Message ID | e72bf5c1-833e-ad7a-f92f-05527eabea14@cisco.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 04:18:32PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > If the device is of type VFL_TYPE_SUBDEV then vdev->ioctl_ops > is NULL so the 'if (!ops->vidioc_query_ext_ctrl)' check would fail. > Add a test for !ops to the condition. > > All sub-devices that have controls will use the control framework, > so they do not have an equivalent to ops->vidioc_query_ext_ctrl. > Returning false if ops is NULL is the correct thing to do here. > > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com> Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c > index bdb5c226d01c..5198c9eeb348 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c > @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static inline bool ctrl_is_pointer(struct file *file, u32 id) > return ctrl && ctrl->is_ptr; > } > > - if (!ops->vidioc_query_ext_ctrl) > + if (!ops || !ops->vidioc_query_ext_ctrl) > return false; > > return !ops->vidioc_query_ext_ctrl(file, fh, &qec) && > -- > 2.14.1 >
Hi Hans, Thank you for the patch. On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 17:18:32 EET Hans Verkuil wrote: > If the device is of type VFL_TYPE_SUBDEV then vdev->ioctl_ops > is NULL so the 'if (!ops->vidioc_query_ext_ctrl)' check would fail. More than that, it would crash. > Add a test for !ops to the condition. > > All sub-devices that have controls will use the control framework, > so they do not have an equivalent to ops->vidioc_query_ext_ctrl. > Returning false if ops is NULL is the correct thing to do here. > > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com> This is missing a Fixes: tag, and a Reported-by: tag would be nice too. Apart from that, Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > --- > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c > b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c index > bdb5c226d01c..5198c9eeb348 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c > @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static inline bool ctrl_is_pointer(struct file *file, > u32 id) return ctrl && ctrl->is_ptr; > } > > - if (!ops->vidioc_query_ext_ctrl) > + if (!ops || !ops->vidioc_query_ext_ctrl) > return false; > > return !ops->vidioc_query_ext_ctrl(file, fh, &qec) &&
diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c index bdb5c226d01c..5198c9eeb348 100644 --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static inline bool ctrl_is_pointer(struct file *file, u32 id) return ctrl && ctrl->is_ptr; } - if (!ops->vidioc_query_ext_ctrl) + if (!ops || !ops->vidioc_query_ext_ctrl) return false; return !ops->vidioc_query_ext_ctrl(file, fh, &qec) &&
If the device is of type VFL_TYPE_SUBDEV then vdev->ioctl_ops is NULL so the 'if (!ops->vidioc_query_ext_ctrl)' check would fail. Add a test for !ops to the condition. All sub-devices that have controls will use the control framework, so they do not have an equivalent to ops->vidioc_query_ext_ctrl. Returning false if ops is NULL is the correct thing to do here. Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com> --- drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)