT_LINES 16383
#define CAL_VERSION "0.1.0"
@@ -1330,15 +1330,21 @@ static int cal_calc_format_size(struct cal_ctx *ctx,
const struct cal_fmt *fmt,
struct v4l2_format *f)
{
- u32 bpl;
+ u32 bpl, max_width;
if (!fmt) {
ctx_dbg(3, ctx, "No cal_fmt provided!\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- v4l_bound_align_image(&f->fmt.pix.width, 48, MAX_WIDTH, 2,
- &f->fmt.pix.height, 32, MAX_HEIGHT, 0, 0);
+ /*
+ * Maximum width is bound by the DMA max width in bytes.
+ * We need to recalculate the actual maxi width depending on the
+ * number of bytes per pixels required.
+ */
+ max_width = MAX_WIDTH_BYTES / (ALIGN(fmt->bpp, 8) >> 3);
+ v4l_bound_align_image(&f->fmt.pix.width, 48, max_width, 2,
+ &f->fmt.pix.height, 32, MAX_HEIGHT_LINES, 0, 0);
bpl = (f->fmt.pix.width * ALIGN(fmt->bpp, 8)) >> 3;
f->fmt.pix.bytesperline = ALIGN(bpl, 16);
Currently we were using an arbitrarily small maximum resolution mostly based on available sensor capabilities. However the hardware DMA limits are much higher than the statically define maximum resolution we were using. There we rework the boundary check code to handle the maximum width and height based on the maximum line width in bytes and re-calculating the pixel width based on the given pixel format. Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> --- drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)