diff mbox series

[v2] media: em28xx: add missing em28xx_close_extension

Message ID 20210721194307.12155-1-paskripkin@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v2] media: em28xx: add missing em28xx_close_extension | expand

Commit Message

Pavel Skripkin July 21, 2021, 7:43 p.m. UTC
If em28xx dev has ->dev_next pointer, we need to delete dev_next list node
from em28xx_extension_devlist on disconnect to avoid UAF bugs and
corrupted list bugs, since driver frees this pointer on disconnect.

Fixes: 1a23f81b7dc3 ("V4L/DVB (9979): em28xx: move usb probe code to a proper place")
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+a6969ef522a36d3344c9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
---

Changes in v2:
	Previous patch was completely broken. I've done some debugging
	again and found true root case of the reported bug.

---
 drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Hans Verkuil July 29, 2021, 9:45 a.m. UTC | #1
On 21/07/2021 21:43, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> If em28xx dev has ->dev_next pointer, we need to delete dev_next list node
> from em28xx_extension_devlist on disconnect to avoid UAF bugs and
> corrupted list bugs, since driver frees this pointer on disconnect.
> 
> Fixes: 1a23f81b7dc3 ("V4L/DVB (9979): em28xx: move usb probe code to a proper place")
> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+a6969ef522a36d3344c9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 	Previous patch was completely broken. I've done some debugging
> 	again and found true root case of the reported bug.
> 
> ---
>  drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c b/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c
> index c1e0dccb7408..d56b040e1bd7 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c
> @@ -4139,8 +4139,10 @@ static void em28xx_usb_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf)
>  
>  	em28xx_close_extension(dev);
>  
> -	if (dev->dev_next)
> +	if (dev->dev_next) {
>  		em28xx_release_resources(dev->dev_next);
> +		em28xx_close_extension(dev->dev_next);

Wouldn't it be better to swap these two?

That order is also used for em28xx_close_extension(dev) and em28xx_release_resources(dev).

You do need to store dev->dev_next in a temp variable, though.

Regards,

	Hans

> +	}
>  	em28xx_release_resources(dev);
>  
>  	if (dev->dev_next) {
>
Pavel Skripkin July 29, 2021, 12:45 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:45:19 +0200
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> wrote:

> On 21/07/2021 21:43, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> > If em28xx dev has ->dev_next pointer, we need to delete dev_next
> > list node from em28xx_extension_devlist on disconnect to avoid UAF
> > bugs and corrupted list bugs, since driver frees this pointer on
> > disconnect.
> > 
> > Fixes: 1a23f81b7dc3 ("V4L/DVB (9979): em28xx: move usb probe code
> > to a proper place") Reported-and-tested-by:
> > syzbot+a6969ef522a36d3344c9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com> ---
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > 	Previous patch was completely broken. I've done some
> > debugging again and found true root case of the reported bug.
> > 
> > ---
> >  drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c
> > b/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c index
> > c1e0dccb7408..d56b040e1bd7 100644 ---
> > a/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c +++
> > b/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c @@ -4139,8 +4139,10 @@
> > static void em28xx_usb_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf) 
> >  	em28xx_close_extension(dev);
> >  
> > -	if (dev->dev_next)
> > +	if (dev->dev_next) {
> >  		em28xx_release_resources(dev->dev_next);
> > +		em28xx_close_extension(dev->dev_next);
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to swap these two?
> 
> That order is also used for em28xx_close_extension(dev) and
> em28xx_release_resources(dev).
> 
> You do need to store dev->dev_next in a temp variable, though.
> 

Hi, Hans!

I don't understand why I need to store dev->dev_next in a temp
variable. I don't see code in em28xx_release_resources() or
em28xx_close_extension() that zeroes this pointer.



With regards,
Pavel Skripkin
Hans Verkuil July 29, 2021, 1:40 p.m. UTC | #3
On 29/07/2021 14:45, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:45:19 +0200
> Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> 
>> On 21/07/2021 21:43, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
>>> If em28xx dev has ->dev_next pointer, we need to delete dev_next
>>> list node from em28xx_extension_devlist on disconnect to avoid UAF
>>> bugs and corrupted list bugs, since driver frees this pointer on
>>> disconnect.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 1a23f81b7dc3 ("V4L/DVB (9979): em28xx: move usb probe code
>>> to a proper place") Reported-and-tested-by:
>>> syzbot+a6969ef522a36d3344c9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> 	Previous patch was completely broken. I've done some
>>> debugging again and found true root case of the reported bug.
>>>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c | 4 +++-
>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c
>>> b/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c index
>>> c1e0dccb7408..d56b040e1bd7 100644 ---
>>> a/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c +++
>>> b/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c @@ -4139,8 +4139,10 @@
>>> static void em28xx_usb_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf) 
>>>  	em28xx_close_extension(dev);
>>>  
>>> -	if (dev->dev_next)
>>> +	if (dev->dev_next) {
>>>  		em28xx_release_resources(dev->dev_next);
>>> +		em28xx_close_extension(dev->dev_next);
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better to swap these two?
>>
>> That order is also used for em28xx_close_extension(dev) and
>> em28xx_release_resources(dev).
>>
>> You do need to store dev->dev_next in a temp variable, though.
>>
> 
> Hi, Hans!
> 
> I don't understand why I need to store dev->dev_next in a temp
> variable. I don't see code in em28xx_release_resources() or
> em28xx_close_extension() that zeroes this pointer.

Apologies for the confusion, just ignore that bit. I misunderstood
what dev_next was for.

So check if swapping these two lines passes syzbot, and then that's
the final version.

Regards,

	Hans

> 
> 
> 
> With regards,
> Pavel Skripkin
> 
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c b/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c
index c1e0dccb7408..d56b040e1bd7 100644
--- a/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c
+++ b/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c
@@ -4139,8 +4139,10 @@  static void em28xx_usb_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf)
 
 	em28xx_close_extension(dev);
 
-	if (dev->dev_next)
+	if (dev->dev_next) {
 		em28xx_release_resources(dev->dev_next);
+		em28xx_close_extension(dev->dev_next);
+	}
 	em28xx_release_resources(dev);
 
 	if (dev->dev_next) {