| Message ID | 510E65B3.10901@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi Sylwester, On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Prabhakar, > > On 02/03/2013 11:13 AM, Prabhakar Lad wrote: > [...] > >>>> +Required Properties : >>>> +- compatible: Must be "ti,tvp514x-decoder" >>> >>> >>> >>> There are no significant differences among TVP514* devices as listed >>> above, >>> you would like to handle above ? > > > Sorry for the mangled sentence, I intended to write "in the driver" instead > of the last "above". > > Not a problem I got what you intended :) >>> I'm just wondering if you don't need ,for instance, two separate >>> compatible >>> properties, e.g. "ti,tvp5146-decoder" and "ti,tvp5147-decoder" ? >>> >> There are few differences in init/power sequence tough, I would still >> like to have >> single compatible property "ti,tvp514x-decoder", If you feel we need >> separate >> property I will change it please let me know on this. > > > As Sekhar already mentioned, wildcards in the compatible property should > not be used. You could just use exact part names in the compatible > properties and list them all in the tvp514x_of_match[] array. Even though > this driver doesn't care about the differences between various tvp514? > chips, there might be others that do. > > [...] > Ok, I'll have separate compatible properties. >>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF) >>>> +static const struct of_device_id tvp514x_of_match[] = { >>>> + {.compatible = "ti,tvp514x-decoder", }, >>>> + {}, >>>> +}; >>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tvp514x_of_match); >>>> + >>>> +static struct tvp514x_platform_data >>>> + *tvp514x_get_pdata(struct i2c_client *client) >>>> +{ >>>> + if (!client->dev.platform_data&& client->dev.of_node) { >>>> >>>> + struct tvp514x_platform_data *pdata; >>>> + struct v4l2_of_endpoint bus_cfg; >>>> + struct device_node *endpoint; >>>> + >>>> + pdata = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, >>>> + sizeof(struct tvp514x_platform_data), >>>> + GFP_KERNEL); >>>> + client->dev.platform_data = pdata; >>> >>> >>> >>> Do you really need to set client->dev.platform_data this way ? >>> What about passing struct tvp514x_decoder pointer to this function >>> and initializing struct tvp514x_decoder::pdata instead ? >>> >>> >> Yes that can work too, I'll do the same. > > > Ok, thanks. > > >>>> + if (!pdata) >>>> + return NULL; >>>> + >>>> + endpoint = of_get_child_by_name(client->dev.of_node, >>>> "port"); >>>> + if (endpoint) >>>> + endpoint = of_get_child_by_name(endpoint, >>>> "endpoint"); >>> >>> >>> >>> I think you could replace these two calls above with >>> >>> endpoint = >>> v4l2_of_get_next_endpoint(client->dev.of_node); >>> >> Ok >> >>> Now I see I should have modified this function to ensure it works also >>> when >>> 'port' nodes are grouped in a 'ports' node. >>> >> So V5 series of V4l OF parser doesn't have this fix ? > > > No, it doesn't. I think we need something along the lines of: > > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c > b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c > index e1f570b..8a286f1 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c > @@ -185,10 +185,15 @@ struct device_node *v4l2_of_get_next_endpoint(const > struct device_node *parent, > * This is the first call, we have to find a port within > * this node. > */ > - for_each_child_of_node(parent, port) { > + while (port = of_get_next_child(parent, port)) { > if (!of_node_cmp(port->name, "port")) > break; > - } > + if (!of_node_cmp(port->name, "ports")) { > + parent = port; > + of_node_put(port); > + port = NULL: > + } > + }; > if (port) { > /* Found a port, get an endpoint. */ > endpoint = of_get_next_child(port, NULL); > > However this shouldn't affect you, as you don't use the 'ports' node... > I will likely post v6 including this fix tomorrow. > yes I don't need it, Just asked so that I can test my driver on latest version :) Regards, --Prabhakar > -- > > Regards, > Sylwester -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c index e1f570b..8a286f1 100644 --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c @@ -185,10 +185,15 @@ struct device_node *v4l2_of_get_next_endpoint(const struct device_node *parent, * This is the first call, we have to find a port within * this node. */ - for_each_child_of_node(parent, port) { + while (port = of_get_next_child(parent, port)) { if (!of_node_cmp(port->name, "port")) break; - } + if (!of_node_cmp(port->name, "ports")) { + parent = port; + of_node_put(port); + port = NULL: + } + }; if (port) { /* Found a port, get an endpoint. */