Message ID | 20240523113236.432585-2-adrian.larumbe@collabora.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | drm: Fix dma_resv deadlock at drm object pin time | expand |
On Thu, 23 May 2024 12:32:17 +0100 Adrián Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@collabora.com> wrote: > When Panfrost must pin an object that is being prepared a dma-buf > attachment for on behalf of another driver, the core drm gem object pinning > code already takes a lock on the object's dma reservation. > > However, Panfrost GEM object's pinning callback would eventually try taking > the lock on the same dma reservation when delegating pinning of the object > onto the shmem subsystem, which led to a deadlock. > > This can be shown by enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH, which throws > the following recursive locking situation: > > weston/3440 is trying to acquire lock: > ffff000000e235a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_gem_shmem_pin+0x34/0xb8 [drm_shmem_helper] > but task is already holding lock: > ffff000000e235a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_gem_pin+0x2c/0x80 [drm] > > Fix it by replacing drm_gem_shmem_pin with its locked version, as the lock > had already been taken by drm_gem_pin(). > > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> > Cc: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> > Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> > Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> > Fixes: a78027847226 ("drm/gem: Acquire reservation lock in drm_gem_{pin/unpin}()") > Signed-off-by: Adrián Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c > index d47b40b82b0b..8e0ff3efede7 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c > @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int panfrost_gem_pin(struct drm_gem_object *obj) > if (bo->is_heap) > return -EINVAL; > > - return drm_gem_shmem_pin(&bo->base); > + return drm_gem_shmem_pin_locked(&bo->base); > } > > static enum drm_gem_object_status panfrost_gem_status(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c index d47b40b82b0b..8e0ff3efede7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int panfrost_gem_pin(struct drm_gem_object *obj) if (bo->is_heap) return -EINVAL; - return drm_gem_shmem_pin(&bo->base); + return drm_gem_shmem_pin_locked(&bo->base); } static enum drm_gem_object_status panfrost_gem_status(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
When Panfrost must pin an object that is being prepared a dma-buf attachment for on behalf of another driver, the core drm gem object pinning code already takes a lock on the object's dma reservation. However, Panfrost GEM object's pinning callback would eventually try taking the lock on the same dma reservation when delegating pinning of the object onto the shmem subsystem, which led to a deadlock. This can be shown by enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH, which throws the following recursive locking situation: weston/3440 is trying to acquire lock: ffff000000e235a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_gem_shmem_pin+0x34/0xb8 [drm_shmem_helper] but task is already holding lock: ffff000000e235a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_gem_pin+0x2c/0x80 [drm] Fix it by replacing drm_gem_shmem_pin with its locked version, as the lock had already been taken by drm_gem_pin(). Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Cc: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Fixes: a78027847226 ("drm/gem: Acquire reservation lock in drm_gem_{pin/unpin}()") Signed-off-by: Adrián Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@collabora.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)