From patchwork Sun May 26 18:11:48 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Devarsh Thakkar X-Patchwork-Id: 13674335 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com (lelv0142.ext.ti.com [198.47.23.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99F1212B14F; Sun, 26 May 2024 18:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.23.249 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716747125; cv=none; b=fGcr60hYsxpYs/fM7Yb+rE0QnLwF9dGpvchwKYDkr/LoS+U8aDukqNb2gDBRHwtsa/EzByp9voYBcqhtRh2iLaPJdFO0XGqCgUxstNFjxx2RVscT1C9PG9uumFIFBeKMLIWmBl/6hKtrTZLOeAhNK/m3ga8ETPhCEG0c4kzKtrw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716747125; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OX9638MTevFX/ie6YKInE6t8JKdZ3ISf0pO1ivz4nXQ=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=a4PaDZV6rQ9mK2wjqtp+eu7fUYmCGYwKBmHyLepjxMBaILPbg6xtMFteOkoe78BCDlocHjotuPgeNJHLGXm1OJ+gYTiaJ0+sgF2uS02VGkc0aWe5sB70JZK2VKQKwUigXE0af+qD967zB7AFwVQGLn+Z2G1ln43XCA24lrz2eSo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b=lz5Fykl+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.23.249 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="lz5Fykl+" Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 44QIBnmt104929; Sun, 26 May 2024 13:11:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1716747109; bh=7b71w3wTu7ljSPqTnEpkFDRPeQGF6eQu8Nu53psHfAc=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=lz5Fykl+W5wLJD58DU4uzguynJDVuMsk7mtLDLxKJC4mgTYHQDeK1ihzeqdiahj4n ZFLPRPbPqRd1d6L0LkVBhMrfBCseOSJIU7rPNiZRRQNf2bFHUYsw0DhM6rLJRB+YN9 kYUKSo+DKwTEwbgsk3DBV0TRrEnu9sTcGGmDyWFA= Received: from DLEE110.ent.ti.com (dlee110.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.21]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 44QIBnm2045495 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 26 May 2024 13:11:49 -0500 Received: from DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) by DLEE110.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Sun, 26 May 2024 13:11:49 -0500 Received: from lelvsmtp5.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.250) by DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 26 May 2024 13:11:49 -0500 Received: from localhost (ti.dhcp.ti.com [172.24.227.95] (may be forged)) by lelvsmtp5.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 44QIBmSo101598; Sun, 26 May 2024 13:11:49 -0500 From: Devarsh Thakkar To: , , , , , , , , , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v9 10/10] gpu: ipu-v3: Use generic macro for rounding closest to specified value Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 23:41:48 +0530 Message-ID: <20240526181148.1131956-1-devarsht@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.1 In-Reply-To: <20240526175655.1093707-1-devarsht@ti.com> References: <20240526175655.1093707-1-devarsht@ti.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Use generic macro round_closest_up() for rounding closest to specified value instead of using local macro round_closest(). There is no change from functionality point of view as round_closest_up() is functionally same as the previously used local macro round_closest(). Signed-off-by: Devarsh Thakkar --- V9: No change V8: Update commit message V1->V7 : (No change, patch introduced in V7) --- drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-image-convert.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-image-convert.c b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-image-convert.c index 841316582ea9..5192a8b5c02c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-image-convert.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-image-convert.c @@ -477,8 +477,6 @@ static int calc_image_resize_coefficients(struct ipu_image_convert_ctx *ctx, return 0; } -#define round_closest(x, y) round_down((x) + (y)/2, (y)) - /* * Find the best aligned seam position for the given column / row index. * Rotation and image offsets are out of scope. @@ -565,7 +563,7 @@ static void find_best_seam(struct ipu_image_convert_ctx *ctx, * The closest input sample position that we could actually * start the input tile at, 19.13 fixed point. */ - in_pos_aligned = round_closest(in_pos, 8192U * in_align); + in_pos_aligned = round_closest_up(in_pos, 8192U * in_align); /* Convert 19.13 fixed point to integer */ in_pos_rounded = in_pos_aligned / 8192U;