Message ID | 20241225153056.GA3523@pendragon.ideasonboard.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL,FOR,v6.14] uvcvideo changes | expand |
From: builder@linuxtv.org
Pull request: https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20241225153056.GA3523@pendragon.ideasonboard.com/
Build log: https://builder.linuxtv.org/job/patchwork/410924/
Build time: 00:08:52
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20241225153056.GA3523@pendragon.ideasonboard.com
gpg: Signature made Wed 25 Dec 2024 12:59:40 PM UTC
gpg: using EDDSA key 7804022A38B7D13F41738C3685F1965061424BE1
gpg: issuer "laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com"
gpg: Good signature from "Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>" [full]
gpg: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com: Verified 8 signatures in the past
5 months. Encrypted 0 messages.
Summary: no issues. All 3 looked fine.
On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 02:41:08PM -0800, Patchwork Integration wrote: > Dear Laurent Pinchart: > > Thanks for your patches! > > The CI had a great time going through them, and it could not find > any issue. > > For more details, check the full report at: > https://linux-media.pages.freedesktop.org/-/users/patchwork/-/jobs/68621153/artifacts/report.htm . I don't know if it's worth it, but I wonder if we could save some CPU cycles and skip CI when the cover letter mentions a link to a successful CI pipeline run. Clearly not high on the wish list, just something to keep in mind. > Best regards, and Happy Hacking! > Media CI robot on behalf of the linux-media community. > > --- > Check the latest rules for contributing your patches at: > https://docs.kernel.org/driver-api/media/maintainer-entry-profile.html > > If you believe that the CI is wrong, kindly open an issue at > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/linux-media/media-ci/-/issues or reply-all > to this message. >