Message ID | 20230421124428.393261-5-tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v4,1/8] v4l2-ctl: Add routing and streams support | expand |
Hi Tomi, Thank you for the patch. On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 03:44:24PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Add a very simple test for > VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_ROUTING/VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_ROUTING. > > We can't (at least at the moment) really know here what kind of routings > the driver would accept, but we can test a VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_ROUTING call, > followed by a VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_ROUTING call with the routing we > received. > > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> > --- > utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp | 12 ++++++++++++ > utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.h | 1 + > utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp > index a147604c..7c3a688b 100644 > --- a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp > +++ b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp > @@ -1241,6 +1241,18 @@ void testNode(struct node &node, struct node &node_m2m_cap, struct node &expbuf_ > node.is_passthrough_subdev = has_source && has_sink; > > if (has_routes) { > + printf("Sub-Device routing ioctls:\n"); > + > + for (unsigned which = V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY; > + which <= V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE; which++) { > + > + printf("\ttest %s VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_ROUTING/VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_ROUTING: %s\n", > + which ? "Active" : "Try", > + ok(testSubDevRouting(&node, which))); Weird indentation. Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > + } > + > + printf("\n"); > + > for (unsigned which = V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY; > which <= V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE; which++) { > > diff --git a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.h b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.h > index 0cd43980..35b2274b 100644 > --- a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.h > +++ b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.h > @@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ int testSubDevEnum(struct node *node, unsigned which, unsigned pad, unsigned str > int testSubDevFormat(struct node *node, unsigned which, unsigned pad, unsigned stream); > int testSubDevSelection(struct node *node, unsigned which, unsigned pad, unsigned stream); > int testSubDevFrameInterval(struct node *node, unsigned pad, unsigned stream); > +int testSubDevRouting(struct node *node, unsigned which); > > // Buffer ioctl tests > int testReqBufs(struct node *node); > diff --git a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp > index 07192bda..962d9244 100644 > --- a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp > +++ b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp > @@ -551,3 +551,19 @@ int testSubDevSelection(struct node *node, unsigned which, unsigned pad, unsigne > > return have_sel ? 0 : ENOTTY; > } > + > +int testSubDevRouting(struct node *node, unsigned which) > +{ > + struct v4l2_subdev_routing routing = {}; > + struct v4l2_subdev_route routes[256] = {}; > + > + routing.which = which; > + routing.routes = (__u64)&routes; > + routing.num_routes = 256; > + > + fail_on_test(doioctl(node, VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_ROUTING, &routing)); > + > + fail_on_test(doioctl(node, VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_ROUTING, &routing)); > + > + return 0; > +}
diff --git a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp index a147604c..7c3a688b 100644 --- a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp +++ b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp @@ -1241,6 +1241,18 @@ void testNode(struct node &node, struct node &node_m2m_cap, struct node &expbuf_ node.is_passthrough_subdev = has_source && has_sink; if (has_routes) { + printf("Sub-Device routing ioctls:\n"); + + for (unsigned which = V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY; + which <= V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE; which++) { + + printf("\ttest %s VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_ROUTING/VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_ROUTING: %s\n", + which ? "Active" : "Try", + ok(testSubDevRouting(&node, which))); + } + + printf("\n"); + for (unsigned which = V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY; which <= V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE; which++) { diff --git a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.h b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.h index 0cd43980..35b2274b 100644 --- a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.h +++ b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.h @@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ int testSubDevEnum(struct node *node, unsigned which, unsigned pad, unsigned str int testSubDevFormat(struct node *node, unsigned which, unsigned pad, unsigned stream); int testSubDevSelection(struct node *node, unsigned which, unsigned pad, unsigned stream); int testSubDevFrameInterval(struct node *node, unsigned pad, unsigned stream); +int testSubDevRouting(struct node *node, unsigned which); // Buffer ioctl tests int testReqBufs(struct node *node); diff --git a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp index 07192bda..962d9244 100644 --- a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp +++ b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp @@ -551,3 +551,19 @@ int testSubDevSelection(struct node *node, unsigned which, unsigned pad, unsigne return have_sel ? 0 : ENOTTY; } + +int testSubDevRouting(struct node *node, unsigned which) +{ + struct v4l2_subdev_routing routing = {}; + struct v4l2_subdev_route routes[256] = {}; + + routing.which = which; + routing.routes = (__u64)&routes; + routing.num_routes = 256; + + fail_on_test(doioctl(node, VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_ROUTING, &routing)); + + fail_on_test(doioctl(node, VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_ROUTING, &routing)); + + return 0; +}
Add a very simple test for VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_ROUTING/VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_ROUTING. We can't (at least at the moment) really know here what kind of routings the driver would accept, but we can test a VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_ROUTING call, followed by a VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_ROUTING call with the routing we received. Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> --- utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp | 12 ++++++++++++ utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.h | 1 + utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+)